IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apd/rper00/y2024i67id555.html

Qual a Percepção dos Brasileiros em Relação às Áreas Verdes Urbanas?

Author

Listed:
  • Maycon Jorge Ulisses Saraiva

    (UFGD)

  • André Geraldo Berezuk

    (UFGD)

  • Adelsom Soares Filho
  • Luciana Virginia Mario Bernardo

    (Mario Bernardo)

Abstract

Áreas verdes urbanas são essenciais para a qualidade de vida das pessoas que residem nas cidades. Estas áreas prestam serviços ecossistêmicos que possibilitam por exemplo, a redução de temperatura, melhoram a qualidade do ar e facilitam a absorção das águas das chuvas, entre outros. A partir deste contexto, o objetivo deste estudo é identificar a percepção que os brasileiros têm sobre as áreas verdes e a prestação de serviços ecossistêmicos. Para tal, utilizou-se a literatura para a elaboração de um questionário online, aplicado a 511 indivíduos, residentes em Mato Grosso do Sul. A coleta de dados seguiu a estrutura bola de neve. A partir dos dados coletados, foi realizada análise fatorial, além da utilização de estatística descritiva e testes não paramétricos para o tratamento das informações coletadas. Os resultados apontaram em relação as áreas verdes, três fatores: i- Benefícios da existência de parques na área urbana; ii- Influência das áreas verdes na saúde humana; e iii- Problemas causados pelas áreas verdes urbanas. A percepção dos respondentes é neutra quanto ao primeiro fator, porém, quanto ao segundo fator, os respondentes concordam com a importância da existência de áreas verdes urbanas, bem como, com os benefícios que trazem à saúde humana.

