IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025i15p115-129.html

The Nexus between Governance Quality and Economic Growth of Malaysia: Short- And Long-Run Analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Saizal Pinjaman

    (Centre for Economic Development and Policy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia)

  • Mohamad Afifi Mat Thani

    (National Audit Department Malaysia, Malaysia)

  • Mohd. Allif Anwar Abu Bakar

    (Centre for Economic Development and Policy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia)

  • Syamsul Hadi

    (Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of governance quality on Malaysia’s economic growth from 2000 to 2021, focusing on six World Governance Indicators (WGI): voice and accountability, political stability, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, and control of corruption. Despite Malaysia’s significant economic progress, the relationship between governance quality and growth remains underexplored, particularly in terms of long-run and short-run dynamics. Using the cointegration and error correction models, the study examines the short-run and long-run relationships between governance indicators and real GDP. The findings reveal that political stability and government effectiveness have significant positive long-run impacts on real GDP, emphasizing their critical role in fostering economic growth. However, regulatory quality and rule of law, while positively correlated, are statistically insignificant in the long run, suggesting that their benefits may take longer to materialize. Control of corruption shows a counterintuitive negative long-run relationship, likely due to transitional costs of anti-corruption measures. In the short run, most governance indicators significantly influence real GDP, with the error correction term confirming a robust adjustment toward long-run equilibrium. The study recommends prioritizing political stability and government effectiveness while implementing sustained reforms to enhance regulatory quality, rule of law, and anti-corruption measures. Policymakers should adopt a holistic approach to governance reforms, ensuring transparency, accountability, and institutional efficiency to support Malaysia’s long-term economic growth and resilience. These insights are crucial for aligning governance strategies with Malaysia’s development goals under initiatives like the Shared Prosperity Vision 2030.

