IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbz/fcpbbr/v11y2014i1p87-114.html

The Use of Social Network Sites in the Workplace: a Case Study in Brazilian Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Marcos Hideyuki Yokoyama

    (Osaka University)

  • Tomoki Sekiguchi

    (Osaka University)

Abstract

People are increasingly using Social Network Sites (SNS) through corporate platforms or open websites such as Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook. As a recent phenomenon, the potential benefits and risks of such tools are still not properly addressed in organizations. The purpose of this paper is to analyze how Brazilian companies are using this tool to achieve their corporate strategic objectives. We conducted a qualitative case study and proposed a framework that classified the companies into three groups according to their position about SNS use in the workplace. The knowledge creation group benefits the social and intellectual capital generated by online discussion, while the corporate branding group seeks to strengthen the corporate image with customers. The administrative control group is more concerned about productivity, procrastination and data confidentiality. We also highlight the reasons for employees to use SNS during working time, the benefits and risks caused by formation of social capital and concerns about privacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcos Hideyuki Yokoyama & Tomoki Sekiguchi, 2014. "The Use of Social Network Sites in the Workplace: a Case Study in Brazilian Companies," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 11(2), pages 87-114, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:11:y:2014:i:1:p:87-114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/download/347/525
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Godoy, Arilda Schmidt, 1995. "Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa e suas possibilidades," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 35(2), March.
    2. Mayer, Adalbert & Puller, Steven L., 2008. "The old boy (and girl) network: Social network formation on university campuses," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-2), pages 329-347, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gil S. Epstein & Odelia Heizler-Cohen, 2016. "The Formation of Immigrant Networks in the Short and the Long Run," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Rediet Abebe & Nicole Immorlica & Jon Kleinberg & Brendan Lucier & Ali Shirali, 2022. "On the Effect of Triadic Closure on Network Segregation," Papers 2205.13658, arXiv.org.
    3. Heather Mathews & Alexander Volfovsky, 2023. "Community informed experimental design," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(4), pages 1141-1166, October.
    4. repec:mod:depeco:0002 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Murat, Marina, 2014. "Out of Sight, Not Out of Mind. Education Networks and International Trade," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 53-66.
    6. Yann Bramoullé & Bernard Fortin, 2009. "The Econometrics of Social Networks," Cahiers de recherche 0913, CIRPEE.
    7. Lockwood, Ben & Porcelli, Francesco & Redoano, Michela & Schiavone, Antonio, 2022. "Yardstick Competition in the Digital Age : Unveiling New Networks in Tax Competition," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1438, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    8. William C. Horrace & Hyunseok Jung & Jonathan L. Presler & Amy Ellen Schwartz, 2025. "What makes a classmate a peer? Examining which peers matter in NYC elementary schools," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 38(3), pages 1-28, September.
    9. Marina Murat, 2017. "International Students and Investments Abroad," Global Economy Journal (GEJ), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(1), pages 1-33, March.
    10. Jason M. Fletcher & Stephen L. Ross, 2018. "Estimating the effects of friends on health behaviors of adolescents," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(10), pages 1450-1483, October.
    11. Donald R. Davis & Jonathan I. Dingel & Joan Monras & Eduardo Morales, 2019. "How Segregated Is Urban Consumption?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(4), pages 1684-1738.
    12. Valerie Michelman & Joseph Price & Seth D Zimmerman, 2022. "Old Boys’ Clubs and Upward Mobility Among the Educational Elite [Do Immigrants Assimilate More Slowly Today Than in the Past?]," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 137(2), pages 845-909.
    13. Antonio Cabrales & Antoni Calvó-Armengol & Yves Zenou, 2009. "Social Interactions and Spillovers: Incentives,Segregation and Topology," Working Papers 2009-06, FEDEA.
    14. Yannis M. Ioannides & Giorgio Topa, 2010. "Neighborhood Effects: Accomplishments And Looking Beyond Them," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 343-362, February.
    15. Antoine Mandel & Xavier Venel, 2022. "Sequential competition and the strategic origins of preferential attachment," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 51(3), pages 483-508, November.
    16. Patacchini, Eleonora & Bisin, Alberto, 2019. "Dynamic Social Interactions and Health Risk Behavior," CEPR Discussion Papers 13918, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Maximilian Goethner & Michael Wyrwich, 2020. "Cross-faculty proximity and academic entrepreneurship: the role of business schools," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1016-1062, August.
    18. Braz Camargo & Todd Stinebrickner & Ralph Stinebrickner, 2007. "Evidence about the Potential Role for Affirmative Action in Higher Education," NBER Working Papers 13342, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Estefânia Hetman de Almeida Caciato & Cândido Ferreira da Silva Filho & Samuel Carvalho De Benedicto & Vinícius Eduardo Ferrari & Duarcides Ferreira Mariosa & Diego de Melo Conti & Bruna Angela Branch, 2025. "Comparative Study of ESG Practices Among Brazilian Sanitation Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Marco Battaglini & Valerio Leone Sciabolazza & Eleonora Patacchini, 2020. "Effectiveness of Connected Legislators," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 739-756, October.
    21. Alexia Gaudeul & Caterina Giannetti, 2015. "Privacy, Trust and Social Network Formation," Jena Economics Research Papers 2015-023, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:11:y:2014:i:1:p:87-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Lasso The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Sarah Lasso to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fucapbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.