IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ani/irdjoe/v4y2022i2p275-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drivers of Family Planning Services Utilization in Pakistan: A Literature Survey and Recent Trends in Contraceptive Use

Author

Listed:
  • Komal Urooj

    (MPhil Scholar, Department of Economics, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan)

  • Tusawar Iftikhar Ahmad

    (Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Azhar Bhatti

    (Associate Lecturer, Department of Economics, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan)

  • Altaf Hussain

    (Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan)

Abstract

Population planning is inevitable for a sustainable and secure future of a lower middle-income economy, like, Pakistan which stands fifth populous economy across the globe and has high population growth rate. Based on Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2017-18 data and by covering a sample of 12339 ever-married females, the study intends to investigate the correlates of family planning services use in Pakistan as well as the use of contraceptives across the regions and districts of Pakistan. An exploration of 34 studies (spanning over a time from 1989 to 2021), specifically on Pakistan, with respect to family planning services utilization, have found that the use of family planning services was an outcome of a woman’s education, awareness status, wealth or economic status, religion, husband’s approval, area of residence, number of living children, prevalence of the desired family planning method, desire for more children, subsidized healthcare services and other social or individual factors. In Pakistan, the average contraceptive use rate was recorded as between 19-49 percent across the regions and between 0-71 percent across the districts. The region Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) had the highest contraceptive usage rate, i.e., 49%, followed by: Punjab (42%), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) and Gilgit Baltistan (39% each), Sindh and Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) (34% each), Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) (24%), and Balochistan (19%). Amongst the districts, top three districts with highest contraceptive usage were Jafarabad, Sheikhupura and Jhang whereas the districts of Rajanpur, Tor Ghar and Kohlu were lying at the bottom. Region-wise disaggregation found that in the province of Punjab and Sindh, the range of contraceptive use across the districts was respectively ranged between 0-70 percent and 8-60 percent. Likewise, in KPK and Balochistan provinces, the range of contraceptive use had been recorded between 0-59 percent and between 2-71 percent. While the range of contraceptive use in Gilgit-Baltistan, FATA region, and in AJK had been respectively recorded between 9-48 percent, 11-39 percent, and 17-47 percent.

Suggested Citation

  • Komal Urooj & Tusawar Iftikhar Ahmad & Muhammad Azhar Bhatti & Altaf Hussain, 2022. "Drivers of Family Planning Services Utilization in Pakistan: A Literature Survey and Recent Trends in Contraceptive Use," iRASD Journal of Economics, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 4(2), pages 275-295, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ani:irdjoe:v:4:y:2022:i:2:p:275-295
    DOI: 10.52131/joe.2022.0402.0079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.internationalrasd.org/index.php/joe/article/view/775/488
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.internationalrasd.org/index.php/joe/article/view/775
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.52131/joe.2022.0402.0079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hina Raheel & Mehtab S Karim & Sarah Saleem & Sulaiman Bharwani, 2012. "Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Contraception among Afghan Refugee Women in Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-7, November.
    2. Pedro Mira & Namkee Ahn, 2002. "A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 15(4), pages 667-682.
    3. M. Framurz K. Kiani, 2003. "Motivation and Involvement of Men in Family Planning in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 42(3), pages 197-217.
    4. Khan, Safdar Ullah & Awan, Rabia, 2011. "Contextual Assessment of Women Empowerment and Its Determinants: Evidence from Pakistan," MPRA Paper 30820, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Naushin Mahmood & Karin Ringheim, 1996. "Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 35(1), pages 1-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iram Kamran & Mumraiz Khan & Zeba Tasneem, 2013. "Involving Men in Reproductive and Fertility Issues : Insights from Punjab," World Bank Publications - Reports 16987, The World Bank Group.
    2. Eva Beaujouan & Caroline Berghammer, 2019. "The Gap Between Lifetime Fertility Intentions and Completed Fertility in Europe and the United States: A Cohort Approach," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 38(4), pages 507-535, August.
    3. Marcén, Miriam & Molina, José Alberto & Morales, Marina, 2018. "The effect of culture on the fertility decisions of immigrant women in the United States," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 15-28.
    4. Larry E. Jones & Michele Tertilt, 2006. "An Economic History of Fertility in the U.S.: 1826-1960," NBER Working Papers 12796, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Wen-Yi Chen, 2013. "Does Housing Cost Affect Birth Rates in Taiwan? The ADL Test for Threshold Co-integration," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 90-103, October.
    6. Emilia Del Bono & Andrea Weber & Rudolf Winter-Ebmer, 2012. "Clash Of Career And Family: Fertility Decisions After Job Displacement," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 659-683, August.
    7. Chiara Ludovica Comolli, 2017. "The fertility response to the Great Recession in Europe and the United States: Structural economic conditions and perceived economic uncertainty," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(51), pages 1549-1600.
    8. Do, Quy-Toan & Levchenko, Andrei A. & Raddatz, Claudio, 2016. "Comparative advantage, international trade, and fertility," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 48-66.
    9. Anna Baranowska-Rataj & Anna Matysiak, 2016. "The Causal Effects of the Number of Children on Female Employment - Do European Institutional and Gender Conditions Matter?," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 343-367, September.
    10. Caroline Krafft, 2020. "Why is fertility on the rise in Egypt? The role of women’s employment opportunities," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 1173-1218, October.
    11. Albanesi, Stefania & Olivetti, Claudia & Petrongolo, Barbara, 2022. "Families, labor markets and policy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118038, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Ambra Poggi & Xavier Ramos, 2007. "Empirical Modeling of Deprivation Contagion Among Social Exclusion Dimensions (Using MCMC Methods)," LABORatorio R. Revelli Working Papers Series 59, LABORatorio R. Revelli, Centre for Employment Studies.
    13. John Bryant, 2003. "Demographic Change and New Zealand’s Economic Growth," Treasury Working Paper Series 03/04, New Zealand Treasury.
    14. Del Boca, Daniela & Locatelli, Marilena, 2006. "The Determinants of Motherhood and Work Status: A Survey," IZA Discussion Papers 2414, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Eliane El Badaoui & Eleonora Matteazzi, 2014. "To be a Mother, or not to be? Career and Wage Ladder in Italy and the UK," Working Papers hal-04141331, HAL.
    16. Angela Luci-Greulich & Olivier Thévenon, 2013. "The Impact of Family Policies on Fertility Trends in Developed Countries," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 29(4), pages 387-416, November.
    17. Matthias Doepke & Anne Hannusch & Fabian Kindermann & Michèle Tertilt, 2022. "The Economics of Fertility: A New Era," NBER Working Papers 29948, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Tatiana Karabchuk, 2020. "Job Instability and Fertility Intentions of Young Adults in Europe: Does Labor Market Legislation Matter?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 688(1), pages 225-245, March.
    19. Patrick McGregor & Patricia McKee, 2016. "Religion and Fertility in Contemporary Northern Ireland," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 32(4), pages 599-622, October.
    20. Matthias Fahn & Ray Rees, 2011. "Household Relational Contracts for Marriage, Fertility and Divorce," CESifo Working Paper Series 3655, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ani:irdjoe:v:4:y:2022:i:2:p:275-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Muhammad Abrar ul Haq (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.internationalrasd.org/index.php/joe/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.