IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/paaero/348641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizacja i Efektywność Polskich Gospodarstw Ekologicznych w Porównaniu do Konwencjonalnych

Author

Listed:
  • Komorowska, Dorota

Abstract

Celem artykułu jest porównanie i ocena organizacji i efektywności gospodarstw ekologicznych na tle konwencjonalnych, na podstawie danych z gospodarstw objętych rachunkowością rolną w systemie FADN w 2021 roku. Badane gospodarstwa oceniono i porównano w zakresie potencjału produkcyjnego, organizacji, intensywności i wydajności produkcji, wyników produkcyjnych i ekonomicznych oraz efektywności czynników wytwórczych. Zastosowano metody analizy wskaźnikowej. Z badań wynika, że gospodarstwa ekologiczne angażują relatywnie większe nakłady pracy, ale wyraźnie mniejsze środków produkcyjnych w relacji do zasobów ziemi. W związku z tym, poziom intensywności ich produkcji jest wyraźnie niższy, a to znajduje odzwierciedlenie na ogół w relatywnie niższym poziomie wydajności produkcji oraz wyników produkcyjnych i ekonomicznych. W przypadku warzyw z upraw ekologicznych występuje duże zróżnicowanie w ich plonowaniu w porównaniu do upraw konwencjonalnych. Możliwe jest uzyskiwanie relatywnie większej wydajności, np. w produkcji ekologicznych ogórków, marchwi, kapusty, co świadczy o dużej roli postępu biologicznego oraz ekologicznych metod wytwarzania, w tym zwłaszcza uprawy i nawożenia gleby, w kształtowaniu wydajności produkcji roślinnej. Badania dowiodły, że osiągnięcia w hodowli roślin uprawnych oraz upowszechnianie postępu biologicznego odgrywa często dominującą rolę w uzyskiwaniu wzrostu wydajności konwencjonalnej produkcji roślinnej. W związku z tym, postęp biologiczny nabiera szczególnego znaczenia w kontekście poprawy wydajności i efektywności gospodarstw ekologicznych. Oznacza to konieczność zwiększania wysiłków na rzecz rozwoju postępu biologicznego w rolnictwie ekologicznym.

