IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajosrd/198310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sea Cucumber Fishery and Trade in Sta. Cruz, Davao Del Sur, Philippines: Supply Chains and Cost-Benefit Analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Shuck, Vlademir A.
  • Mondoyo, Rod Norbert D.
  • Acuňa, Thaddeus R.
  • Gamboa, Ruth U.

Abstract

In the country, sea cucumbers are exploited almost exclusively for export. It is harvested in three ways; commercial fishing, artisanal fishing and gleaning. These methods provide disproportionate economic benefits to these players in the supply chain. In this study, sea ranching, a new culture system for sea cucumber was analyzed in terms of its economic and commercial viability. Under the sea ranching system Holothuriascabra(sandfish) is the species being raised mainly due to its high economic value. Under the traditional method, labor comprises the largest share in the total cost, while the cost of juvenile and labor (monitoring cost) accounts to almost 87% in the sea ranching system. Based on the results of the study, selling dried sandfish would gain positive net profit, while selling wet sandfish will incur a net loss. A significant difference in income was also observed between fishers who rely on traditional method and those who will adopt the new system. Sea ranching system is a very promising method that is expected to be beneficial both to the community and the environment. However, high capital requirement, uninformed community and the lack of support from the government and concerned agencies remains to be a big challenge.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuck, Vlademir A. & Mondoyo, Rod Norbert D. & Acuňa, Thaddeus R. & Gamboa, Ruth U., 2013. "Sea Cucumber Fishery and Trade in Sta. Cruz, Davao Del Sur, Philippines: Supply Chains and Cost-Benefit Analyses," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 3(11), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajosrd:198310
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.198310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/198310/files/7-340-3_11_2013-AJARD-836-850.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.198310?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beamon, Benita M., 1998. "Supply chain design and analysis:: Models and methods," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 281-294, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hejn Nielsen, Erland, 2013. "Small sample uncertainty aspects in relation to bullwhip effect measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 543-549.
    2. Nagesh Shukla & Senevi Kiridena, 2016. "A fuzzy rough sets-based multi-agent analytics framework for dynamic supply chain configuration," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(23), pages 6984-6996, December.
    3. Mula, Josefa & Peidro, David & Díaz-Madroñero, Manuel & Vicens, Eduardo, 2010. "Mathematical programming models for supply chain production and transport planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 377-390, August.
    4. Idris, Nurjihan & Arshad, Fatimah Mohamed & Radam, Alias & Ali, Noor Azman, 2009. "Construct validation of supply chain management in cooperative," MPRA Paper 19483, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Zhao, Nanyang & Hong, Jiangtao & Lau, Kwok Hung, 2023. "Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    6. Ogulin, R. & Selen, W. & Ashayeri, J., 2010. "Determinants of Informal Coordination in Networked Supply Chains," Discussion Paper 2010-133, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    7. Watanabe, Chihiro & Naveed, Nasir & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2018. "Digital solutions transform the forest-based bioeconomy into a digital platform industry - A suggestion for a disruptive business model in the digital economy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 168-188.
    8. Tang, Christopher S. & Davarzani, Hoda & Sarkis, Joseph, 2015. "Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A reviewAuthor-Name: Fahimnia, Behnam," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 1-15.
    9. Rich, Karl M. & Ross, R. Brent & Baker, A. Derek & Negassa, Asfaw, 2011. "Quantifying value chain analysis in the context of livestock systems in developing countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 214-222, April.
    10. Ahmad Zia Wahdat & Jayson L. Lusk, 2023. "The Achilles heel of the U.S. food industries: Exposure to labor and upstream industries in the supply chain," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(2), pages 624-643, March.
    11. Sajjad Aslani Khiavi & Hamid Khaloozadeh & Fahimeh Soltanian, 2021. "Suboptimal sliding manifold For nonlinear supply chain with time delay," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 151-173, July.
    12. García Cáceres, Rafael Guillermo & Aráoz Durand, Julián Arturo & Gómez, Fernando Palacios, 2009. "Integral analysis method - IAM," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 891-903, February.
    13. Amol Adkonkar & Anand Sharma & Pooja Arora, 2024. "Validation of Instrument Measuring the Impact of SCM Practices and SCM Agility on Competitive Advantage and Organization Performance in Indian Pharmaceutical Firms," Paradigm, , vol. 28(1), pages 65-83, June.
    14. Peter C. Bell & Jing Chen, 2017. "Close integration of pricing and supply chain decisions has strategic as well as operations level benefits," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 77-93, October.
    15. repec:tkp:ijsrsy:v:2:y:2012:i:2:p:73-91 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Monideepa Tarafdar & Sufian Qrunfleh, 2017. "Agile supply chain strategy and supply chain performance: complementary roles of supply chain practices and information systems capability for agility," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 925-938, February.
    17. Deepak Bhagat & U.R. Dhar, 2014. "Relationship Dynamics in the Pineapple Supply Chain: Empirical Evidence from the Garo Hills of Meghalaya," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(4), pages 747-765, December.
    18. Morteza Lalmazloumian & Kuan Yew Wong & Kannan Govindan & Devika Kannan, 2016. "A robust optimization model for agile and build-to-order supply chain planning under uncertainties," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(2), pages 435-470, May.
    19. Qiang, Patrick & Nagurney, Anna, 2012. "A bi-criteria indicator to assess supply chain network performance for critical needs under capacity and demand disruptions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 801-812.
    20. Belieres, Simon & Hewitt, Mike & Jozefowiez, Nicolas & Semet, Frédéric, 2022. "Meta partial benders decomposition for the logistics service network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 473-489.
    21. Holzapfel, Andreas & Potoczki, Tobias & Kuhn, Heinrich, 2023. "Designing the breadth and depth of distribution networks in the retail trade," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajosrd:198310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesstea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.