IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joafsc/369205.html

Resilience strategies for centers and institutes focused on food systems transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Gwin, Lauren
  • Miller, Michelle
  • Lowe, Erin
  • Hoy, Casey
  • Creamer, Nancy
  • Cohen, Nevin
  • Pirog, Rich
  • Kelly, Tom
  • Tomich, Thomas

Abstract

University-based centers and institutes can play an important role in facilitating community-based, inter- and transdisciplinary research, and providing the capacity and expertise to address pressing issues. However, many centers and institutes face challenges related to long-term stability and resili­ence. In this paper we share recommendations on how to support centers and institutes that focus on food systems transformation. We drew these rec­ommendations from insights and stories shared by leaders of nine diverse centers and institutes that participate in the Inter-Institutional Network for Food, Agriculture, and Sustainability (INFAS). We discuss how they are structured, the work they have done, and the benefits of that work, as well as the challenges they have faced and what they rec­ommend for addressing those challenges. Their primary challenges include cultivating the support of university administrators and faculty, hiring and retaining supportive faculty, and securing sustaina­ble funding. We provide a diverse range of recom­mendations to address each of these challenges, with the hope that other centers and institutes can find some that will be relevant to their particular institutional, social, and political contexts. Note: Lauren Gwin, Michelle Miller, and Erin B. Lowe are co–first authors

Suggested Citation

  • Gwin, Lauren & Miller, Michelle & Lowe, Erin & Hoy, Casey & Creamer, Nancy & Cohen, Nevin & Pirog, Rich & Kelly, Tom & Tomich, Thomas, 2024. "Resilience strategies for centers and institutes focused on food systems transformation," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 13(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:369205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/369205/files/1272.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leahey, Erin & Barringer, Sondra N., 2020. "Universities’ commitment to interdisciplinary research: To what end?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(2).
    2. Marcia Ostrom, 2020. "Radical roots and twenty-first century realities: rediscovering the egalitarian aspirations of Land Grant University Extension," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(4), pages 935-943, December.
    3. Sondra N. Barringer & Erin Leahey & Karina Salazar, 2020. "What Catalyzes Research Universities to Commit to Interdisciplinary Research?," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(6), pages 679-705, September.
    4. Wendy Mendes & Jacqui Gingras & Pamela Robinson & Janice Waddell, 2014. "Community-university research partnerships: a role for university research centers?," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 165-179, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharma, Anuj & Nunkoo, Robin & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2021. "On the intellectual structure and influence of tourism social science research," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Andrew S. Hanks & Kevin M. Kniffin & Xuechao Qian & Bo Wang & Bruce A. Weinberg, 2022. "First Foot Forward: A Two-Step Econometric Method for Parsing and Estimating the Impacts of Multiple Identities," NBER Working Papers 30293, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Dong Joon Park, 2025. "Do epistemic similarity and experiential familiarity enhance the productivity of early-career interdisciplinary researchers?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 2829-2859, May.
    4. Fontana, Magda & Iori, Martina & Leone Sciabolazza, Valerio & Souza, Daniel, 2022. "The interdisciplinarity dilemma: Public versus private interests," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(7).
    5. Joshua Newman, 2025. "Cultural barriers to interdisciplinary research collaboration: evidence from Australia," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Amarendra Sharma, 2025. "Academic Research Output Derivatives: Structuring Futures and Options on Research Output Index," Papers 2505.20492, arXiv.org.
    7. Declan Fahie & Gerry Dunne, 2021. "Standing by or Standing Up? —How Philosophy Can (In)form Our Understanding of Bystander Behaviours in Workplace Bullying Dynamics," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, March.
    8. Bing Xia & Kelei Wu & Peikun Guo & Yuan Sun & Jindong Wu & Jie Xu & Shifu Wang, 2022. "Multidisciplinary Innovation Adaptability of Campus Spatial Organization: From a Network Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    9. Arnold, Austin & Cafer, Anne & Green, John & Haines, Seena & Mann, Georgianna & Rosenthal, Meagen, 2021. "“Perspective: Promoting and fostering multidisciplinary research in universities”," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    10. Bethany K Laursen & Nicole Motzer & Kelly J Anderson, 2022. "Pathways for assessing interdisciplinarity: A systematic review," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 326-343.
    11. William Lacy, 2023. "Local food systems, citizen and public science, empowered communities, and democracy: hopes deserving to live," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(1), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Kevin M. Kniffin & Andrew S. Hanks & Xuechao Qian & Bo Wang & Bruce A. Weinberg, 2020. "Dissertators with Distantly Related Foci Face Divergent Near-Term Outcomes," NBER Working Papers 27825, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Badiee, Aghdas & Moshtari, Mohammad & Berenguer, Gemma, 2024. "A systematic review of operations research and management science modeling techniques in the study of higher education institutions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    14. Filippo Dal Fiore, 2025. "Can We Reinvent the Modern University? A Vision for a Complementary Academic System, with a Life-Affirming and Spiritually Conscious Orientation," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    15. Nicholas Copeland, 2022. "Liberation extension: building capacities for civilizational transition," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 859-870, September.
    16. Claudia Maria López & R. Varisa Patraporn & Kelliana Lim & Kylee Khan, 2022. "Walking to Build a Critical Community-Engaged Project: Collaborative Observations of Neighborhood Change in Long Beach, California," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:369205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.