IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v5y2021i10p242-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Official and Public Attitudes towards Solar Energy in Botswana: The Case of Domestic Solar Water Heaters in Gaborone

Author

Listed:
  • Magdeline Cleopatra Nondo

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, University Of South Africa)

Abstract

This study set out to compare household attitudes towards the use of domestic solar energy with those of government officials, with specific reference to Solar Water Heaters (SWHs) in the City of Gaborone in Botswana. The specific objectives were; i) To establish household perceptions and attitudes towards SWHs ii) To find out official attitudes towards SWHs and iii) To analyze determinants of household attitudes towards SWHs. Data to address these objectives was generated using the mixed methods research design whereby both qualitative and quantitative data were gathered simultaneously to determine attitudes of both officials and the public towards domestic solar energy. A sample of 400 households consisting of low and high-income residential areas was selected using the Taro Yamane’s formula, Old Naledi represented low income and Village represented high income. Approximately 264 households were interviewed in Old Naledi, and 136 in the Village. This was complemented by key informant interviews involving officials from the Department of Energy Affairs, Department of Environmental Affairs and distributors of SWHs involving solar power and solar hart. The key instrument for quantitative data collection was a semi-structured questionnaire, whereas interview guides were used to generate qualitative data. The key findings of the study are that that the public is aware of solar energy and its uses, and have a positive attitude towards its adoption in the form of SWHs on condition that they are reliable, cost effective and user friendly. Officials too had a positive attitude towards domestic solar energy but did not invest as much effort in promoting its adoption as they did in promoting conventional energy. The Government has taken good initiatives to promote solar energy, but they do not succeed due to apparent lack of commitment. The results of the study also show that SWHs are not adequately marketed by their distributors and this has contributed to the current adoption rate among the public. In conclusion, the results of this study support the need for awareness building and capacity building from both the government officials and distributors of SWHs for the adoption of domestic solar energy to meet the escalating demands for energy in a manner that does not harm the environment. Based on these results, the study has made recommendations for policy, the public and future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdeline Cleopatra Nondo, 2021. "Comparing Official and Public Attitudes towards Solar Energy in Botswana: The Case of Domestic Solar Water Heaters in Gaborone," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(10), pages 242-271, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:10:p:242-271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-5-issue-10/242-271.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/papers/comparing-official-and-public-attitudes-towards-solar-energy-in-botswana-the-case-of-domestic-solar-water-heaters-in-gaborone/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karlstrøm, Henrik & Ryghaug, Marianne, 2014. "Public attitudes towards renewable energy technologies in Norway. The role of party preferences," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 656-663.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeynep Clulow & Michele Ferguson & Peta Ashworth & David Reiner, 2021. "Political ideology and public views of the energy transition in Australia and the UK," Working Papers EPRG2106, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    2. Baharoon, Dhyia Aidroos & Rahman, Hasimah Abdul & Fadhl, Saeed Obaid, 2016. "Publics׳ knowledge, attitudes and behavioral toward the use of solar energy in Yemen power sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 498-515.
    3. Ho, Lip-Wah & Lie, Tek-Tjing & Leong, Paul TM & Clear, Tony, 2018. "Developing offshore wind farm siting criteria by using an international Delphi method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 53-67.
    4. Kosorić, Vesna & Huang, Huajing & Tablada, Abel & Lau, Siu-Kit & Tan, Hugh T.W., 2019. "Survey on the social acceptance of the productive façade concept integrating photovoltaic and farming systems in high-rise public housing blocks in Singapore," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 197-214.
    5. Gabriela O. Chiciudean & Rezhen Harun & Felix H. Arion & Daniel I. Chiciudean & Camelia F. Oroian & Iulia C. Muresan, 2018. "A Critical Approach on Sustainable Renewable Energy Sources in Rural Area: Evidence from North-West Region of Romania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Arndt, Christoph, 2023. "Climate change vs energy security? The conditional support for energy sources among Western Europeans," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Zhang, Wei & Yang, Jun & Sheng, Pengfei & Li, Xuesong & Wang, Xingwu, 2014. "Potential cooperation in renewable energy between China and the United States of America," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 403-409.
    8. Jacob B. Rode & Peter H. Ditto, 2020. "Comparing the effects of a news article’s message and source on fracking attitudes in an experimental study," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(3), pages 255-269, September.
    9. Pratiwi, Santi & Juerges, Nataly, 2022. "Digital advocacy at the science-policy interface: Resolving land-use conflicts in conservation forests," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    10. Aune, Margrethe & Godbolt, Åsne Lund & Sørensen, Knut H. & Ryghaug, Marianne & Karlstrøm, Henrik & Næss, Robert, 2016. "Concerned consumption. Global warming changing household domestication of energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 290-297.
    11. Nordø, Åsta Dyrnes & Andersen, Gisle & Merk, Christine, 2023. "Technology will save the climate! Attitudes towards Norway's climate policy in four social groups," Kiel Working Papers 2239, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    12. Md Ershadul Karim & Abu Bakar Munir & Mohammad Ataul Karim & Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki & Siti Hawa Abu-Bakar & Nazmi Sellami & Nurul Aini Bani & Mohamad Zaki Hassan, 2018. "Energy Revolution for Our Common Future: An Evaluation of the Emerging International Renewable Energy Law," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, July.
    13. Christian Krekel & Johannes Rode & Alexander Roth, 2023. "Do wind turbines have adverse health impacts," CEP Discussion Papers dp1950, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    14. Yu, H. & Reiner, D. & Chen, H. & Mi, Z., 2018. "A comparison of public preferences for different low-carbon energy technologies: Support for CCS, nuclear and wind energy in the United Kingdom," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1826, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    15. Pradipta Halder & Sari Havu-Nuutinen & Janne Pietarinen & Anas Zyadin & Paavo Pelkonen, 2014. "Subject Knowledge and Perceptions of Bioenergy among School Teachers in India: Results from a Survey," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Sunčana Slijepčević & Željka Kordej-De Villa, 2021. "Public Attitudes toward Renewable Energy in Croatia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Spielhofer, R. & Thrash, T. & Hayek, U. Wissen & Grêt-Regamey, A. & Salak, B. & Grübel, J. & Schinazi, V.R., 2021. "Physiological and behavioral reactions to renewable energy systems in various landscape types," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    18. Shi, Y.Y. & Wei, Z.X. & Shahbaz, M., 2023. "Analyzing the co-evolutionary dynamics of consumers’ attitudes and green energy technologies based on a triple-helix model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    19. Xue, Yan & Lindkvist, Carmel Margaret & Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka, 2021. "Barriers and potential solutions to the diffusion of solar photovoltaics from the public-private-people partnership perspective – Case study of Norway," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    20. Ozcan, Mustafa, 2019. "Factors influencing the electricity generation preferences of Turkish citizens: Citizens' attitudes and policy recommendations in the context of climate change and environmental impact," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 381-393.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:10:p:242-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.