IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alu/journl/v2y2013i15p2.html

Integrated Methods For Performance Measurement In Entities From The Wine Sector In Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Sorin Briciu
  • Dan Ioan Topor
  • Sorinel CăpuÅŸneanu

Abstract

This article highlights the authors attempt to identify modern cost calculation methods and appropriate performance measurement tools and their integration in order to improve the performance of the economic entities from the wine sector in Romania. Identifying methods and tools for performance measurement are based on an analysis of a representative sample of specialists from the economic entities from wine sector in Romania. The article is littered with empirical studies designed to highlight the performance of the economic entities from the wine sector based on using the integrated methods such as Activity Based Costing (ABC) method and Balance Scorecard (BS) method. All the results obtained based on the specific methodology of the methods studied are analyzed by the authors. The article ends with the conclusions of the authors on using integrated methods for measuring performance in the entities from the wine sector in Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • Sorin Briciu & Dan Ioan Topor & Sorinel CăpuÅŸneanu, 2013. "Integrated Methods For Performance Measurement In Entities From The Wine Sector In Romania," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(15), pages 1-2.
    • Handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:15:p:2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://oeconomica.uab.ro/upload/lucrari/1520132/02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chenhall, Robert H. & Langfield-Smith, Kim, 2007. "Multiple Perspectives of Performance Measures," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 266-282, August.
    2. Robert S. Kaplan, 2010. "Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard," Harvard Business School Working Papers 10-074, Harvard Business School.
    3. Dan Topor & Sorinel Căpuşneanu & Alina Puţan, 2012. "Evolution And Performance Analysis For Wine Entities In Romania," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(14), pages 1-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alam Zeb & Shabir Ahmad & Gohar Saeed, 2018. "Leadership Effectiveness and Organizational Performance: Exploring Gaps in the Existing Literature," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 10(1), pages 95-106, March.
    2. Kyriaki Papadopoulou, 2020. "Comparative Review Of Performance Measurement Methods Effectiveness," Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics, SOUTH-WEST UNIVERSITY "NEOFIT RILSKI", BLAGOEVGRAD, vol. 17(1), pages 127-139.
    3. Maxwell Sandada & Nigel Manzanga & Roy Shamhuyenhanzva, 2015. "How Do Board Characteristics Influence Business Performance? Evidence from Non-life Insurance Firms in Zimbabwe," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 11(4), pages 103-116, August.
    4. Natalia Semenova, 2021. "Management control systems in response to social and environmental risk in large Nordic companies," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Nguyen Thi Duc Nguyen & Atsushi Aoyama, 2014. "Impact of Corporate Culture on the Relationship between Efficient Technology Transfer and Business Performance," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(4), pages 637-661, December.
    6. David Carassus & Damien Gardey & Christophe Maurel, 2011. "Les démarches locales de performance publique face à la LOLF : mimétisme ou innovation ?," Post-Print hal-02431106, HAL.
    7. Julio Cesar Ferro de Guimarães & Eliana Andréa Severo & César Ricardo Maia de Vasconcelos, 2017. "Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Survey of Companies in Southern Brazil," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(3), pages 352-367, May.
    8. Hoque, Zahirul, 2014. "20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 33-59.
    9. Korneta Piotr, 2020. "Stakeholders and Performance Management Systems of Small and Medium-Sized Outpatient Clinics," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 211-222, January.
    10. Jurevičienė Daiva & Rauličkis Darius, 2016. "Identification of Indicators’ Applicability to Settle Borrowers’ Probability of Default," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 53-64, June.
    11. Langevin, Pascal & Mendoza, Carla, 2013. "How can management control system fairness reduce managers’ unethical behaviours?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 209-222.
    12. Bashar Barakat & Marwan Milhem & Gehad Mohammed Ahmed Naji & Mohammed Alzoraiki & Habsah Binti Muda & Ali Ateeq & Zahida Abro, 2023. "Assessing the Impact of Green Training on Sustainable Business Advantage: Exploring the Mediating Role of Green Supply Chain Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Mohammed Issah & Samuel Antwi, 2017. "Role of macroeconomic variables on firms’ performance: Evidence from the UK," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1405581-140, January.
    14. Artz, Martin & Homburg, Christian & Rajab, Thomas, 2012. "Performance-measurement system design and functional strategic decision influence: The role of performance-measure properties," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 445-460.
    15. Maria José Gomes & António Sousa & Jorge Novas & Ricardo Vinícius Dias Jordão, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability in Viticulture as a Balanced Scorecard Perspective of the Wine Industry: Evidence for the Portuguese Region of Alentejo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    16. Hui Shan Loh & Vinh V. Thai, 2016. "Managing port-related supply chain disruptions (PSCDs): a management model and empirical evidence," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 436-455, May.
    17. Jugović Tijana & Maričić Milica, 2024. "How did Hotels Measure Performance during Covid-19? Insights from Central and Eastern Europe," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 201-225.
    18. Joseph Ouma Osewe & Dr. Hazel Gachunga & Dr. Thomas Senaji & Prof. Romanus Odhiambo, 2018. "Relationship Between Rational Choice Rationale For Adoption Of Balanced Scorecard And Organizational Performance Of State Corporations In Kenya," European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, International Peer Review Journals and Books, vol. 3(1), pages 1-14.
    19. Iulian Bogdan Dobra & Florina Laura Sandru, 2016. "Analytical Overview on the Romanian Dairy Market in the Context of Economic Changes," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 2(4), pages 172-186, December.
    20. Okwir, Simon & Ulfvengren, Pernilla & Angelis, Jannis & Ruiz, Felipe & Núñez Guerrero, Yilsy Maria, 2017. "Managing turnaround performance through Collaborative Decision Making," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 183-196.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:15:p:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan-Constantin Danuletiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.