IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/polgne/358707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Struktura rynku pracy w świetle ekonomii instytucjonalnej

Author

Listed:
  • Woźniak-Jęchorek, Beata

Abstract

The article focuses on the institutional structure of the labor market as seen through the lens of institutional economics. Institutional economics assumes that there is an interaction between people and organizations and examines the rules of this interaction. It argues that economic analysis should be interdisciplinary and focus on social, cultural, political and historical aspects. This is especially important for the analysis of the modern labor market, where cultural factors play a major role, the author says. These theoretical findings combined with the current situation on the labor market lead the author to formulate an assumption that labor market studies failing to take into account formal and informal institutions may result in an incomplete picture of the labor market. That is why the main objective of the article is to define the institutional structure of the labor market, the author says. The paper presents the assumptions of institutional economics, describes the institutional approach used in labor market studies, and defines the concept of labor market institutions. The author discusses the structure of the labor market by referring to the concept of different levels of economic analysis developed by O.E. Williamson, a proponent of new institutional economics. Using Williamson’s findings, Woźniak-Jęchorek sets out to identify relationships between different levels of economic analysis in the context of labor market functioning. The proposed theoretical model introduces the concept of the social value of work, assuming that informal and formal institutions influence the perception of the value of work and determine the behavior of people on the labor market. The value of work is evaluated from different angles, including an economic perspective (individuals have to work to earn money for a living), a social perspective (individuals need social interaction and integration), and a task-based perspective (individuals need to achieve objectives by completing tasks). Each perspective determines the behavior of people on the labor market. In classical terms, the value of work is reflected in wage disparities, but today there is a growing need for a mixed approach combining economic, social, and ecological values, Woźniak-Jęchorek says. Defining the institutional structure of the labor market is a starting point for further empirical research that could contribute to a more effective government policy toward the labor market, the author concludes.

Suggested Citation

  • Woźniak-Jęchorek, Beata, 2013. "Struktura rynku pracy w świetle ekonomii instytucjonalnej," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2013(9), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:polgne:358707
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.358707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/358707/files/Wo%C5%BAniak-J%C4%99chorek.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.358707?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malcolm Rutherford, 2001. "Institutional Economics: Then and Now," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 173-194, Summer.
    2. Malcolm Rutherford, 2000. "Institutionalism Between the Wars," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 291-303, June.
    3. Douglass C. North, 2005. "Introduction to Understanding the Process of Economic Change," Introductory Chapters, in: Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton University Press.
    4. Oliver E. Williamson, 2000. "The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(3), pages 595-613, September.
    5. Rutherford,Malcolm, 1996. "Institutions in Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521574471, Enero-Abr.
    6. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2004. "Institutional Economics: From Menger and Veblen to Coase and North," Chapters, in: John B. Davis & Alain Marciano & Jochen Runde (ed.), The Elgar Companion To Economics and Philosophy, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Malcolm Rutherford, 1994. "Austrian economics and American (old) institutionalism," Chapters, in: Peter J. Boettke (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics, chapter 76, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beata Woźniak-Jęchorek, 2013. "Struktura rynku pracy w świetle ekonomii instytucjonalnej," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 9, pages 5-27.
    2. Angela Ambrosino & Magda Fontana & Anna Azzurra Gigante, 2018. "Shifting Boundaries In Economics: The Institutional Cognitive Strand And The Future Of Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 767-791, July.
    3. Duarte N. Leite & Sandra T. Silva & Oscar Afonso, 2014. "Institutions, Economics And The Development Quest," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 491-515, July.
    4. Luis Alfonso Dau & Aya S. Chacar & Marjorie A. Lyles & Jiatao Li, 2022. "Informal institutions and international business: Toward an integrative research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 985-1010, August.
    5. Luis Alfonso Dau & Jiatao Li & Marjorie A. Lyles & Aya S. Chacar, 2022. "Informal institutions and the international strategy of MNEs: Effects of institutional effectiveness, convergence, and distance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 1257-1281, August.
    6. Gagliardi, Francesca, 2008. "Institutions and economic change: A critical survey of the new institutional approaches and empirical evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 416-443, February.
    7. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2012. "Veblen, Commons and the Theory of the Firm," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Brousseau, Eric & Raynaud, Emmanuel, 2011. "“Climbing the hierarchical ladders of rules”: A life-cycle theory of institutional evolution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 65-79.
    9. Yoon, Hyungseok (David) & Boudreaux, Christopher & Kim, Namil, 2024. "Connecting the dots between democracy and innovation: The role of pro-market institutions and information processing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(8).
    10. Gani, Azmat & Scrimgeour, Frank, 2014. "Modeling governance and water pollution using the institutional ecological economic framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 363-372.
    11. Aparicio, Sebastian & Audretsch, David & Urbano, David, 2021. "Why is export-oriented entrepreneurship more prevalent in some countries than others? Contextual antecedents and economic consequences," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(3).
    12. Leymann, Gunnar & Lundan, Sarianna, 2023. "From structural to transition effects: Institutional dynamism as a deterrent to long-term investments by MNEs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3).
    13. Mauricio G. Villena & Marcelo J. Villena, 2004. "Evolutionary Game Theory and Thorstein Veblen’s Evolutionary Economics: Is EGT Veblenian?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 585-610, September.
    14. Masahiko Aoki, 2013. "Institutions as cognitive media between strategic interactions and individual beliefs," Chapters, in: Comparative Institutional Analysis, chapter 17, pages 298-312, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Galbács, Péter, 2018. "A közgazdaságtan felszabadítása. A neoklasszikus ortodoxia és az intézményi közgazdaságtan közötti ellentét néhány módszertani kérdése [Freedom for economics. Some methodological aspects of the neo," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 44-65.
    16. Yochanan Shachmurove, 2012. "Failing Institutions Are at the Core of the U.S. Financial Crisis," PIER Working Paper Archive 12-040, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    17. Alexander S. Skorobogatov, 2014. "A Provocative Event, Media, And Religious Choice: The Pussy Riot Case As A Natural Experiment," HSE Working papers WP BRP 59/EC/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    18. Aparicio, Sebastian & Urbano, David & Audretsch, David, 2016. "Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 45-61.
    19. Adekola, Olalekan & Grainger, Alan, 2023. "Bottom-up and bottom-top institutional changes in environmental management in the Niger Delta," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    20. Ghulam, Yaseen, 2021. "Institutions and firms’ technological changes and productivity growth," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:polgne:358707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irsghpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.