IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aif/journl/v15y2022i1p167-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Organization Capabilities on the Performance of Commercial State Corporations in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Agaba Sedrick Echongu

    (Master of Business Administration, Kenyatta University.)

  • Dr. Elias Njagi

    (Department of Business Administration, Kenyatta University.)

Abstract

The commercial state corporations in Kenya have faced a turbulent period that has seen previous blue-chip companies such as Mumias Sugar, Kenya Airways, Telkom Kenya, and National Bank falter in terms of their performance. Despite the restructuring of state parastatals and the continuous government bailout, there has been little improvement in the performance of state-owned corporations. The available literature has focussed on their performance from multidimensional constructs. However, there is scanty evidence on how organization capabilities affect the performance of commercial state corporations. The current study sought to establish the effect of innovative capabilities and resource capabilities. The research was anchored on the dynamic capabilities’ theory and the theory of the firm. The research employed a descriptive cross-sectional research design with the unit of analysis being the 50 commercial state corporations in Kenya. The study used a census survey of 150 respondents. Data was collected by the use of semi-structured questionnaires, employing a mix of drop and pick methods as well as google forms to collect the data. The collected research data were analyzed using descriptive, inferential statistics, and correlational statistics. The results were presented using charts and tables. Findings revealed the research was able to obtain a 71% response rate, with 29% of the sample respondents not being able to respond. Correlation tests established there is a positive association between innovative capabilities, resource capabilities and performance of commercial state corporations. The study established that there is a positive and significant effect of organization capabilities on state corporations’ performance in Kenya. Specifically, the study revealed that innovative capabilities, resource capabilities, have a positive and statistically significant influence on the performance of commercial state corporations. The study recommended that organizations would also institute compensations and rewards to encourage innovative ideas from employees in different departments. The study recommended that the management ensures that they have adequate qualified personnel to improve strategy execution within their respective firms. The study also recommends that coordination functions be centralized to ensure timely detection of unexpected events.

Suggested Citation

  • Agaba Sedrick Echongu & Dr. Elias Njagi, 2022. "Influence of Organization Capabilities on the Performance of Commercial State Corporations in Kenya," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 15(1), pages 167-178.
    • Handle: RePEc:aif:journl:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:167-178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/wp-content/uploads/2016.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ijsab.com/volume-15-issue-1/5346
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott L. Newbert, 2007. "Empirical research on the resource‐based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 121-146, February.
    2. Samwel Macharia Chege & Daoping Wang & Shaldon Leparan Suntu, 2020. "Impact of information technology innovation on firm performance in Kenya," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 316-345, April.
    3. Damanpour, Fariborz & Aravind, Deepa, 2012. "Managerial Innovation: Conceptions, Processes and Antecedents," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 423-454, July.
    4. Esther Wanjugu Gitundu & Sifunjo E. Kisaka & Symon Kibet Kiprop & Lawrence Kangogo Kibet, 2016. "The Effects of Ownership and Corporate Governance Reforms on Efficiency of Privatized Companies in Kenya," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(1), pages 323-331.
    5. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    6. Mbako Mbo & Charles Adjasi, 2017. "Drivers of organizational performance in state owned enterprises," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 66(3), pages 405-423, March.
    7. Ortega, María José Ruiz, 2010. "Competitive strategies and firm performance: Technological capabilities' moderating roles," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(12), pages 1273-1281, December.
    8. Astrachan, Joseph H., 2010. "Strategy in family business: Toward a multidimensional research agenda," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 6-14, March.
    9. Fariborz Damanpour & Deepa Aravind, 2012. "Managerial Innovation: Conceptions, Processes, and Antecedents," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 8(2), pages 423-454, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Kallmuenzer & Ursula Scholl-Grissemann, 2017. "Disentangling antecedents and performance effects of family SME innovation: A knowledge-based perspective," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 1117-1138, December.
    2. Khosravi, Pouria & Newton, Cameron & Rezvani, Azadeh, 2019. "Management innovation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of past decades of research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 694-707.
    3. Ferreira, Jorge & Coelho, Arnaldo & Moutinho, Luiz, 2020. "Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    4. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen & Aguado-Moralejo, Itziar & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick, 2022. "Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Tavassoli, Sam & Karlsson, Charlie, 2021. "The role of location on complexity of firms’ innovation outcome," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    6. Donbesuur, Francis & Ampong, George Oppong Appiagyei & Owusu-Yirenkyi, Diana & Chu, Irene, 2020. "Technological innovation, organizational innovation and international performance of SMEs: The moderating role of domestic institutional environment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Lurdes Barroso Simao & Luísa Cagica Carvalho & Maria José Madeira, 2021. "Intellectual structure of management innovation: bibliometric analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 651-677, July.
    8. Aboobucker Ilmudeen, 2022. "Leveraging IT-enabled dynamic capabilities to shape business process agility and firm innovative capability: moderating role of turbulent environment," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(8), pages 2341-2379, November.
    9. Pino, Cesar & Felzensztein, Christian & Zwerg-Villegas, Anne Marie & Arias-Bolzmann, Leopoldo, 2016. "Non-technological innovations: Market performance of exporting firms in South America," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4385-4393.
    10. Ashish Varma & Kaushal Bhalotia & Karan Gambhir, 2020. "Innovating for competitive advantage: managerial risk-taking ability counterbalances management controls," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(2), pages 389-409, June.
    11. Grillitsch, Markus & Schubert, Torben & Srholec, Martin, 2019. "Knowledge base combinations and firm growth," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 234-247.
    12. Lai, Kee-hung & Feng, Yunting & Zhu, Qinghua, 2023. "Digital transformation for green supply chain innovation in manufacturing operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    13. Naciba Haned & Caroline Mothe & Thuc Uyen Nguyen-Thi, 2014. "Firm persistence in technological innovation: the relevance of organizational innovation," Post-Print halshs-01496526, HAL.
    14. Nils Grashof, 2020. "Sinking or swimming in the cluster labour pool? A firm-specific analysis of the effect of specialized labour," Jena Economics Research Papers 2020-006, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    15. Jim Andersén, 2023. "Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5506-5520, December.
    16. Gianluca Misuraca & Clelia Colombo & Csaba Kucsera & Stephanie Carretero & Margherita Bacigalupo & Raluca Radescu, 2015. "ICT-enabled Social Innovation in support of the Implementation of the Social Investment Package (IESI) - Mapping and Analysis of ICT-enabled Social Innovation Initiatives promoting Social Investment t," JRC Research Reports JRC97467, Joint Research Centre.
    17. Dimitrios Kafetzopoulos & Evangelos Psomas, 2016. "ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING, NON-TECHNICAL INNOVATION AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Liu, Yulong & Yu, Yang, 2018. "Institutions, firm resources and the foreign establishment mode choices of Chinese firms: The moderating role of home regional institutional development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 111-121.
    19. Yu, Chuanpeng & Wang, Yue & Li, Tianchen & Lin, Chunpei, 2022. "Do top management teams’ expectations and support drive management innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 88-99.
    20. Ludivine Calamel & Denis Chabault, 2020. "The Role of Proximities in the Construction of Managerial Innovation in a Collaborative Context," Post-Print hal-04446126, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aif:journl:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:167-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Farjana Rahman (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.