Suggested Citation

  • Maycon Jorge Ulisses Saraiva & André Geraldo Berezuk & Adelsom Soares Filho & Luciana Virginia Mario Bernardo, 2024. "Qual a Percepção dos Brasileiros em Relação às Áreas Verdes Urbanas?," RPER, Associação Portuguesa para o Desenvolvimento Regional, issue 67, pages 63-76, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:apd:rper00:y:2024:i:67:id:555
    DOI: 10.59072/rper.vi67.555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.review-rper.com/index.php/rper/article/view/555
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.review-rper.com/index.php/rper/article/download/555/499
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.59072/rper.vi67.555?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaczynski, A.T. & Potwarka, L.R. & Saelens P, B.E., 2008. "Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(8), pages 1451-1456.
    2. Micheels, Eric T. & Nolan, James F., 2016. "Examining the effects of absorptive capacity and social capital on the adoption of agricultural innovations: A Canadian Prairie case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 127-138.
    3. Bolund, Per & Hunhammar, Sven, 1999. "Ecosystem services in urban areas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 293-301, May.
    4. Chiabai, Aline & Quiroga, Sonia & Martinez-Juarez, Pablo & Suárez, Cristina & García de Jalón, Silvestre & Taylor, Tim, 2020. "Exposure to green areas: Modelling health benefits in a context of study heterogeneity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Sean L. Maxwell & Richard A. Fuller & Thomas M. Brooks & James E. M. Watson, 2016. "Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers," Nature, Nature, vol. 536(7615), pages 143-145, August.
    6. repec:plo:pone00:0224059 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Haiming Yan & Jinyan Zhan & Feng Wu & Huicai Yang, 2016. "Effects of Climate Change and LUCC on Terrestrial Biomass in the Lower Heihe River Basin during 2001–2010," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Zhan, Jinyan & Chu, Xi & Li, Zhihui & Jia, Siqi & Wang, Guofeng, 2019. "Incorporating ecosystem services into agricultural management based on land use/cover change in Northeastern China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 401-411.
    9. Kubitza, Christoph & Krishna, Vijesh V. & Urban, Kira & Alamsyah, Zulkifli & Qaim, Matin, 2018. "Land Property Rights, Agricultural Intensification, and Deforestation in Indonesia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 312-321.
    10. Langemeyer, Johannes & Baró, Francesc & Roebeling, Peter & Gómez-Baggethun, Erik, 2015. "Contrasting values of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas: The case of park Montjuïc in Barcelona," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 178-186.
    11. Nowlis, Stephen M & Kahn, Barbara E & Dhar, Ravi, 2002. "Coping with Ambivalence: The Effect of Removing a Neutral Option on Consumer Attitude and Preference Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(3), pages 319-334, December.
    12. Loft, Lasse & Le, Dung Ngoc & Pham, Thuy Thu & Yang, Anastasia Lucy & Tjajadi, Januarti Sinarra & Wong, Grace Yee, 2017. "Whose Equity Matters? National to Local Equity Perceptions in Vietnam's Payments for Forest Ecosystem Services Scheme," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 164-175.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Yang & Zhifang Wang & Guangsi Lin, 2021. "Performance Assessment Indicators for Comparing Recreational Services of Urban Parks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Chompoonut Kongphunphin & Manat Srivanit, 2021. "A Multi-Dimensional Clustering Applied to Classify the Typology of Urban Public Parks in Bangkok Metropolitan Area, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Zhang, Hao & Wang, Yanwen & Qi, Rui & He, Chao & Yang, Mingmei & Cai, Yuanyuan & Chai, Guohui, 2026. "Natural resource accounting for urban ecosystem: A case study in Central China based on the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    4. Xiao, Lan & Haiping, Tang & Haoguang, Liang, 2017. "A theoretical framework for researching cultural ecosystem service flows in urban agglomerations," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 95-104.
    5. Jin Han Park & Dong Kun Lee & Chan Park & Ho Gul Kim & Tae Yong Jung & Songyi Kim, 2017. "Park Accessibility Impacts Housing Prices in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Goran Krsnik & Sonia Reyes-Paecke & Keith M. Reynolds & Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo & José Ramón González Olabarria, 2023. "Assessing Relativeness in the Provision of Urban Ecosystem Services: Better Comparison Methods for Improved Well-Being," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Andersson, Krister P. & Smith, Steven M. & Alston, Lee J. & Duchelle, Amy E. & Mwangi, Esther & Larson, Anne M. & de Sassi, Claudio & Sills, Erin O. & Sunderlin, William D. & Wong, Grace Y., 2018. "Wealth and the distribution of benefits from tropical forests: Implications for REDD+," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 510-522.
    8. Kubitza, Christoph & Dib, Jonida Bou & Kopp, Thomas & Krishna, Vijesh V. & Nuryartono, Nunung & Qaim, Matin & Romero, Miriam & Klasen, Stephan, 2019. "Labor savings in agriculture and inequality at different spatial scales: The expansion of oil palm in Indonesia," EFForTS Discussion Paper Series 26, University of Goettingen, Collaborative Research Centre 990 "EFForTS, Ecological and Socioeconomic Functions of Tropical Lowland Rainforest Transformation Systems (Sumatra, Indonesia)".
    9. Bou Dib, Jonida & Alamsyah, Zulkifli & Qaim, Matin, 2018. "Land-use change and income inequality in rural Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 55-66.
    10. Kristian Steensen Nielsen & Theresa M. Marteau & Jan M. Bauer & Richard B. Bradbury & Steven Broad & Gayle Burgess & Mark Burgman & Hilary Byerly & Susan Clayton & Dulce Espelosin & Paul J. Ferraro & , 2021. "Biodiversity conservation as a promising frontier for behavioural science," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(5), pages 550-556, May.
    11. Gaodi Xie & Wenhui Chen & Shuyan Cao & Chunxia Lu & Yu Xiao & Changshun Zhang & Na Li & Shuo Wang, 2014. "The Outward Extension of an Ecological Footprint in City Expansion: The Case of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-16, December.
    12. P. Hlaváčková & D. Šafařík, 2016. "Quantification of the utility value of the recreational function of forests from the aspect of valuation practice," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(8), pages 345-356.
    13. Alexander V. Rusanov, 2019. "Dacha dwellers and gardeners: garden plots and second homes in Europe and Russia," Population and Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 3(1), pages 107-124, April.
    14. Yutong Zhang & Wei Zhou & Danxue Luo, 2023. "The Relationship Research between Biodiversity Conservation and Economic Growth: From Multi-Level Attempts to Key Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Jaza Folefack, Achille Jean & Ngo Njiki, Marie Gaelle & Darr, Dietrich, 2019. "Safeguarding forests from smallholder oil palm expansion by more intensive production? The case of Ngwei forest (Cameroon)," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 45-61.
    16. Hui, Ling Chui & Jim, C.Y., 2022. "Urban-greenery demands are affected by perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices, and socio-demographic and environmental-cultural factors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    17. Emblemsvåg, Jan, 2022. "Wind energy is not sustainable when balanced by fossil energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    18. Monika Kopecká & Daniel Szatmári & Konštantín Rosina, 2017. "Analysis of Urban Green Spaces Based on Sentinel-2A: Case Studies from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Veerkamp, Clara J. & Schipper, Aafke M. & Hedlund, Katarina & Lazarova, Tanya & Nordin, Amanda & Hanson, Helena I., 2021. "A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    20. Amanda Balasooriya & Darshana Sedera, 2025. "Top Management Challenges in Using Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development Goals: An Exploratory Case Study of an Australian Agribusiness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apd:rper00:y:2024:i:67:id:555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elisabete Martins (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.review-rper.com/index.php/rper .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.