Forests and Hydrological Services: Reconciling public and science perceptions
This paper compares and contrasts the science and public perceptions of the role of forests in relation to water quantity (annual and seasonal runoff and recharge) and erosion. It is suggested that the disparity between the two perceptions needs to be addressed before we are in a position to devise and develop financing mechanisms for the conservation and protection of indigenous forests. Examples are given of three â€˜interactiveâ€™ forest hydrology research programmes: in the UK, South Africa and Panama. Through the involvement of stakeholder groups, often with representatives comprising both the science and public perceptions, interactive research programmes were designed not only to derive new research findings but also to achieve better â€˜ownershipâ€™ and acceptance of research findings by the stakeholders. Following this approach, a new programme of research is outlined, aimed at improving our knowledge of forest impacts on seasonal flows and which represents DFIDâ€™s contribution to the UN Year of Mountains, 2002. It is concluded that to move towards a reconciliation of the different perceptions and to connect policy with science will require further research to understand how the â€˜beliefâ€™ systems underlying the science and public perceptions have evolved, and better dissemination of research findings.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Bruijnzeel, L.A., 2001. "Hydrology of tropical montane cloud forests: A Reassessment," Land Use and Water Resources Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Centre for Land Use and Water Resources Research, vol. 1.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:luawrr:47860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.