IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v10y2020i3p442-454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Realization of private and public interest in taxation during public financial activity in Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Mariia Karmalita

    (Associate Professor at University of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine, Ukraine)

  • Anna Nechai

    (Head of the law department of the International Science and Technology University named by Academic Yurij Bugai, Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Tetiana Sholkova

    (Department of Financial Law, Educational and Scientific Institute of Law, University of State Fiscal Service of Ukraine, Irpin, Ukraine, lawyer)

  • Kostiantyn Hubskyi

    (Department of Financial Law, Educational and Scientific Institute of Law, University of State Fiscal Service of Ukraine, Irpin, Ukraine)

Abstract

This article analyzes the legal basis for the realization of private and public interest in taxation, ways to establish a balance between private and public interests as a basis for a “tax security†of the state. It is stated that: 1) the peculiarity of Ukrainian legislation is the insufficient balance of private and public interests in taxation; 2) the balance of private and public interests in taxation should be implemented at the level of law; 3) the state has not yet established a climate of trust between the state and taxpayers due to imperfect tax legislation, frequent changes in tax rules, low level of professional training of tax officials, low level of service for taxpayers by the tax authorities and lack of transparency in using the public monetary funds by government bodies. The current correlation and the ratio of private and public interest in in the legal literature and in tax legislation is analyzed, recommendations for its improvement are offered. The foreign approaches to the balancing of the private and public interest in the tax legislation has been reviewed. The concept of "tax security of the state" is formulated, the basic requirements to its maintenance are defined, namely: 1) existence of clear transparent procedures of realization of norms of tax laws; 2) existence of a highly professional tax service; 3) existence of established appropriate level of tax culture of the population which allows to increase revenues through voluntary payment of taxes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariia Karmalita & Anna Nechai & Tetiana Sholkova & Kostiantyn Hubskyi, 2020. "Realization of private and public interest in taxation during public financial activity in Ukraine," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 10(3), pages 442-454, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:442-454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An10v3/6.%20Karmalita,%20Nechai,%20Sholkova.,%20Hubsky.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alm, James & McClelland, Gary H. & Schulze, William D., 1992. "Why do people pay taxes?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 21-38, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Torgler, Benno & Schneider, Friedrich & Schaltegger, Christoph A., 2007. "With or Against the People? The Impact of a Bottom-Up Approach on Tax Morale and the Shadow Economy," Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics, Working Paper Series qt6331x6vz, Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics.
    2. Agumas Alamirew Mebratu, 2024. "Theoretical foundations of voluntary tax compliance: evidence from a developing country," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Colin C. Williams, 2023. "A Modern Guide to the Informal Economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18668.
    4. Chen, An & Hieber, Peter & Sureth, Caren, 2022. "Pay for tax certainty? Advance tax rulings for risky investment under multi-dimensional tax uncertainty," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 273, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    5. Fábio Pereira Silva & Reinaldo Guerreiro & Eduardo Flores, 2019. "Voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: the slippery slope framework in the Brazilian context," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 66(2), pages 147-180, June.
    6. Friedrich Heinemann & Martin Kocher, 2013. "Tax compliance under tax regime changes," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(2), pages 225-246, April.
    7. Mattos, Enlinson & Rocha, Fabiana & Toporcov, Patricia, 2013. "Programas de incentivos fiscais são eficazes? Evidência a partir da avaliação do impacto do programa nota fiscal paulista sobre a arrecadação de ICMS," Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil), vol. 67(1), April.
    8. Goerke, Laszlo, 2013. "Relative consumption and tax evasion," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 52-65.
    9. Gustavo Henrique de Andrade & Miriam Bruhn & David McKenzie, 2016. "A Helping Hand or the Long Arm of the Law? Experimental Evidence on What Governments Can Do to Formalize Firms," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 30(1), pages 24-54.
    10. Combey, Adama, 2020. "Evaluation De L’Ecart De Tva Au Togo [Evaluation Of The Vat Gap In Togo]," MPRA Paper 101478, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Jahnke, Bjoern, 2015. "Tax morale and reciprocity. A case study from Vietnam," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-563, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    12. Bruno S. Frey & Stephan Meier, "undated". "Pro-Social Behavior, Reciprocity or Both?," IEW - Working Papers 107, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    13. Matthias Kasper & James Alm, 2022. "Does the Bomb-crater Effect Really Exist? Evidence from the Laboratory," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 78(1-2), pages 87-111.
    14. Mehmet Nar, 2015. "The Effects of Behavioral Economics on Tax Amnesty," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 5(2), pages 580-589.
    15. Klaus Abbink & Jordi Brandts, 2016. "Political autonomy and independence: Theory and experimental evidence," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 28(3), pages 461-496, July.
    16. Christoph Bühren & Thorben C. Kundt, 2013. "Worker or Shirker – Who Evades More Taxes? A Real Effort Experiment," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201326, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    17. repec:fgv:epgrbe:v:67:n:1:a:5 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Chuanlu Ge & Yuhan Bi & Jia Xu, 2024. "Local donation culture and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from China," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 734-763, July.
    19. Ronconi, Lucas & Zarazaga S.J., Rodrigo, 2015. "Labor Exclusion and the Erosion of Citizenship Responsibilities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 453-461.
    20. Adriana AnaMaria Davidescu & Eduard Mihai Manta & Adina Teodora Stoica-Ungureanu & Magdalena Anton (Musat), 2022. "Could Religiosity and Religion Influence the Tax Morale of Individuals? An Empirical Analysis Based on Variable Selection Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-32, November.
    21. Claudia Keser & David Masclet & Claude Montmarquette, 2020. "Labor Supply, Taxation, and the Use of Tax Revenues: A Real-Effort Experiment in Canada, France, and Germany," Public Finance Review, , vol. 48(6), pages 714-750, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public financial activity; private and public interest in taxation; tax policy; tax security; public finance; public monetary funds; public needs of population.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law
    • K34 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Tax Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:442-454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.