IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7312-d1723401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of ESG Practices Among Brazilian Sanitation Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Estefânia Hetman de Almeida Caciato

    (Sociedade de Abastecimento de Água e Saneamento S/A (SANASA), Avenida da Saudade 500, Ponte Preta, Campinas 13041-903, Brazil)

  • Cândido Ferreira da Silva Filho

    (Postgraduate Program in Sustainability, School of Economics and Business, Campus I, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Euryclides de Jesus Zerbini Street 1516, Campinas 13087-571, Brazil)

  • Samuel Carvalho De Benedicto

    (Postgraduate Program in Sustainability, School of Economics and Business, Campus I, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Euryclides de Jesus Zerbini Street 1516, Campinas 13087-571, Brazil)

  • Vinícius Eduardo Ferrari

    (Postgraduate Program in Sustainability, School of Economics and Business, Campus I, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Euryclides de Jesus Zerbini Street 1516, Campinas 13087-571, Brazil)

  • Duarcides Ferreira Mariosa

    (Postgraduate Program in Sustainability, School of Economics and Business, Campus I, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Euryclides de Jesus Zerbini Street 1516, Campinas 13087-571, Brazil)

  • Diego de Melo Conti

    (Postgraduate Program in Sustainability, School of Economics and Business, Campus I, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Euryclides de Jesus Zerbini Street 1516, Campinas 13087-571, Brazil)

  • Bruna Angela Branchi

    (Postgraduate Program in Sustainability, School of Economics and Business, Campus I, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Euryclides de Jesus Zerbini Street 1516, Campinas 13087-571, Brazil)

  • Rubén Danilo Bourdon García

    (Ingeniería en Seguridad y Salud para el Trabajo, Fundación Universitaria San Mateo, Transversal 17 No. 25-25, Bogotá 111311, Colombia)

Abstract

Brazilian sanitation companies disclose their sustainable practices through sustainability reports as part of their commitment to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6 of the 2030 Agenda, which aims to ensure universal access to water and sanitation. This study proposes a methodology to evaluate how these companies integrate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles into their management and disclosure practices, rather than assessing service delivery or operational outputs directly. These indicators were applied to the sustainability reports of Brazil’s three largest sanitation companies: Sabesp (Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo), Copasa (Companhia de Saneamento de Minas Gerais), and Sanepar (Companhia de Saneamento do Paraná). The results indicate that all three companies have incorporated sustainability into their competitive strategies and corporate governance practices. Sabesp demonstrated a stronger adherence in the environmental and governance dimensions, Copasa excelled in social performance while also performing well in governance, and Sanepar exhibited the lowest adherence among the three. Hence, we present a methodological framework for monitoring corporate ESG performance and governance practices aligned with SDG 6, focusing on their management and disclosure practices, rather than directly assessing service delivery or operational results.

Suggested Citation

  • Estefânia Hetman de Almeida Caciato & Cândido Ferreira da Silva Filho & Samuel Carvalho De Benedicto & Vinícius Eduardo Ferrari & Duarcides Ferreira Mariosa & Diego de Melo Conti & Bruna Angela Branch, 2025. "Comparative Study of ESG Practices Among Brazilian Sanitation Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7312-:d:1723401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7312/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7312/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7312-:d:1723401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.