IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ecjilt/404256.html

Rule-Makers, Rule-Takers, and Domestic Regulatory Space: Emerging Trends in AI Governance through Free Trade Agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Khorana, Sangeeta
  • Mahate, Ashraf A.

Abstract

This article analyses how artificial intelligence (AI) relevant provisions in free trade agreements (FTAs) are emerging as instruments of regulatory governance. Using trade-related databases, namely DESTA and TAPED, we examine 16 agreements involving 50 countries that contain AI-relevant rules across five domains: data privacy, cross-border data flows, open government, data sovereignty/location of computing, and domestic data infrastructure. By adapting a structure-location-commitment framework, we develop an Agreement AI Index (AAI Index) to measure the breadth and depth of these provisions over time and across countries. The findings show that coverage converges faster than legal depth. Further, provisions relating to cross-border data flows and anti-localisation are much more and often binding, unlike open government data and domestic infrastructure provisions that are weak and scattered. Results show cross-country variation in the design of such provisions. Some countries ensure inclusion through hard obligations, while others refer to such provisions through softer clauses. As a result, a small group of countries are ‘rule-makers’ and are leading the way with standard templates, unlike most countries that act as “rule-takers”. We link these patterns to debates on AI-related legalisation, deep integration, and club governance to contribute to the literature on regulation and governance under FTAs.

Suggested Citation

  • Khorana, Sangeeta & Mahate, Ashraf A., 2026. "Rule-Makers, Rule-Takers, and Domestic Regulatory Space: Emerging Trends in AI Governance through Free Trade Agreements," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 27(1), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:404256
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404256/files/Khorana-Mahate27-1lay.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberts, Huw & Babuta, Alexander & Morley, Jessica & Thomas, Christopher & Taddeo, Mariarosaria & Floridi, Luciano, 2023. "Artificial intelligence regulation in the United Kingdom: A path to good governance and global leadership?," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 12(2), pages 1-31.
    2. Mira Burri & Kholofelo Kugler, 2024. "Regulatory autonomy in digital trade agreements," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 397-423.
    3. Caroline Freund, 2010. "Third‐country Effects of Regional Trade Agreements," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(11), pages 1589-1605, November.
    4. Susan Ariel Aaronson & Patrick Leblond, 2018. "Another Digital Divide: The Rise of Data Realms and its Implications for the WTO," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 245-272.
    5. Caroline Freund & Emanuel Ornelas, 2010. "Regional Trade Agreements," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 139-166, September.
    6. Janos Ferencz & Javier López González & Irene Oliván García, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence and international trade: Some preliminary implications," OECD Trade Policy Papers 260, OECD Publishing.
    7. Baier, Scott L. & Bergstrand, Jeffrey H., 2007. "Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 72-95, March.
    8. Henry Gao, 2018. "Digital or Trade? The Contrasting Approaches of China and US to Digital Trade," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 297-321.
    9. Caroline Freund & Emanuel Ornelas, 2010. "Regional trade agreements: blessing or burden?," CentrePiece - The magazine for economic performance 313, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    10. Esmat Zaidan & Imad Antoine Ibrahim, 2024. "AI Governance in a Complex and Rapidly Changing Regulatory Landscape: A Global Perspective," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zouheir El-Sahli, 2023. "The Partial and General Equilibrium Effects of the Greater Arab Free Trade Agreement," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 185-199, March.
    2. George Deltas & Klaus Desmet & Giovanni Facchini, 2012. "Hub-and-spoke free trade areas: theory and evidence from Israel," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 45(3), pages 942-977, August.
    3. Jaime DE MELO & Yvonne TSIKATA, 2014. "Regional integration in Africa: Challenges and prospects," Working Papers P93, FERDI.
    4. Kolcava, Dennis & Nguyen, Quynh & Bernauer, Thomas, 2019. "Does trade liberalization lead to environmental burden shifting in the global economy?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 98-112.
    5. Julian Hinz, 2023. "The ties that bind: geopolitical motivations for economic integration," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 159(1), pages 51-100, February.
    6. Aaditya Mattoo & Alen Mulabdic & Michele Ruta, 2022. "Trade creation and trade diversion in deep agreements," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 1598-1637, August.
    7. Fugazza, Marco & Nicita, Alessandro, 2013. "The direct and relative effects of preferential market access," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 357-368.
    8. Hinnerk Gnutzmann & Arevik Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan, 2019. "The silent success of customs unions," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 52(1), pages 178-224, February.
    9. Cristina Constantinescu & Aaditya Mattoo & Alen Mulabdic & Michele Ruta & Aaditya Mattoo, 2018. "Global Trade Watch 2017," World Bank Publications - Reports 29785, The World Bank Group.
    10. Qayoom Khachoo & Ridwan Ah Sheikh, 2023. "Do Preferential Trade Agreements Stimulate Non-Resident Patenting? Evidence from BRICS," Working papers 341, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    11. De Soyres,Francois Michel Marie Raphael & Maire,Julien Luc Yvon & Sublet,Guillaume, 2019. "An Empirical Investigation of Trade Diversion and Global Value Chains," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9089, The World Bank.
    12. Fugazza, Marco & Nicita, Alessandro, 2011. "Measuring preferential market access," MPRA Paper 38565, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Xuepeng Liu, 2016. "Trade Agreements and Economic Growth," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 82(4), pages 1374-1401, April.
    14. Brandi, Clara & Schwab, Jakob & Berger, Axel & Morin, Jean-Frédéric, 2020. "Do environmental provisions in trade agreements make exports from developing countries greener?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    15. Yingbin Zhang & Xiang Cai & Youjin Liu & Zhengli Xu & Junmei Gao & Sohail Ahmad Javeed, 2023. "What leads to pollution burden shifting among the Belt and Road countries? Evidence from 61 B&R countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 4831-4862, June.
    16. Gabriele Spilker & Thomas Bernauer & In Song Kim & Helen Milner & Iain Osgood & Dustin Tingley, 2018. "Trade at the margin: Estimating the economic implications of preferential trade agreements," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 189-242, June.
    17. Ornelas, Emanuel & Tovar, Patricia, 2022. "Intra-bloc tariffs and preferential margins in trade agreements," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    18. Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan, Arevik & Henn, Christian, 2018. "Peeling away the layers: Impacts of durable tariff elimination," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 259-276.
    19. Michael Pfaffermayr, 2020. "Trade creation and trade diversion of economic integration agreements revisited: a constrained panel pseudo-maximum likelihood approach," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 156(4), pages 985-1024, November.
    20. Whalley, John, 2013. "Regional Agreements: A Stocktaking Based on WTO Notifications," Commissioned Papers 156228, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:404256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esteyca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.