IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aye/journl/v9y2023i1p36-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Factors Affecting Corporate Governance Maturity Level: A Research on the Companies Traded on Borsa İstanbul

Author

Listed:
  • Ekrem ARIKAN

    (Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul Ticaret University, Istanbul, Türkiye)

  • Feyzullah YETGİN

    (Department of Business Administration, Istanbul Ticaret University, Istanbul, Türkiye)

Abstract

Corporate governance, one of the management theories, is one of the important topics for companies. Compliance with corporate governance principles is a sensitive issue, especially in companies whose shares are traded on stock exchange markets, which have thousands/millions of investors and stakeholders, and/or operate internationally. Today, the economic activities of companies and their social interaction with their ecosystem have become dynamic on a national and global scale. The basic principles of corporate governance “transparency”, “responsibility”, “accountability”, “fairness” and the related obligations have great importance for companies. In Turkey, listed companies are obliged to comply with a significant part of the corporate governance principles with the regulations of the Capital Markets Board. As for the items that they are not obliged to comply with, as of 2018, there are reporting obligations with the “comply or explain” view on the Public Disclosure Platform operated by the Cen-tral Registry Agency. In this study, trading duration after initial public offering and corporate governance compliance reports of publicly traded companies have been taken into account, and Corporate Governance Maturity Level and Corporate Governance Maturity Index were studied with the developed methodology based on the subsections of “Shareholders”, “Trans-parency”, “Stakeholders” and “Board of Directors”. In the study, the effect of the duration after initial public offering on the Corporate Governance Maturity Level was examined in general and by subsections using Tukey HSD analysis. It is envisaged that being first study on this subject, it will have a leading impact on further next academic studies. As a result of the study, i) Except for 2021, when the number of newly traded companies is high, the Corporate Gover-nance Maturity Index values of the listed companies tend to increase. ii) The maturity level of industrial companies is above the stock market average. iii) While the maturity level of listed companies is higher in terms of principles regarding public disclosure, it is the lowest in terms of principles related to the board of directors. iv) There is an improvement in the Corporate Governance Maturity Level, depending on the length of time the companies are traded on the stock exchange, and the level of compliance with the principles regarding public disclosure and transparency and shareholders is relatively higher.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekrem ARIKAN & Feyzullah YETGİN, 2023. "Analysis of Factors Affecting Corporate Governance Maturity Level: A Research on the Companies Traded on Borsa İstanbul," Yildiz Social Science Review, Yildiz Technical University, vol. 9(1), pages 36-54.
  • Handle: RePEc:aye:journl:v:9:y:2023:i:1:p:36-54
    DOI: 10.51803/yssr.1170149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://yssr.yildiz.edu.tr/storage/upload/pdfs/1701157030-en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.51803/yssr.1170149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Gompers & Joy Ishii & Andrew Metrick, 2003. "Corporate Governance and Equity Prices," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(1), pages 107-156.
    2. Nuriye Yetgin & Ersan Ersoy, 2021. "Firmaların BIST Kurumsal Yönetim Endeksine Alınmasının Hisse Senedi Getirisine Etkisi," Journal of Research in Economics, Politics & Finance, Ersan ERSOY, vol. 6(1), pages 181-200.
    3. Abdallah, Abed Al-Nasser & Ismail, Ahmad K., 2017. "Corporate governance practices, ownership structure, and corporate performance in the GCC countries," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 98-115.
    4. Saleh H. Hussain & Chris Mallin, 2002. "Corporate Governance in Bahrain," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(3), pages 197-210, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marwan Mansour & Hamzeh Al Amosh & Ahmad Yuosef Alodat & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Mohammed W. A. Saleh, 2022. "The Relationship between Corporate Governance Quality and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Capital Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Thi-Minh-Ngoc Luu & Phuong Mai Nguyen & Huy Hung Ta, 2024. "Revisiting the Corporate Governance–Firm Performance Nexus in Vietnam: Does Capital Structure Really Matter?," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 17(2), pages 182-201, December.
    3. Jim-Yuh Huang & Kao-Yi Shen & Joseph C.P. Shieh & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2019. "Strengthen Financial Holding Companies’ Business Sustainability by Using a Hybrid Corporate Governance Evaluation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-27, January.
    4. Akbar, Muhammad & Hussain, Shahzad & Ahmad, Tanveer & Hassan, Shoib, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Pakistan: Dynamic Panel Estimation," CAFE Working Papers 6, Centre for Accountancy, Finance and Economics (CAFE), Birmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University.
    5. Anita Mirchandani & Namrata Gupta, 2018. "Impact of Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance on the Performance: A Case of Selected Banks in UAE," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(3), pages 197-206.
    6. Marghoob Enam & Syed Noorul Shajar & Niladri Das, 2023. "Non-Monotonic Relationship between Corporate Governance and Banks’ Operating Performance—The Moderating Role of CEO Duality: Evidence from Selected Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Naseem Ahamed & Nitya Nand Tripathi, 2023. "Financial Performance as a Determinant of The Cost of Capital: An Empirical Study on Listed Companies in India," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 31(2), pages 69-87.
    8. Jason Zhang & Hong Zhu & Hung-bin Ding, 2013. "Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Investigation in the Post Sarbanes-Oxley Era," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 381-392, May.
    9. Gilberto E. Arce & Edgar Robles C., 2005. "Corporate Governance in Costa Rica," Research Department Publications 3218, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    10. Pinheiro, Marcelo, 2009. "Short-selling restrictions, takeovers and the wealth of long-run shareholders," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(5-6), pages 361-375, May.
    11. Klapper, Leora F. & Love, Inessa, 2004. "Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 703-728, November.
    12. Manuel Ammann & Philipp Horsch & David Oesch, 2016. "Competing with Superstars," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(10), pages 2842-2858, October.
    13. Tan, Monica & Liu, Bin, 2016. "CEO's managerial power, board committee memberships and idiosyncratic volatility," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 21-30.
    14. Gokkaya, Sinan & Liu, Xi & Stulz, René M., 2023. "Do firms with specialized M&A staff make better acquisitions?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 75-105.
    15. Boubakri, Narjess & Ghouma, Hatem, 2010. "Control/ownership structure, creditor rights protection, and the cost of debt financing: International evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2481-2499, October.
    16. Hearn, Bruce, 2021. "Institutional determinants of bid–ask spreads in Caribbean offshore stock exchanges," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    17. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.
    18. Alfonso Mendoza-Velázquez & Luis Carlos Ortuño-Barba & Luis David Conde-Cortés, 2022. "Corporate governance and firm performance in hybrid model countries," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(1), pages 32-58, February.
    19. García-Feijóo, Luis & Hossain, Md Miran & Javakhadze, David, 2021. "Managerial social capital and dividend smoothing," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Ion Frecautan & Irina Ivashkovskaya, 2024. "Is corporate governance important for green bond performance in emerging capital markets?," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 14(1), pages 175-212, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F00 - International Economics - - General - - - General
    • F30 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - General
    • G00 - Financial Economics - - General - - - General
    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)
    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General
    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General
    • M20 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - General
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aye:journl:v:9:y:2023:i:1:p:36-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Murat DONDURAN (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibytutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.