IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/sojoae/29770.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acreage Planting Decision Analysis Of South Carolina Tomatoes: Nerlovian Versus Just Risk Model

Author

Listed:
  • Fu, Tsu-Tan
  • Fletcher, Stanley M.
  • Epperson, James E.

Abstract

Factors which explain supply response behavior of South Carolina tomato growers were determined. Two well known supply response models were used for comparison: the Nerlovian structural model and the Just risk model. The Just risk model reflected the significance of the risk effect in both stable and unstable periods. An evaluation of forecasting power between the two models was indeterminate. Growers are apparently willing to invest in more information with increased market instability because growers were influenced by the Florida winter price of tomatoes in planting decisions during the period of instability.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu, Tsu-Tan & Fletcher, Stanley M. & Epperson, James E., 1986. "Acreage Planting Decision Analysis Of South Carolina Tomatoes: Nerlovian Versus Just Risk Model," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-7, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:29770
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.29770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/29770/files/18020065.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.29770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wells, Gary J., 1980. "Forecasting South Carolina Tomato Prices Prior to Planting," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 109-112, July.
    2. Eckstein, Zvi, 1984. "A Rational Expectations Model of Agricultural Supply," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 92(1), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Andrew Schmitz & Haim Shalit & Stephen J. Turnovsky, 1981. "Producer Welfare and the Preference for Price Stability," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(1), pages 157-160.
    4. Wells, Gary J., 1980. "Forecasting South Carolina Tomato Prices Prior To Planting," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 12(1), pages 1-4, July.
    5. Dhrymes, Phoebus J & Klein, Lawrence R & Steiglitz, Kenneth, 1970. "Estimation of Distributed Lags," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 11(2), pages 235-250, June.
    6. William Lin, 1977. "Measuring Aggregate Supply Response under Instability," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 59(5), pages 903-907.
    7. Lin, William, 1977. "Measuring Aggregate Supply Response Under Instability," 1977 AAEA-WAEA Joint Meeting, July 31-August 3, San Diego, California 283678, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Rulon D. Pope, 1981. "Supply Response and the Dispersion of Price Expectations," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(1), pages 161-163.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Griffiths, William E. & Anderson, Jock R., 1978. "Specification Of Agricultural Supply Functions - Empirical Evidence On Wheat In Southern N.S.W," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 22(2-3), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Julie SUBERVIE, 2006. "The impact of world price instability on agricultural supply according to several macroeconomic factors," Working Papers 200604, CERDI.
    3. Van Kooten, G. C. & Spriggs, John & Schmitz, Andrew, 1989. "The Impact of Canadian Commodity Stabilization Programs on Risk Reduction and the Supply of Agricultural Commodities," Working Papers 244037, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    4. Brorsen, B. Wade & Grant, Warren R. & Richardson, James W. & Schnake, L.D., 1984. "Impacts Of Price Variability On Marketing Margins And Producer Viability In The Texas Wheat Industry," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Winter, John R. & Whittaker, James K., 1979. "Estimation Of Wheat Acreage Response Functions For The Northwest," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-6, December.
    6. Lee, Young-Jae & Kennedy, P. Lynn, 2013. "An Examination of the Crop Acreage Allocation Decision Process under Uncertainty," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 3(02), pages 1-10, February.
    7. Pope, Rulon D. & LaFrance, Jeffrey T. & Just, Richard E., 2011. "Agricultural arbitrage and risk preferences," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 35-43, May.
    8. Patrick GUILLAUMONT, 2000. "On the Economic Vulnerability of Low Income Countries," Working Papers 200016, CERDI.
    9. Robison, Lindon & Carman, Garth, 1979. "Aggregate Risk Response Models And Market Equilibrium," Risk Management in Agriculture: Behavioral, Managerial, and Policy Issues, January 25-26, 1979, San Francisco, California 271467, Regional Research Projects > W-149: An Economic Evaluation of Managing Market Risks in Agriculture.
    10. Jean-Claude Nascimento & Marc Raffinot, 1985. "Politique de prix agricoles et comportement des producteurs : le cas de l'arachide au Sénégal," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 36(4), pages 779-796.
    11. Najafi, Bahaeddin & Bakhshoodeh, Mohamad, 2002. "Effectiveness of Government Protective Policies on Rice Production in Iran," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24922, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Jeon, Jong-Pyeong, 1989. "The impacts of policy alternatives and foreign demand fluctuations on the US rice market," ISU General Staff Papers 1989010108000010204, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    13. Mbaga, Msafiri Daudi & Coyle, Barry T., 2003. "Beef Supply Response Under Uncertainty: An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(3), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Holt, Matthew T. & Aradhyula, Satheesh V., 1991. "Endogenous Risk in a Rational-Expectation Model of the U.S. Broiler Market: A Multivariate Arch-M Approach," Staff Papers 200538, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    15. Musser, Wesley N. & Stamoulis, Kostas G., 1980. "Risk Transfer And Commodity Programs," Risk Analysis in Agriculture: Research and Educational Developments, January 16-18, 1980, Tucson, Arizona 271565, Regional Research Projects > W-149: An Economic Evaluation of Managing Market Risks in Agriculture.
    16. Meilke, Karl D. & Weersink, Alfons, 1991. "An Analysis of the Effects of Government Payments to Grain and Oilseeds Producers on Cropping Decisions," Working Papers 244081, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    17. J.‐P. Chavas & A. F. Kraus, 1990. "Population Dynamics And Milk Supply Response In The Us Lake States," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 75-84, January.
    18. Lin, William W. & Dismukes, Robert, 2005. "Risk Considerations in Supply Response: Implications for Counter-Cyclical Payments' Production Impact," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19304, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Khor, Ling Yee & Zeller, Manfred, 2012. "Doubts on input quality: The effect of inaccurate fertilizer content on the estimation of production functions and technical efficiency," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126212, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Bezemer, Dirk J., 2004. "Risk and agricultural de-collectivisation, with evidence from the Czech Republic," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 13-33, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:29770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.