IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aye/journl/v9y2023i1p36-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Factors Affecting Corporate Governance Maturity Level: A Research on the Companies Traded on Borsa İstanbul

Author

Listed:
  • Ekrem ARIKAN

    (Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul Ticaret University, Istanbul, Türkiye)

  • Feyzullah YETGİN

    (Department of Business Administration, Istanbul Ticaret University, Istanbul, Türkiye)

Abstract

Corporate governance, one of the management theories, is one of the important topics for companies. Compliance with corporate governance principles is a sensitive issue, especially in companies whose shares are traded on stock exchange markets, which have thousands/millions of investors and stakeholders, and/or operate internationally. Today, the economic activities of companies and their social interaction with their ecosystem have become dynamic on a national and global scale. The basic principles of corporate governance “transparency”, “responsibility”, “accountability”, “fairness” and the related obligations have great importance for companies. In Turkey, listed companies are obliged to comply with a significant part of the corporate governance principles with the regulations of the Capital Markets Board. As for the items that they are not obliged to comply with, as of 2018, there are reporting obligations with the “comply or explain” view on the Public Disclosure Platform operated by the Cen-tral Registry Agency. In this study, trading duration after initial public offering and corporate governance compliance reports of publicly traded companies have been taken into account, and Corporate Governance Maturity Level and Corporate Governance Maturity Index were studied with the developed methodology based on the subsections of “Shareholders”, “Trans-parency”, “Stakeholders” and “Board of Directors”. In the study, the effect of the duration after initial public offering on the Corporate Governance Maturity Level was examined in general and by subsections using Tukey HSD analysis. It is envisaged that being first study on this subject, it will have a leading impact on further next academic studies. As a result of the study, i) Except for 2021, when the number of newly traded companies is high, the Corporate Gover-nance Maturity Index values of the listed companies tend to increase. ii) The maturity level of industrial companies is above the stock market average. iii) While the maturity level of listed companies is higher in terms of principles regarding public disclosure, it is the lowest in terms of principles related to the board of directors. iv) There is an improvement in the Corporate Governance Maturity Level, depending on the length of time the companies are traded on the stock exchange, and the level of compliance with the principles regarding public disclosure and transparency and shareholders is relatively higher.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekrem ARIKAN & Feyzullah YETGİN, 2023. "Analysis of Factors Affecting Corporate Governance Maturity Level: A Research on the Companies Traded on Borsa İstanbul," Yildiz Social Science Review, Yildiz Technical University, vol. 9(1), pages 36-54.
  • Handle: RePEc:aye:journl:v:9:y:2023:i:1:p:36-54
    DOI: 10.51803/yssr.1170149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://yssr.yildiz.edu.tr/storage/upload/pdfs/1701157030-en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.51803/yssr.1170149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nuriye Yetgin & Ersan Ersoy, 2021. "Firmaların BIST Kurumsal Yönetim Endeksine Alınmasının Hisse Senedi Getirisine Etkisi," Journal of Research in Economics, Politics & Finance, Ersan ERSOY, vol. 6(1), pages 181-200.
    2. Paul Gompers & Joy Ishii & Andrew Metrick, 2003. "Corporate Governance and Equity Prices," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(1), pages 107-156.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gilberto E. Arce & Edgar Robles C., 2005. "Corporate Governance in Costa Rica," Research Department Publications 3218, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    2. Klapper, Leora F. & Love, Inessa, 2004. "Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 703-728, November.
    3. Manuel Ammann & Philipp Horsch & David Oesch, 2016. "Competing with Superstars," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(10), pages 2842-2858, October.
    4. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.
    5. Alfonso Mendoza-Velázquez & Luis Carlos Ortuño-Barba & Luis David Conde-Cortés, 2022. "Corporate governance and firm performance in hybrid model countries," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(1), pages 32-58, February.
    6. Gerry Gallery & Emerson Cooper & John Sweeting, 2008. "Corporate Disclosure Quality: Lessons from Australian Companies on the Impact of Adopting International Financial Reporting Standards," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(3), pages 257-273, September.
    7. Tiantian Gu & Anand Venkateswaran, 2018. "Firm-supplier relations and managerial compensation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 621-649, October.
    8. Adi Masli & Matthew G. Sherwood & Rajendra P. Srivastava, 2018. "Attributes and Structure of an Effective Board of Directors: A Theoretical Investigation," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(4), pages 485-523, December.
    9. Carlos Jiménez-Angueira & Nathan Stuart, 2015. "Relative performance evaluation, pay-for-luck, and double-dipping in CEO compensation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 701-732, May.
    10. Enikolopov, Ruben & Petrova, Maria & Stepanov, Sergey, 2014. "Firm value in crisis: Effects of firm-level transparency and country-level institutions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 72-84.
    11. Kim, Sang-Joon & Bae, John & Oh, Hannah, 2019. "Financing strategically: The moderation effect of marketing activities on the bifurcated relationship between debt level and firm valuation of small and medium enterprises," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 663-681.
    12. Alan Gregory & Julie Whittaker, 2013. "Exploring the Valuation of Corporate Social Responsibility—A Comparison of Research Methods," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Rubén Chavarín, 2020. "Risk governance, banks affiliated to business groups, and foreign ownership," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 1-37, March.
    14. Hinh Khieu & Nam H. Nguyen & Hieu V. Phan & Jon A. Fulkerson, 2023. "Political Corruption and Corporate Risk-Taking," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 93-113, April.
    15. Amrita S. Nain & Anand M. Vijh, 2021. "Do managers provide misleading earnings forecasts before stock repurchases?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 50(4), pages 1013-1046, December.
    16. Smith, Deborah Drummond & Gleason, Kimberly C. & Kannan, Yezen H., 2021. "Auditor liability and excess cash holdings: Evidence from audit fees of foreign incorporated firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    17. Michela Scatigna & Dora Xia & Anna Zabai & Omar Zulaica, 2021. "Achievements and challenges in ESG markets," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, December.
    18. Hongjin Zhu & Yue Pan & Jiaping Qiu & Jinli Xiao, 2022. "Hometown Ties and Favoritism in Chinese Corporations: Evidence from CEO Dismissals and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 283-310, March.
    19. Custódio, Cláudia & Ferreira, Miguel A. & Laureano, Luís, 2013. "Why are US firms using more short-term debt?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 182-212.
    20. Pinkowitz, Lee & Stulz, Rene M. & Williamson, Rohan, 2012. "Multinationals and the High Cash Holdings Puzzle," Working Paper Series 2012-10, Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Journal: Yildiz Social Science Review;

    JEL classification:

    • F00 - International Economics - - General - - - General
    • F30 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - General
    • G00 - Financial Economics - - General - - - General
    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)
    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General
    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General
    • M20 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - General
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aye:journl:v:9:y:2023:i:1:p:36-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Murat DONDURAN (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibytutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.