IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/paaero/410113.html

Wdrażanie Proekologicznych Praktyk W Rolnictwie W Ramach Wspólnej Polityki Rolnej Unii Europejskiej – Perspektywa Regionalna

Author

Listed:
  • KOŁOSZKO-CHOMENTOWSKA, ZOFIA
  • SIECZKO, LESZEK

Abstract

Rosnące wyzwania środowiskowe związane z produkcją rolniczą wymagają wprowadzenia praktyk proekologicznych. Celem badań była identyfikacja i ocena regionalnego zróżnicowania we wdrażaniu praktyk proekologicznych w rolnictwie, z uwzględnieniem wykorzystania funduszy w ramach ekoschematów i poziomu rozwoju rolnictwa ekologicznego w poszczególnych regionach. Oceny dokonano na podstawie danych ARiMR z 2024 roku. Grupowania regionów dokonano na podstawie hierarchicznej analizy skupień i metody Warda. Do identyfikacji głównych czynników różnicujących regiony wykorzystano analizę składowych głównych (PCA). Wyniki badań wskazują na duże zróżnicowanie regionalne w zakresie praktyk proekologicznych w rolnictwie. Oceniając dynamikę wdrażania praktyk przyjaznych środowisku, przez pryzmat rolnictwa ekologicznego, wiodącą pozycję zajmują województwa północnej Polski (podlaskie, warmińsko-mazurskie, zachodniopomorskie), które w ostatnich latach odnotowały najwyższy wzrost powierzchni użytków ekologicznych. Gospodarstwa z regionów o wysokim poziomie rozwoju rolnictwa (dolnośląskie, kujawskopomorskie, wielkopolskie) wykazały większe zaangażowanie w pozyskiwanie środków na działania prośrodowiskowe. W regionach południowej Polski, charakteryzujących się przewagą małych gospodarstw, pozyskiwanie środków finansowych i wdrażanie praktyk korzystnych dla środowiska było ograniczone.

