Author
Listed:
- Enylina Nordin
(Faculty of Accountancy, University Technology MARA, Melaka campus)
- Wan Shafizah Hussain
(Faculty of Accountancy, University Technology MARA, Melaka campus)
- Mohd Tarmizi Ibrahim
(Faculty of Accountancy, University Technology MARA, Melaka campus)
- Mohd Hisham Johari
(Faculty of Art & Design, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Puncak Alam campus)
- Muhamad Reduan Abdul Malik
(Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri (LHDN))
Abstract
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors have become increasingly influential in investment decision-making and corporate strategy. However, empirical evidence regarding the relationship between ESG performance and stock returns remains mixed and sometimes contradictory. This study synthesizes findings from 234 empirical studies examining ESG–financial performance relationships, focusing on measurement approaches and contextual moderating factors. The findings indicate that ESG integration is generally associated with neutral to moderately positive financial outcomes, primarily through enhanced risk management, reputational advantages, and crisis resilience. However, substantial inconsistencies arise due to methodological differences among ESG rating agencies and contextual factors such as regional institutional environments, sectoral characteristics, and market conditions. Developed markets typically exhibit stronger ESG–financial performance relationships compared with emerging markets, while sector-specific ESG materiality determines which ESG pillars influence financial outcomes. Overall, the evidence suggests that ESG effects on stock performance are highly context-dependent rather than universally positive. The study highlights the importance of standardized ESG measurement frameworks and context-sensitive investment strategies for improving the reliability and practical relevance of ESG research.
Suggested Citation
Enylina Nordin & Wan Shafizah Hussain & Mohd Tarmizi Ibrahim & Mohd Hisham Johari & Muhamad Reduan Abdul Malik, 2026.
"ESG and Stock Performance: A Systematic Review of Heterogeneous Effects, Measurement Challenges, and Investment Implications,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(3), pages 4530-4542, March.
Handle:
RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:3:p:4530-4542
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:3:p:4530-4542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.