Suggested Citation

  • Saizal Pinjaman & Mohamad Afifi Mat Thani & Mohd. Allif Anwar Abu Bakar & Syamsul Hadi, 2025. "The Nexus between Governance Quality and Economic Growth of Malaysia: Short- And Long-Run Analyses," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(15), pages 115-129, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:15:p:115-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-15/115-129.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/the-nexus-between-governance-quality-and-economic-growth-of-malaysia-short-and-long-run-analyses/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Engle & Clive Granger, 2015. "Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 39(3), pages 106-135.
    2. Mark Kunawotor & Godson Ahiabor & Eric Yobo, 2024. "Government size, institutional quality and economic welfare in Africa," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 52(4), pages 578-590, July.
    3. Morrissey, Oliver & Udomkerdmongkol, Manop, 2012. "Governance, Private Investment and Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 437-445.
    4. Pinjaman, Saizal & Kogid, Mori, 2020. "Macroeconomic Determinants of House Prices in Malaysia," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 54(1), pages 153-165.
    5. Krueger, Anne O, 1974. "The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(3), pages 291-303, June.
    6. Noha EMARA & I-Ming CHIU, 2016. "The Impact of Governance Environment on Economic Growth: The Case of Middle Eastern and North African Countries," Journal of Economics Library, EconSciences Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 24-37, March.
    7. Silberberger, Magdalene & Königer, Jens, 2016. "Regulation, trade and economic growth," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 308-322.
    8. Aisen, Ari & Veiga, Francisco José, 2013. "How does political instability affect economic growth?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 151-167.
    9. Muhammad Azam, 2022. "Governance and Economic Growth: Evidence from 14 Latin America and Caribbean Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1470-1495, June.
    10. Mthuli Ncube & John C. Anyanwu & Kjell Hausken, 2014. "Inequality, Economic Growth and Poverty in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 26(3), pages 435-453, September.
    11. Stephen Knack & Philip Keefer, 1995. "Institutions And Economic Performance: Cross‐Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(3), pages 207-227, November.
    12. Dani Rodrik, 2006. "Institutions for High-Quality Growth: What They Are and How to Acquire Them," Chapters, in: Kartik Roy & Jörn Sideras (ed.), Institutions, Globalisation and Empowerment, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Rachid Mira & Ahmed Hammadache, 2017. "Relationship between good governance and economic growth - A contribution to the institutional debate about state failure in developing countries," CEPN Working Papers 2017-12, Centre d'Economie de l'Université de Paris Nord.
    14. repec:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:1:p:1185-1198 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin & Richard J. Smith, 2001. "Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 289-326.
    16. Knack, Stephen & Keefer, Philip, 1995. "Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Indicators," MPRA Paper 23118, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Paolo Mauro, 1995. "Corruption and Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(3), pages 681-712.
    18. Mthuli Ncube & John Anyanwu & Kjell Hausken, 2014. "Working Paper 195 - Inequality, Economic Growth, and Poverty in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)," Working Paper Series 999, African Development Bank.
    19. Rachid Mira & Ahmed Hammadache, 2017. "Relationship between good governance and economic growth: A contribution to the institutional debate about state failure in developing countries," CEPN Working Papers hal-01593290, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Magaletti, Nicola & Nortarnicola, Valeria & Di Molfetta, Mauro & Mariani, Stefano & Leogrande, Angelo, 2025. "Logistics Performance and ESG Outcomes: An Empirical Exploration Using IV Panel Models and Machine Learning," SocArXiv huxcs_v1, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolaas Groenewold & Sam Hak Kan Tang, 2007. "Killing The Goose That Lays The Golden Egg: Institutional Change And Economic Growth In Hong Kong," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 45(4), pages 787-799, October.
    2. Nawaz, Saima, 2015. "Growth effects of institutions: A disaggregated analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 118-126.
    3. Sambit Bhattacharyya, 2011. "Growth Miracles and Growth Debacles," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13609.
    4. Piątek, Dawid & Sarzec, Katarzyna, . "Państwo a dobrobyt ekonomiczny - między wolnością a przymusem," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2009(5-6).
    5. Deepraj Mukherjee, 2018. "Corruption in International Business: Does Economic Globalization Help?," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(3), pages 623-634, June.
    6. Krisztina Kis-Katos & Günther G. Schulze, 2013. "Corruption in Southeast Asia: a survey of recent research," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 27(1), pages 79-109, May.
    7. Shrabani Saha & Kunal Sen, 2019. "The corruption-growth relationship: Do political institutions matter?," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-65, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Marion Payen & Patrick Rondé, 2020. "Culture, Institutions and Economic Growth," Working Papers of BETA 2020-18, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    9. Jacky AMPROU & Elsa DURET, 1999. "Réformes, groupes d'intérêt et dépendance à l'aide : théorie et estimation économétrique," Working Papers 199907, CERDI.
    10. Kouadio, Hugues Kouassi & Gakpa, Lewis-Landry, 2022. "Do economic growth and institutional quality reduce poverty and inequality in West Africa?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 41-63.
    11. Dawid Piątek & Katarzyna Sarzec, 2009. "Państwo a dobrobyt ekonomiczny - między wolnością a przymusem," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 5-6, pages 1-19.
    12. Ceyhun Haydaroglu, 2015. "The Relationship between Property Rights and Economic Growth: an Analysis of OECD and EU Countries," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 4, pages 217-239, December.
    13. Bo Sui & Chun-Ping Chang & Yin Chu, 2021. "Political Stability: an Impetus for Spatial Environmental Spillovers," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(2), pages 387-415, June.
    14. Siddiqui, Danish Ahmed & Ahmed, Qazi Masood, 2013. "The effect of institutions on economic growth: A global analysis based on GMM dynamic panel estimation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 18-33.
    15. Torbjörn Becker & Anders Olofsgård, 2018. "From abnormal to normal : Two tales of growth from 25 years of transition," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 26(4), pages 769-800, October.
    16. Fisayo Fagbemi & Geraldine E. Nzeribe & Tolulope T. Osinubi & Simplice A. Asongu, 2021. "Interconnections between Governance and Socioeconomic Conditions: Understanding Sub-Saharan African Challenges," Journal of Africa SEER Centre(ASC) 21/005, Africa SEER Centre(ASC).
    17. Constantinos Alexiou & Persefoni Tsaliki & Hashim Rasha Osman, 2014. "Institutional Quality And Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence From The Sudanese Economy," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 59(203), pages 119-138, October –.
    18. Karim Khan, 2015. "Endogenous Institutional Change and Privileged Groups," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 54(3), pages 171-195.
    19. El-Hadj Bah & Lei Fang, 2015. "Working Paper - 219 - Impact of the business Environment on Output and Productivity in Africa," Working Paper Series 2159, African Development Bank.
    20. Saima Nawaz & M. Idrees Khawaja, 2016. "Fiscal Policy, Institutions And Growth: New Insights," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 64(05), pages 1251-1278, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:15:p:115-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.