IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijofsd/346641.html

A Delphi Study on Blockchain Application to Food Traceability

Author

Listed:
  • Aldrighetti, Anna
  • Canavari, Maurizio
  • Hingley, Martin K.

Abstract

Blockchain has been described as a breakthrough Information and Communication Technology having the potential to ensure safe, immutable and transparent information exchange between actors. This study attempts to foresee whether Blockchain will play an important role in traceability management and how this innovation is expected to change the agri-food sector's future, using a Delphi group discussion with experts. According to our results, blockchain is potentially recognised as a decentralised system able not only to harmonise safety and quality standards but also to reduce bureaucracy. Greater efficiency and reliability of the system would lead to the establishment and coordination of new supply chain relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Aldrighetti, Anna & Canavari, Maurizio & Hingley, Martin K., 2021. "A Delphi Study on Blockchain Application to Food Traceability," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 12(01), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:346641
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.346641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/346641/files/A%20DELPHI%20STUDY%20ON%20BLOCKCHAIN%20APPLICATION.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.346641?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenny Yuezhen Su & Maurizio Canavari, 2018. "Delphi study on country-of-origin labelling for processed foods," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Cho, Sanggoo & Choi, Gyunghyun, 2019. "Exploring Latent Factors Influencing the Adoption of a Processed Food Traceability System in South Korea," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 10(02), January.
    3. Michael E. Porter & Mark R. Kramer, 2019. "Creating Shared Value," Springer Books, in: Gilbert G. Lenssen & N. Craig Smith (ed.), Managing Sustainable Business, chapter 16, pages 323-346, Springer.
    4. J. Leon Zhao & Shaokun Fan & Jiaqi Yan, 2016. "Overview of business innovations and research opportunities in blockchain and introduction to the special issue," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-7, December.
    5. Davidson, Sinclair & De Filippi, Primavera & Potts, Jason, 2018. "Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 639-658, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Priyanka Vern & Anupama Panghal & Rahul S Mor & Sachin S. Kamble & Md. Shamimul Islam & Syed Abdul Rehman Khan, 2023. "Influential barriers to blockchain technology implementation in agri-food supply chain," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1206-1219, September.
    2. Priyanka Vern & Anupama Panghal & Rahul S Mor & Sachin S. Kamble, 2025. "Blockchain technology in the agri-food supply chain: a systematic literature review of opportunities and challenges," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 643-675, February.
    3. Giovanna Sacchi & Lavinia Romanello & Maurizio Canavari, 2024. "The future of organic certification: potential impacts of the inclusion of Participatory Guarantee Systems in the European organic regulation," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Weber, Rolf & Braun, Jürgen & Frank, Markus, 2022. "How does the Adoption of Digital Technologies Affect the Social Sustainability of Small-scale Agriculture in South-West Germany?," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 13(03), September.
    5. Rosa, Rui & Nogueira, Mafalda & Azinheira, Filipa, 2022. "Spirituality, Socialization and Knowledge: a Philosophical Approach to the Slow Food Agri-food System," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 13(04), December.
    6. Syaiful Anwar & Tomy Perdana & Meddy Rachmadi & Trisna Insan Noor, 2022. "Traceability Information Model for Sustainability of Black Soybean Supply Chain: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, August.
    7. repec:ags:ijaeri:334605 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Yao, JingJing & Ota, Takahiro, 2024. "A new interpretation of the AISAS model: An empirical analysis of Chinese consumers’ perceptions of the food traceability system for aquatic and edible bird’s nest products," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 15(02), June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nick Cowen, 2019. "Markets for rules: the promise and peril of blockchain distributed governance," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(2), pages 213-226, September.
    2. Dulani Jayasuriya Daluwathumullagamage & Alexandra Sims, 2021. "Fantastic Beasts: Blockchain Based Banking," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-43, April.
    3. Yuk Ming Tang & Ka Yin Chau, 2025. "Blockchain evolution and management theoretical (BEMT) model based on integrated semantic similarity and co-citation analysis for next generation service industry," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 475-494, June.
    4. Schmück, Kilian & Schückes, Magnus & Gutmann, Tobias & Gassmann, Oliver, 2025. "Less trust, more truth: Implications and design choices for business models and platform ecosystems in the age of Web3," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    5. Khalid Ahmed Al-Ansari & Ahmet Faruk Aysan, 2021. "More than ten years of Blockchain creation: How did we use the technology and which direction is the research heading? [Plus de dix ans de création Blockchain : Comment avons-nous utilisé la technologie et dans quelle direction se dirige la recher," Working Papers hal-03343048, HAL.
    6. Libin Guo & Xiangtian Guo, 2022. "A Blockchain Technology Introduction Strategy for Asymmetric Sharing Platforms under Different Homing Behaviors of Both Sides," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Witold Nowiński & Miklós Kozma, 2017. "How Can Blockchain Technology Disrupt the Existing Business Models?," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 5(3), pages 173-188.
    8. Su, Dan & Zhang, Lijun & Peng, Hua & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee, 2023. "Technical challenges of blockchain technology for sustainable manufacturing paradigm in Industry 4.0 era using a fuzzy decision support system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Fortin, Mélissa & Pimentel, Erica, 2024. "Bitcoin: An accounting regime," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Anh Viet Tran & Bui Thanh Khoa, 2025. "Systematic Review of Blockchain Business Applications and the Metaverse," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    11. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    12. Md Qamruzzaman & Abdulrahman Alomair & Abdulaziz S. Al Naim & Ramisa Rutbata Hossain, 2026. "ESG-based sustainability uncertainty and green growth in the US and UK: do human capital and technology matter?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 6185-6222, April.
    13. Kyungmoo Heo & Sangyoon Yi, 2023. "(De)centralization in the governance of blockchain systems: cryptocurrency cases," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(3), pages 59-82, September.
    14. Tanković Ana Čuić & Prodan Marina Perišić & Benazić Dragan, 2023. "Consumer Segments in Blockchain Technology Adoption," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 18(2), pages 162-172, December.
    15. Xin Jin & Shuhao Liu & Xue Lei, 2026. "ICT investment and carbon emission efficiency in regional port groups: evidence from Chinese coastal provinces," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Yunmei Liu & Shuai Zhang & Min Chen & Yenchun Wu & Zhengxian Chen, 2021. "The Sustainable Development of Financial Topic Detection and Trend Prediction by Data Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    17. Marina Efthymiou & Katie McCarthy & Chris Markou & John F. O’Connell, 2022. "An Exploratory Research on Blockchain in Aviation: The Case of Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Enric Junqué de Fortuny & Yifei Zhang, 2023. "Exploring the New Frontier: Decentralized Financial Services," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 266-282, December.
    19. Teck Ming Tan & Saila Saraniemi, 2023. "Trust in blockchain-enabled exchanges: Future directions in blockchain marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 914-939, July.
    20. Darcy W. E. Allen & Chris Berg & Aaron M. Lane & Jason Potts, 2020. "Cryptodemocracy and its institutional possibilities," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 363-374, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:346641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/centmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.