IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/367894.html

Government and Non-Governmental Organisation Led Agricultural Development Projects and the Accumulation of Social and Economic Capitals in Mezam, Cameroon

Author

Listed:
  • Ngansah, Njegani
  • Azibo, Balgah Roland
  • Fonteh, Mathias Fru

Abstract

Government (GO) and Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) undertake agricultural development projects especially in Sub-Saharan Africa where agriculture-dependent livelihoods are predominant. Agricultural development has been accompanied by a theoretical debate vis-à-vis who is best placed to steer the process. Unfortunately, empirical evidence to refute or ramify the theoretical contestations are extremely limited. This article contributes to the literature by comparatively analyzing the effects of GO) and NGO–led agricultural development projects on social and economic capitals in Cameroon. Mixed methods were applied on stakeholders of four selected GO-led and four NGO-led development projects in Mezam division in the North West region of Cameroon, chosen due to its long history of having both GO and NGO-led agricultural development projects. A structured questionnaire was used to collect quantitative data from randomly selected 180 beneficiaries, including 90 from GO and 90 from NGO projects, and 120 project staff that is 15 (2 top, 5 middle and 8 lower management) per retained organization. Recall was applied to construct before-after comparisons with interviewees, in the absence of baseline information. In-depth interviews and observations were done with selected project staff and beneficiaries, respectively. Quantitative data was analyzed using SPSS version 25.0, while qualitative data was analyzed using content analysis. Results show significant increase in the growth of social and economic benefits for respondents from both GO and NGO-led projects (p < 0.05), though higher for NGO-led projects. The study concludes that agricultural development by both organizational types can enhance social and economic development. Further studies are needed to ramify these results. Comparative analyses between project staff and beneficiaries can highlight any differences in them, in terms of perceptive and actual impacts of GO and NGO-led agricultural projects on social and economic capitals. Comprehensive assessments based on all livelihood capitals are recommended to ground these contentions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ngansah, Njegani & Azibo, Balgah Roland & Fonteh, Mathias Fru, 2024. "Government and Non-Governmental Organisation Led Agricultural Development Projects and the Accumulation of Social and Economic Capitals in Mezam, Cameroon," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 42(2), pages 1-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:367894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/367894/files/Ngansah4222024AJAEES112638.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christophe Béné & Derek Headey & Lawrence Haddad & Klaus Grebmer, 2016. "Is resilience a useful concept in the context of food security and nutrition programmes? Some conceptual and practical considerations," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(1), pages 123-138, February.
    2. Bond, Richard & Hulme, David, 1999. "Process Approaches to Development: Theory and Sri Lankan Practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 1339-1358, August.
    3. Louis Henri Ngah Ntiga & Olivier Nguemjom Bouya & Tanankem Voufo Belmondo, 2023. "Fiscal policy and industrial sector production in Cameroon [Politique budgétaire et production du secteur industriel au Cameroun]," Working Papers hal-04125774, HAL.
    4. Bell, Karen & Hickel, Jason & Arbon, Rob & Zoomkawala, Huzaifa, 2023. "Which direction for sustainable development? A time series comparison of the impacts of redistributive versus market policies in Bolivia and South Korea," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125896, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Mensah, Emmanuel Joseph, 2011. "The Sustainable Livelihood Framework: A Reconstruction," MPRA Paper 46733, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Karen Bell & Jason Hickel & Rob Arbon & Huzaifa Zoomkawala, 2023. "Which direction for sustainable development? A time series comparison of the impacts of redistributive versus market policies in Bolivia and South Korea," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3408-3427, October.
    7. World Bank, 1997. "World Development Report 1997," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 5980, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joanna Kudełko, 2025. "Development sustainability levels in EU countries," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 2797-2811, April.
    2. Moreno-Dodson, Blanca & Wodon, Quentin, 2008. "Public Finance for Poverty Reduction: An Overview," MPRA Paper 11078, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Bond, Richard & Curran, Johanna & Kirkpatrick, Colin & Lee, Norman & Francis, Paul, 2001. "Integrated Impact Assessment for Sustainable Development: A Case Study Approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 1011-1024, June.
    4. Brian Smith, 2000. "The Concept of an ‘Enabling’ Local Authority," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 18(1), pages 79-94, February.
    5. Levien, Michael, 2015. "Social Capital as Obstacle to Development: Brokering Land, Norms, and Trust in Rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 77-92.
    6. Fox, Jonathan A, 1997. "The World Bank and Social Capital: Contesting the Concept in Practice," Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, Working Paper Series qt6764j1h0, Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, UC Santa Cruz.
    7. Joakim Öjendal & Anki Dellnas, 2018. "Governance Dilemmas of Sustainable Cities," Working Papers id:12490, eSocialSciences.
    8. Michael Eugene Ekpo (Ph.D) & Ofonmbuk Etido Atakpa (Ph.D) & Obio Akpa & Oruk Anam, L.G.A. & Ubong Etim Umoh (Ph.D), 2024. "Political Leadership and Economic Development in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3), pages 2574-2589, March.
    9. Akila Wijerathna-Yapa & Ranjith Pathirana, 2022. "Sustainable Agro-Food Systems for Addressing Climate Change and Food Security," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, September.
    10. Helje Kaldaru & Eve Parts, 2008. "Social and institutional factors of economic development: evidence from Europe," Baltic Journal of Economics, Baltic International Centre for Economic Policy Studies, vol. 8(1), pages 29-51, October.
    11. Tansel, Aysit, 2002. "Determinants of school attainment of boys and girls in Turkey: individual, household and community factors," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 455-470, October.
    12. Béné, Christophe & d'Hôtel, Elodie Maître & Pelloquin, Raphaël & Badaoui, Outman & Garba, Faroukou & Sankima, Jocelyne W., 2024. "Resilience – and collapse – of local food systems in conflict affected areas; reflections from Burkina Faso," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    13. Blake-Rath, Robyn & Grote, Ulrike, 2022. "Resilienz und Digitalisierung in der deutschen Agrarwirtschaft: Lehren aus der COVID-19-Pandemie," 62nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 7-9, 2022 329610, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    14. Oparina, Ekaterina & Clark, Andrew & Layard, Richard, 2026. "The Easterlin Paradox at 50," IZA Discussion Papers 18662, IZA Network @ LISER.
    15. Sarker, Md Nazirul Islam & Wu, Min & Alam, GM Monirul & Shouse, Roger C, 2020. "Livelihood resilience of riverine island dwellers in the face of natural disasters: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    16. Karoliina Rimhanen & Hanna Mäkinen & Miia Kuisma & Helena Kahiluoto, 2023. "What enhances dairy system resilience? Empirical cases in Finland and Russia," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    17. Willington Ortiz & Carmen Dienst & Julia Terrapon-Pfaff, 2012. "Introducing Modern Energy Services into Developing Countries: The Role of Local Community Socio-Economic Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Pletcher, James, 2000. "The Politics of Liberalizing Zambia's Maize Markets," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 129-142, January.
    19. Crandall, Robert W, 1998. "New Zealand Spectrum Policy: A Model for the United States?," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(2), pages 821-840, October.
    20. Changyu Ren & Weizhong Liu & Tong Xiao & Alessandra Castellini & Giulia Maesano, 2025. "The Impact of Technological Progress and Industrial Structure Upgrading on Agricultural Economic Resilience: An Empirical Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-19, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:367894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.