IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/355965.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new method for assessing the marketing efficiency of agricultural marketing channels

Author

Listed:
  • Abad, Arif
  • Maaz, Mohd Abdul Muqeet
  • Shamsi, Mohd Salman

Abstract

Purpose. This study aims to introduce a new method for assessing the efficiency of agricultural marketing channels. This innovative method rectifies the deficiencies inherent in earlier methods by encircling all channel participants in evaluating marketing efficiency, thereby delivering a more detailed assessment. Methodology / approach. The present study first identified the shortcomings of the old methods based on a literature review and then attempted to propose a new method for calculating marketing efficiency by overcoming these issues. The efficiency of marketing channels is calculated based on primary data collected from two randomly selected agriculture markets in Delhi, marketing cooperative societies operating in Delhi, and their respective intermediaries, flour mills, and consumers in the channel. The study’s sample size is 179 respondents, including all the channel members. After that, a comparison is made between traditional methods and the proposed method. Results. Results of this study show that the proposed method gives a better idea of the efficiency of marketing channels than the old methods, namely the Acharya’s approach, the Shepard’s method and the input-output approach. These methods ignore the crucial role of producers, focusing on overall margins and costs. They can call a channel efficient even if producers receive minimal benefits, necessitating a revised approach. The proposed method has two parts: (1) the ratio of overall channel benefit to cost, excluding consumers, to avoid misleading results, indicating higher benefits for channel members; (2) the ratio of the net price received by farmers to the price paid by consumers, reflecting farmer earnings. By separating marketing margins and costs, the proposed method simplifies previous complexities. Using the channel benefit-to-cost ratio and the farmer’s price-to-consumer price ratio, this method offers an accurate and comprehensive assessment, addressing flaws in Acharya’s approach. Originality / scientific novelty. The proposed method is the only method that takes care of every channel member rather than just focusing on producers / farmers. This method considers factors such as the price received by farmers (gross and net), marketing margins, marketing costs, and the price paid by consumers. Unlike old methods, this method focuses on adding value per channel, not on the number of intermediaries. Practical value / implications. The proposed method facilitates an effortless comparison of marketing efficiency for all channel members, especially farmers. Its simplicity makes it a valuable tool for policymakers to formulate effective strategies for enhancing overall channel efficiency. Researchers can also use this method in efficiency-focused studies related to agriculture and its products, gaining a comprehensive understanding of agricultural marketing channels.

Suggested Citation

  • Abad, Arif & Maaz, Mohd Abdul Muqeet & Shamsi, Mohd Salman, 2024. "A new method for assessing the marketing efficiency of agricultural marketing channels," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355965
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355965/files/6_Abad_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.355965?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karray, Salma, 2013. "Periodicity of pricing and marketing efforts in a distribution channel," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 635-647.
    2. Tao Zhai & Jiabin Liu & Daqing Wang, 2023. "Optimization path of agricultural products marketing channel based on innovative industrial chain," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 3949-3977, December.
    3. Villacis, Alexis H. & Kopp, Thomas & Mishra, Ashok K., 2024. "Agricultural marketing channels and market prices: Evidence from high-value crop producers in India," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1308-1321.
    4. Levkina, Ruslana & Petrenko, Anna, 2019. "Management of innovative marketing techniques as an effective business tool," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 5(01), March.
    5. Fernández-Olmos, Marta & Ma, Wanglin & Florine, Pecheux-Livat, 2024. "Linking Spanish wine farmers to international markets: Is direct export better than indirect export in improving farm performance?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 153-163.
    6. Arida, Agustina & Masbar, Raja & Majid, M. Shabri Abd. & Indra, I., 2023. "Does vertical asymmetric price transmission exist in the rice markets?," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(01), March.
    7. Pinhas Zusman & Michael Etgar, 1981. "The Marketing Channel as an Equilibrium Set of Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 284-302, March.
    8. Nedumaran, Swamikannu & Selvaraj, Aravazhi & Nandi, Ravi & Suchiradipta, Bhattacharjee & Jyosthnaa, Padmanabhan & Bose, Disha, 2020. "Digital integration to enhance market efficiency and inclusion of smallholder farmers: a proposed model for fresh fruit and vegetable supply chain," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(3), September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karray, Salma & Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & Zaccour, Georges, 2017. "Assessing the profitability of cooperative advertising programs in competing channels," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 142-158.
    2. Jia Liu & Cuixia Li, 2023. "Dynamic Game Analysis on Cooperative Advertising Strategy in a Manufacturer-Led Supply Chain with Risk Aversion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Dridi, Dhouha & Ben Youssef, Slim, 2015. "A Game Theoretic Framework for Competing/Cooperating Retailers under price and advertising dependent demand," MPRA Paper 63317, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. L. Lambertini, 2013. "Coordinating Static and Dynamic Supply Chains with Advertising through Two-Part Tariffs," Working Papers wp874, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    5. Zhang, Peng & He, Yong & Shi, Chunming (Victor), 2017. "Retailer's channel structure choice: Online channel, offline channel, or dual channels?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 37-50.
    6. Timothy W. McGuire & Richard Staelin, 2008. "An Industry Equilibrium Analysis of Downstream Vertical Integration," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 115-130, 01-02.
    7. Xu, Xiaoping & He, Ping & Zhou, Li & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "Coordination of a platform-based supply chain in the marketplace or reselling mode considering cross-channel effect and blockchain technology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 170-187.
    8. Soroush Safarzadeh, 2023. "A game theoretic approach for pricing and advertising of an integrated product family in a duopoly," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Stephen Kelly & Daniel Chicksand, 2024. "A Critical Exploration of Bargaining in Purchasing and Supply Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 617-646, June.
    10. Raul Serrano & Juan Ramón Ferrer & Silvia Abella & Vicente Pinilla, 2024. "Market entry strategy and export destination in the Spanish wine industry," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(12), pages 621-632.
    11. Minakshi Trivedi, 1998. "Distribution Channels: An Extension of Exclusive Retailership," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(7), pages 896-909, July.
    12. Matsui, Kenji, 2019. "A supply chain member should set its margin later if another member's cost is highly uncertain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 127-138.
    13. J. He & K. S. Chin & J. B. Yang & D. L. Zhu, 2006. "Return Policy Model of Supply Chain Management for Single-Period Products," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 293-308, May.
    14. Sabina Riboldazzi, 2005. "Global Retailers and Competitive Customer Value," Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, Niccolò Cusano University, issue 2 Over-Su.
    15. Sara Balestri, 2024. "Revitalising smallholder agriculture: the impact of technical training in rural Lebanon," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 41(2), pages 361-393, July.
    16. Yan, Yingchen & Zhao, Qiuhong & Qin, Zhongfeng & Sun, Gaoji, 2022. "Integration of development and advertising strategies for multi-attribute products under competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 490-503.
    17. De Giovanni, Pietro & Karray, Salma & Martín-Herrán, Guiomar, 2019. "Vendor Management Inventory with consignment contracts and the benefits of cooperative advertising," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 465-480.
    18. Karray, Salma, 2015. "Cooperative promotions in the distribution channel," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 49-58.
    19. Shuang Ma & Linda L. Zhang, 2024. "Optimizing joint operations decision-making involving substitute products: a Stackelberg game model and nested PSO," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 343(1), pages 373-399, December.
    20. Salma Karray & Chirag Surti, 2016. "Channel coordination with quantity discounts and/or cooperative advertising," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(17), pages 5317-5335, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.