IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/thkase/406294.html

Assessing Energy Security in South Asia: A Composite Index Approach Incorporating Governance, Sustainability, and Socioeconomic Dimensions

Author

Listed:
  • Akhtar, Munazza
  • Ilyas, Muhammad
  • Ahmad, Ashfaq

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Energy security extends beyond resource availability and affordability to encompass governance, environmental sustainability, and socioeconomic dimensions that are critical for sustainable development. In South Asia, rising energy demand, rapid population growth, and urbanization are intensifying pressure on limited energy resources. A comprehensive assessment of energy security helps identify structural weaknesses, including import dependence, inefficient energy use, and unequal access to modern energy services across countries such as Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and Sri Lanka. It also provides insights into institutional effectiveness, environmental performance, and the long-term resilience of energy systems. Accordingly, this study develops a multifaceted energy security index for South Asian countries over the period 2001–2022.Methodology: Data suitability is assessed using the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure and Bartlett’s test of sphericity. A KMO value above 0.05 indicates adequate sampling, while a significant Bartlett’s test (p < 0.05) confirms sufficient correlations for factor analysis. Internal consistency among indicators is evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha (acceptable range: 0.7–0.9). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is then applied to reduce dimensionality and extract latent components. Component weights are derived from eigenvalues, reflecting their contribution to total variance. The Min–Max normalization method is used to standardize variables, which are subsequently aggregated into a composite index based on weighted components.Key Findings: The results indicate strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.733) and high sampling adequacy (KMO = 0.863), with Bartlett’s test confirming significant inter-item correlations. The PCA yields a Multifaceted Energy Security Index (MFESI) comprising eight dimensions: energy sustainability, governance and efficiency, socio-environmental sustainability, affordability, energy access, human resilience, energy transition, and labor market dynamics. The index rankings show that India leads in overall energy security, followed by Pakistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, and Nepal. Classification into four categories, Poor (1–2.5), Fair (2.5–5.0), Good (5.0–7.5), and Excellent (7.5–10) reveals that most countries fall within the “Fair” range. Dimension-wise analysis highlights India’s strength in sustainability and renewable energy, Bhutan’s strong governance performance but weak sustainability, and Pakistan’s strengths in socio-environmental sustainability alongside affordability challenges. Nepal consistently ranks lowest in governance and resilience, indicating structural constraints.Policy Implications: The findings highlight significant regional disparities in energy security and underscore the need for coordinated policy responses. Strengthening regional cooperation through cross-border electricity trade and renewable energy collaboration is essential. Policy priorities include improving affordability through targeted subsidies and tariff reforms, enhancing climate-resilient energy infrastructure, and promoting institutional reforms. Country-specific strategies suggest improving governance and affordability in Pakistan, enhancing human resilience and sustainability in India, expanding energy access in Bangladesh, diversifying energy sources in Bhutan and Nepal, and strengthening governance and renewable energy development in Sri Lanka. These measures are critical for achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 7, 13, and 16.

Suggested Citation

  • Akhtar, Munazza & Ilyas, Muhammad & Ahmad, Ashfaq, 2026. "Assessing Energy Security in South Asia: A Composite Index Approach Incorporating Governance, Sustainability, and Socioeconomic Dimensions," Asian Journal of Applied Economics, Kasetsart University, Center for Applied Economics Research, vol. 33(2), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:thkase:406294
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.406294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/406294/files/05.Vol33Issue2_330205.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.406294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Mukherjee, Ishani, 2011. "Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 5343-5355.
    2. Fahad Bin Abdullah & Rizwan Iqbal & Sadique Ahmad & Mohammed A. El-Affendi & Pardeep Kumar, 2022. "Optimization of Multidimensional Energy Security: An Index Based Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siksnelyte-Butkiene, Indre & Streimikiene, Dalia & Lekavicius, Vidas & Balezentis, Tomas, 2024. "Comprehensive analysis of energy security indicators and measurement of their integrity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Kang, Duan, 2024. "The establishment of evaluation systems and an index for energy superpower," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    3. Getao Hu & Jun Yang & Jun Li, 2022. "The Dynamic Evolution of Global Energy Security and Geopolitical Games: 1995~2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Andrew Chapman & Timothy Fraser & Melanie Dennis, 2019. "Investigating Ties between Energy Policy and Social Equity Research: A Citation Network Analysis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Nyga-Łukaszewska Honorata & Napiórkowski Tomasz M., 2023. "Energy security as a source of international competitiveness in new EU member states," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 59(3), pages 209-224, September.
    6. Pin Li & Jinsuo Zhang, 2019. "Is China’s Energy Supply Sustainable? New Research Model Based on the Exponential Smoothing and GM(1,1) Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    7. He, Peijun & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin, 2019. "Energy-economic resilience with multi-region input–output linear programming models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Zeng, Shouzhen & Streimikiene, Dalia & Baležentis, Tomas, 2017. "Review of and comparative assessment of energy security in Baltic States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 185-192.
    9. Li, Pin & He, Qi & Zhang, Jinsuo & Xia, Qiyuan, 2024. "Analyzing the impact of energy synergy and renewable energy generation on energy security: Empirical evidence from China's Yangtze River Delta region," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    10. Geng, Jiang-Bo & Ji, Qiang, 2014. "Multi-perspective analysis of China's energy supply security," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 541-550.
    11. Erahman, Qodri Febrilian & Purwanto, Widodo Wahyu & Sudibandriyo, Mahmud & Hidayatno, Akhmad, 2016. "An assessment of Indonesia's energy security index and comparison with seventy countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 364-376.
    12. Huang, Beijia & Zhang, Long & Ma, Linmao & Bai, Wuliyasu & Ren, Jingzheng, 2021. "Multi-criteria decision analysis of China’s energy security from 2008 to 2017 based on Fuzzy BWM-DEA-AR model and Malmquist Productivity Index," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    13. Wabukala, Benard M. & Bergland, Olvar & Otim, Jacob & Elasu, Joseph & Muwanga, Robert & Adaramola, Muyiwa S., 2025. "Keeping the lights on: Assessing energy dynamics and electricity security in Uganda," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(C).
    14. Linda Hancock & Linda Wollersheim, 2021. "EU Carbon Diplomacy: Assessing Hydrogen Security and Policy Impact in Australia and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, December.
    15. Gunnarsdottir, I. & Davidsdottir, B. & Worrell, E. & Sigurgeirsdottir, S., 2022. "Indicators for sustainable energy development: An Icelandic case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    16. Johansson, Bengt & Jonsson, Daniel K. & Veibäck, Ester & Sonnsjö, Hannes, 2016. "Assessing the capabilites to manage risks in energy systems–analytical perspectives and frameworks with a starting point in Swedish experiences," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 429-435.
    17. Honorata Nyga-Łukaszewska & Kentaka Aruga & Katarzyna Stala-Szlugaj, 2020. "Energy Security of Poland and Coal Supply: Price Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Evgeny Lisin & Wadim Strielkowski & Veronika Chernova & Alena Fomina, 2018. "Assessment of the Territorial Energy Security in the Context of Energy Systems Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Mujjuni, F. & Betts, T. & To, L.S. & Blanchard, R.E., 2021. "Resilience a means to development: A resilience assessment framework and a catalogue of indicators," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    20. Cambero, Claudia & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2014. "Assessment and optimization of forest biomass supply chains from economic, social and environmental perspectives – A review of literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 62-73.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:thkase:406294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/darkuth.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.