Suggested Citation

  • Kołoszko-Chomentowska, Zofia & Sieczko, Leszek, 2026. "Wdrażanie Proekologicznych Praktyk W Rolnictwie W Ramach Wspólnej Polityki Rolnej Unii Europejskiej – Perspektywa Regionalna," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2026(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:410113
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.410113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/410113/files/10%20%286%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.410113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ait Sidhoum, Amer & Mennig, Philipp & Frick, Fabian, 2024. "Assessing the impact of agri-environmental payments on green productivity in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    2. Tongwane, Mphethe Isaac & Moeletsi, Mokhele Edmond, 2018. "A review of greenhouse gas emissions from the agriculture sector in Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 124-134.
    3. Tania Runge & Uwe Latacz‐Lohmann & Lena Schaller & Kristina Todorova & Carsten Daugbjerg & Mette Termansen & Jaan Liira & Fanny Le Gloux & Pierre Dupraz & Jussi Leppanen & József Fogarasi & Enikő Zita, 2022. "Implementation of Eco‐schemes in Fifteen European Union Member States," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(2), pages 19-27, August.
    4. Song, Cuihong & Gardner, Kevin H. & Klein, Sharon J.W. & Souza, Simone Pereira & Mo, Weiwei, 2018. "Cradle-to-grave greenhouse gas emissions from dams in the United States of America," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 945-956.
    5. Roel Jongeneel & Ana Gonzalez‐Martinez, 2023. "Implementing the EU eco‐scheme in the Netherlands: A results‐based points system approach," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 22(1), pages 20-27, April.
    6. Styburski, Wojciech & Kozera-Kowalska, Magdalena & Uglis, Jaroslaw, 2023. "Ekoschematy jako nowe narzędzie wsparcia rolnictwa – stan realizacji w Polsce," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2023(3).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charissa Bosma & Lars Hein, 2023. "The climate and land use change nexus: Implications for designing adaptation and conservation investment strategies in Sub‐Saharan Africa," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3811-3830, October.
    2. Marta Bengoa & Somya Mathur & Badri Narayanan & Hanna C. Norberg, 2021. "Environmental Effects of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement: A Computable General Equilibrium Model Approach," Journal of African Trade, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 36-48, December.
    3. Jarisch, Isabelle & Bödeker, Kai & Bingham, Logan Robert & Friedrich, Stefan & Kindu, Mengistie & Knoke, Thomas, 2022. "The influence of discounting ecosystem services in robust multi-objective optimization – An application to a forestry-avocado land-use portfolio," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Petra Benyei & Laura Aceituno-Mata & Joana Blanch-Ramirez & Laura Franco & Laura Levy & Antonio Perdomo-Molina & Laura Calvet-Mir, 2025. "From grains to berries: causes and consequences of crop portfolio changes in four mountain agroecosystems in the Iberian Peninsula," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(3), pages 1267-1283, September.
    5. Roel Jongeneel & Marcel van Asseldonk & Cor Graveland, 2025. "The Dutch Point‐based Eco‐scheme: a Transition to a Results‐based Policy," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 24(3), pages 41-50, December.
    6. Seth, Manu & Aparicio, Maria Ubierna & Nakomcic-Smargdakis, Branka & Brboric, Maja & Calamita, Elisa & Dasic, Tina & Santos, Cristina Diez & Patro, Epari Ritesh, 2026. "A review of hydropower reservoir GHG estimation methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    7. Dong-Gill Kim & Elisa Grieco & Antonio Bombelli & Jonathan E. Hickman & Alberto Sanz-Cobena, 2021. "Challenges and opportunities for enhancing food security and greenhouse gas mitigation in smallholder farming in sub-Saharan Africa. A review," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(2), pages 457-476, April.
    8. Gemechu, Eskinder & Kumar, Amit, 2022. "A review of how life cycle assessment has been used to assess the environmental impacts of hydropower energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Oluwafemi Emmanuel Oni & Omowunmi Mary Longe, 2024. "A Study on Electric Vehicle Footprint in South Africa," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-37, December.
    10. Ouvrard, Benjamin & Reynaud, Arnaud, 2026. "Misperception of descriptive norms and adoption of eco-schemes by French farmers," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    11. Lanping Tang & Ge Shen & Min Cheng & Chengchao Zuo & Feiyang Li & Hang Liu & Shaohua Wu, 2024. "Spillover Impacts of the Utilization of Winter Fallow Fields on Grain Production and Carbon Emissions," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Taitiya Kenneth Yuguda & Yi Li & Bobby Shekarau Luka & Goziya William Dzarma, 2020. "Incorporating Reservoir Greenhouse Gas Emissions into Carbon Footprint of Sugar Produced from Irrigated Sugarcane in Northeastern Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Zofia Koloszko-Chomentowska & Leszek Sieczko & Roman Trochimczuk, 2021. "Production Profile of Farms and Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-25, August.
    14. Ober, Carina & Canessa, Carolin & Frick, Fabian & Sauer, Johannes, 2025. "The role of behavioural factors in accepting agri-environmental contracts – Evidence from a Q-method and thematic analysis in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    15. Marek Zieliński & Artur Łopatka & Piotr Koza & Barbara Gołębiewska, 2024. "The Carpathian Agriculture in Poland in Relation to Other EU Countries, Ukraine and the Environmental Goals of the EU CAP 2023–2027," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Lechón, Yolanda & Lago, Carmen & Herrera, Israel & Gamarra, Ana Rosa & Pérula, Alberto, 2023. "Carbon benefits of different energy storage alternative end uses. Application to the Spanish case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    17. Ion V. Ion & Antoaneta Ene, 2021. "Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Reservoirs: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    18. Czyżewski, Bazyli & Matuszczak, Anna & Prandecki, Konrad & Wrzaszcz, Wioletta, 2026. "Food trade-offs in targeting environmental efficiency: Comparative analysis of different agricultural systems under natural constraints," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    19. Lindikaya W. Myeki & Nicolette Matthews & Yonas T. Bahta, 2023. "Decomposition of Green Agriculture Productivity for Policy in Africa: An Application of Global Malmquist–Luenberger Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    20. Reynaud, Arnaud & Ouvrard, Benjamin, 2024. "Re-calibrating beliefs about peers: Direct impacts and cross-learning effects in agriculture," TSE Working Papers 24-1517, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:410113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seriaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.