IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aid/journl/v8y2025i2p124-150.html

Advanced GARCH Specifications for Cryptocurrency Volatility Incorporating Asymmetry, Regime-Switching, and Long-Memory Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Tomas Peciulis

    (Department of Economics Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Asta Vasiliauskaite

    (Institute of Business and Economics, Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile, creating challenges for accurate risk management and forecasting. As digital assets become more integrated into financial systems, understanding their volatility dynamics is essential for investors and policymakers. Previous research has primarily applied standard GARCH models to cryptocurrencies, often neglecting advanced specifications that capture asymmetry, regime-switching, and long-memory effects. This limits the accuracy of volatility forecasts and fails to reflect the unique behaviour of digital assets. This study aims to identify the most effective GARCH-class models for forecasting volatility in Bitcoin, Ethereum, Binance Coin, and Ripple. We analyse daily returns from August 2017 to December 2024, applying eight advanced GARCH specifications: EGARCH, GJR-GARCH, FIGARCH, HYGARCH, MSGARCH, CS-GARCH, and Log-GARCH. Hyperparameter tuning is conducted via grid search across lag orders (p, q ∈ [1, 5]), mean equations, and error distributions. Model performance is evaluated using AIC, BIC, RMSE, and MAE. Results show that MSGARCH and EGARCH outperform symmetric and short-memory models, highlighting the importance of regime-switching and leverage effects. FIGARCH provides the best fit for Bitcoin and Ethereum, confirming long-memory persistence. Skewed Student’s t and GED distributions improve accuracy by capturing heavy tails and asymmetry. These findings demonstrate the limitations of standard GARCH models and underscore the value of advanced specifications in modelling cryptocurrency volatility. The study offers practical insights for traders and risk managers, contributing to more robust forecasting in non-stationary markets. Advanced GARCH models significantly enhance volatility prediction for digital assets. Future research could extend this framework to other speculative instruments or integrate machine learning techniques to further improve performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomas Peciulis & Asta Vasiliauskaite, 2025. "Advanced GARCH Specifications for Cryptocurrency Volatility Incorporating Asymmetry, Regime-Switching, and Long-Memory Effects," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 8(2), pages 124-150, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:aid:journl:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:124-150
    DOI: 10.34021/ve.2025.08.02(5)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.virtual-economics.eu/index.php/VE/article/download/487/193
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.34021/ve.2025.08.02(5)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Jing-Zhi & Ni, Jun & Xu, Li, 2022. "Leverage effect in cryptocurrency markets," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Panagiotidis, Theodore & Papapanagiotou, Georgios & Stengos, Thanasis, 2022. "On the volatility of cryptocurrencies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Mrestyal Khan & Maaz Khan, 2021. "Cryptomarket Volatility in Times of COVID-19 Pandemic: Application of GARCH Models," Economic Research Guardian, Mutascu Publishing, vol. 11(2), pages 170-181, December.
    4. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986. "Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 307-327, April.
    5. Hemendra Gupta & Rashmi Chaudhary, 2022. "An Empirical Study of Volatility in Cryptocurrency Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Elie Bouri & Ladislav Kristoufek & Tanveer Ahmad & Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad, 2024. "Microstructure noise and idiosyncratic volatility anomalies in cryptocurrencies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 334(1), pages 547-573, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan, Stephen & Chandrashekhar, Durga & Almazloum, Ward & Zhang, Yuanyuan & Lord, Nicholas & Osterrieder, Joerg & Chu, Jeffrey, 2024. "Stylized facts of metaverse non-fungible tokens," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 653(C).
    2. Aharon, David Y. & Butt, Hassan Anjum & Jaffri, Ali & Nichols, Brian, 2023. "Asymmetric volatility in the cryptocurrency market: New evidence from models with structural breaks," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Sera Şanlı & Mehmet Balcılar & Mehmet Özmen, 2025. "Predicting the volatility of Bitcoin returns based on kernel regression," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 352(3), pages 505-542, September.
    4. Çağlar SÖZEN, 2025. "Volatility dynamics of cryptocurrencies: a comparative analysis using GARCH-family models," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Suleiman Dahir Mohamed & Mohd Tahir Ismail & Majid Khan Bin Majahar Ali, 2025. "Improving and evaluating GARCH-type models for Bitcoin volatility prediction," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 1219-1260, December.
    6. Hauzenberger, Niko & Huber, Florian & Klieber, Karin & Marcellino, Massimiliano, 2025. "Bayesian neural networks for macroeconomic analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 249(PC).
    7. Pieter J. van der Sluis, 1997. "Post-Sample Prediction Tests for the Efficient Method of Moments," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 97-054/4, Tinbergen Institute.
    8. Camilo Serrano & Martin Hoesli, 2010. "Are Securitized Real Estate Returns more Predictable than Stock Returns?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 170-192, August.
    9. Beran, Jan & Feng, Yuanhua, 1999. "Local Polynomial Estimation with a FARIMA-GARCH Error Process," CoFE Discussion Papers 99/08, University of Konstanz, Center of Finance and Econometrics (CoFE).
    10. Corbet, Shaen & Larkin, Charles & McMullan, Caroline, 2020. "The impact of industrial incidents on stock market volatility," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    11. Xuedi Li & Jie Ma & Zhu Chen & Haitao Zheng, 2018. "Linkage Analysis among China’s Seven Emissions Trading Scheme Pilots," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, September.
    12. Angelica Gianfreda, 2010. "Volatility and Volume Effects in European Electricity Spot Markets," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 39(1‐2), pages 47-63, February.
    13. Blanka Škrabić Perić & Petar Sorić, 2018. "A Note on the “Economic Policy Uncertainty Index”," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 505-526, June.
    14. Dankenbring, Henning, 1998. "Volatility estimates of the short term interest rate with an application to German data," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1998,96, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    15. Cho, Guedae & Kim, MinKyoung & Koo, Won W., 2003. "Relative Agricultural Price Changes In Different Time Horizons," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22249, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Minot, Nicholas, 2014. "Food price volatility in sub-Saharan Africa: Has it really increased?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 45-56.
    17. Umar, Muhammad & Mirza, Nawazish & Rizvi, Syed Kumail Abbas & Furqan, Mehreen, 2023. "Asymmetric volatility structure of equity returns: Evidence from an emerging market," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 330-336.
    18. Arif Oduncu, 2011. "The Effects of Currency Futures Trading on Turkish Currency Market," Journal of BRSA Banking and Financial Markets, Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency, vol. 5(1), pages 97-109.
    19. Shively, Gerald E., 2001. "Price thresholds, price volatility, and the private costs of investment in a developing country grain market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 399-414, August.
    20. Lahmiri, Salim & Bekiros, Stelios, 2017. "Disturbances and complexity in volatility time series," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 38-42.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aid:journl:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:124-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aleksy Kwilinski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/akwilin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.