Suggested Citation

  • Komorowska, Dorota, 2024. "Organizacja i Efektywność Polskich Gospodarstw Ekologicznych w Porównaniu do Konwencjonalnych," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2024(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:348641
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.348641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/348641/files/KOMOROWSKA-4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.348641?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herda-Kopańska, Justyna & Kulawik, Jacek, 2022. "Key Problems of Using Subsidies Coupled with Agricultural Production," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 329857, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    2. Offermann, Frank & Nieberg, Hiltrud & Zander, Katrin, 2009. "Dependency of organic farms on direct payments in selected EU member states: Today and tomorrow," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 273-279, June.
    3. Wrzaszcz, Wioletta, 2022. "Development of Organic Farming and Its Environment in Poland in the Light of the European Green Deal Challenges," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2022(2).
    4. Szubska-Włodarczyk Natalia, 2023. "Organic Farming in the European Union in the Face of the Challenges of Sustainable Consumption," Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej / Problems of Agricultural Economics, Sciendo, vol. 376(3), pages 47-65, September.
    5. Kapusta, Franciszek, 2021. "Fifteen Years of Polish Agriculture in the European Union," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 319788, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    6. Herda-Kopańska Justyna & Kulawik Jacek, 2022. "Key Problems of Using Subsidies Coupled with Agricultural Production," Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej / Problems of Agricultural Economics, Sciendo, vol. 372(3), pages 21-44.
    7. de Ponti, Tomek & Rijk, Bert & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2012. "The crop yield gap between organic and conventional agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-9.
    8. Szubska-Włodarczyk Natalia, 2023. "Organic Farming in the European Union in the Face of the Challenges of Sustainable Consumption," Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej / Problems of Agricultural Economics, Sciendo, vol. 376(3), pages 47-65, September.
    9. Władysława Łuczka & Sławomir Kalinowski & Nadiia Shmygol, 2021. "Organic Farming Support Policy in a Sustainable Development Context: A Polish Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Wrzaszcz, Wioletta & Prandecki, Konrad, 2020. "Agriculture and The European Green Deal," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 311273, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    11. Komorowska, Dorota, 2011. "Wyniki Produkcyjne I Ekonomiczne Gospodarstw Ekologicznych Na Tle Konwencjonalnych," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 1(150).
    12. Herda-Kopańska Justyna & Kulawik Jacek, 2022. "Key Problems of Using Subsidies Coupled with Agricultural Production," Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej / Problems of Agricultural Economics, Sciendo, vol. 372(3), pages 21-44, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalia Brzezina & Birgit Kopainsky & Erik Mathijs, 2016. "Can Organic Farming Reduce Vulnerabilities and Enhance the Resilience of the European Food System? A Critical Assessment Using System Dynamics Structural Thinking Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-32, September.
    2. Natalia Brzezina & Katharina Biely & Ariella Helfgott & Birgit Kopainsky & Joost Vervoort & Erik Mathijs, 2017. "Development of Organic Farming in Europe at the Crossroads: Looking for the Way Forward through System Archetypes Lenses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Casolani, Nicola & Nissi, Eugenia & Giampaolo, Antonio & Liberatore, Lolita, 2021. "Evaluating the effects of European support measures for Italian organic farms," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Roma Ryś-Jurek, 2022. "Interdependence between Energy Cost and Financial Situation of the EU Agricultural Farms—Towards the Implementation of the Bioeconomy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Błażej Suproń & Janusz Myszczyszyn, 2024. "Impact of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption on the Production of the Agricultural Sector in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Anglade, J. & Billen, G. & Garnier, J. & Makridis, T. & Puech, T. & Tittel, C., 2015. "Nitrogen soil surface balance of organic vs conventional cash crop farming in the Seine watershed," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 82-92.
    7. Breustedt, Gunnar & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe & Tiedemann, Torben, 2011. "Organic or conventional? Optimal dairy farming technology under the EU milk quota system and organic subsidies," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 223-229, April.
    8. Magdalena Maciaszczyk & Artur Kwasek & Maria Kocot & Damian Kocot, 2022. "Determinants of Purchase Behavior of Young E-Consumers of Eco-Friendly Products to Further Sustainable Consumption Based on Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Guy Meunier, 2020. "Land-sparing vs land-sharing with incomplete policies [Rethinking the causes of deforestation: lessons from economic models]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(2), pages 438-466.
    10. Rainer Maurer, 2022. "Ist ökologischer oder konventioneller Landbau besser für die Biodiversität? [Is Organic or Conventional Farming Better for Biodiversity?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 102(4), pages 303-309, April.
    11. Blasi, E. & Passeri, N. & Franco, S. & Galli, A., 2016. "An ecological footprint approach to environmental–economic evaluation of farm results," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 76-82.
    12. Némethová Jana & Dubcová Alena & Nagyová Ľudmila & Kramáreková Hilda, 2017. "Ecological Farming in Slovakia and Its Regional Disparities," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 9(4), pages 746-768, December.
    13. Ivana Kravčáková Vozárová & Rastislav Kotulič, 2025. "Exploring the Role of EU Subsidies in Enhancing the Competitiveness of Slovak Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Atanu Mukherjee & Emmanuel C. Omondi & Paul R. Hepperly & Rita Seidel & Wade P. Heller, 2020. "Impacts of Organic and Conventional Management on the Nutritional Level of Vegetables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    15. Ivana Kravčáková Vozárová & Rastislav Kotulič, 2024. "The Impact of EU Subsidies on the Competitiveness of Slovak Farms from the Perspective of Legal Form," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
    16. Gönül Sevinç & Mustafa Hakkı Aydoğdu & Mehmet Cançelik & Mehmet Reşit Sevinç, 2019. "Farmers’ Attitudes toward Public Support Policy for Sustainable Agriculture in GAP-Şanlıurfa, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Watkins, K. Bradley & Mane, Ranjitsinh U. & McClung, Anna, 2018. "Economic Risk Analysis of Rice Cultivars under Organic and Conventional Management," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266587, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    18. Lakner, Sebastian & Breustedt, Gunnar, 2015. "Efficiency analysis of organic farming systems- a review of methods, topics, results, and conclusions," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212025, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Beadle, Brian, 2023. "The design and application of an agricultural sustainability index using item response theory," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 278112.
    20. Joseph, Sarah & Peters, Irene & Friedrich, Hanno, 2019. "Can Regional Organic Agriculture Feed the Regional Community? A Case Study for Hamburg and North Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:348641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seriaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.