IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/367455.html

Does Organic Farming Ensure Food Security? An Analysis of Developing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Avinash
  • Batra, Vikas

Abstract

Food insecurity is a major challenge in front of developing countries. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United States (FAO) [1] reported that 2 billion people face moderate or severe food insecurity, of which 1.02 billion are found in Asia, 674.5 million in Africa, and 205.3 million in Latin America and the Caribbean in 2019. Inadequate food creates serious health issues among people, especially children worst affected by it. The situation further deteriorates in developing countries where poverty and population rates are high. The overconsumption of fertilizers in agriculture leads to environmental degradation and severe human illness. The unsustainability of the current agriculture model has raised many concerns about the future demand for food for an ever-growing population. The alternative method as suggested by many experts is Organic farming. The positive externalities attached to organic farming have enormous potential and it plays a very significant role in protecting the environment, providing safe food, and eventually sustainability. Further, linking the goal of food security with organic farming can help developing countries provide nutritious food and help in protecting the environment. The paper explores the situation of food insecurity worldwide and the current agriculture model performance and failure to achieve food security in many developing countries. The paper also analyses the role of organic farming to attain food security and elaborate on the limitations of organic farming to ensure food security and provides alternative models for improvement in current situations. For this purpose, study uses secondary data from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) for analysis of the food production in these two regions and reviews various research articles, FAO documents, and reports based on conventional and organic farming. The literature was accessed using Google Scholar, Institutions and Government Websites. The conventional farming put developing countries into the dilemma, to ensure food security for its population or protect environment, due to its unsustainability in long run. However, the current status of organic agriculture production is still meagre compared to conventional food production. The low yield in organic farming does not ensure the food security for the distant future but in long run organic farming can ensure the food security. The study recommended policy makers to formulate such policies which ensure sustainable food production without compromising food security in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Avinash & Batra, Vikas, 2023. "Does Organic Farming Ensure Food Security? An Analysis of Developing Countries," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 41(5), pages 1-10.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:367455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/367455/files/Avinash4192023AJAEES102178.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karthikeyan Mariappan & Deyi Zhou, 2019. "A Threat of Farmers’ Suicide and the Opportunity in Organic Farming for Sustainable Agricultural Development in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Corey Lesk & Pedram Rowhani & Navin Ramankutty, 2016. "Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7584), pages 84-87, January.
    3. Verena Seufert & Navin Ramankutty & Jonathan A. Foley, 2012. "Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7397), pages 229-232, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Liuyue & Xu, Zhenci & Wang, Sufen & Bao, Jianxia & Fan, Yunfei & Daccache, Andre, 2022. "Optimal crop planting pattern can be harmful to reach carbon neutrality: Evidence from food-energy-water-carbon nexus perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    2. J. Namwongsa & S. Boonlue & N. Riddech & S. Jogloy & W. Mongkolthanaruk, 2018. "The Survival of Endophytic Bacteria Isolated from Jerusalem Artichoke In Drought Conditions," International Journal of Applied and Physical Sciences, Dr K.Vivehananthan, vol. 4(2), pages 59-68.
    3. Choolwe Mweene & Austin Mwange, 2024. "A Framework for Effective Transitioning of The Zambia’s Food Reserve Agency from a Maize-Centric Model to a Comprehensive Strategic Grain Reserve in Zambia," African Journal of Commercial Studies, African Journal of Commercial Studies, vol. 5(4).
    4. Cheng Miao & Jing Xie & Yingdong Li, 2024. "Evaluating the risk and its acceptability of crop yield reduction in Northwest China under the impact of wind hail disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(15), pages 14027-14048, December.
    5. Dhakal, Aayush Raj & Etienne, Xiaoli L. & Trujillo-Barrera, Andres A., 2022. "Effect of Drought on Spring Wheat Prices in Northern United States," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322285, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Wang, Teng & Yi, Fujin & Liu, Huilin & Wu, Ximing & Zhong, Funing, 2021. "Can Agricultural Mechanization Have a Mitigation Effect on China's Yield Variability?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315098, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Jelili Adegboyega Adebiyi & Laura Schmitt Olabisi & Lin Liu & Dee Jordan, 2021. "Water–food–energy–climate nexus and technology productivity: a Nigerian case study of organic leafy vegetable production," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 6128-6147, April.
    8. Shima Amini & Sofia Johan & Eilnaz Kashefi-Pour & Abdulkadir Mohamed, 2025. "Climate change risk, investor sentiment, and the performance of new entrant firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 2539-2566, December.
    9. Li Jiang & Xin Chen & Fei Lun & Zhihua Pan & Jiaheng Niu & Chenyang Ding & Lijun Meng & Guoliang Zhang & Charles Peter Mgeni & Stefan Sieber & Pingli An, 2019. "Spatial Distribution and Changes of the Realizable Triple Cropping System in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Qin, Xiaoliang & Huang, Tiantian & Lu, Chen & Dang, Pengfei & Zhang, Miaomiao & Guan, Xiao-kang & Wen, Peng-fei & Wang, Tong-Chao & Chen, Yinglong & Siddique, Kadambot H.M., 2021. "Benefits and limitations of straw mulching and incorporation on maize yield, water use efficiency, and nitrogen use efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    11. Gebhardt, Beate & Hellstern, Laura, 2024. "Nachhaltigkeitsexzellenz in der Landwirtschaft: Mehr Sichtbarkeit für die versteckten Leuchttürme der Alltagspraxis," Working Papers 346815, Universitaet Hohenheim, Institute of Agricultural Policy and Agricultural Markets.
    12. Risto Conte Keivabu & Rumi Chunara, 2026. "Monsoon weather and food security in Pakistan," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 18(2), pages 361-376, April.
    13. Chatzopoulos, Thomas & Domínguez, Ignacio Pèrez & Zampieri, Matteo & Toreti, Andrea, 2017. "Extreme Weather and Global Agricultural Markets: Experimental Analysis of the Impacts of Heat Waves on Wheat Markets," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276937, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    14. Anglade, J. & Billen, G. & Garnier, J. & Makridis, T. & Puech, T. & Tittel, C., 2015. "Nitrogen soil surface balance of organic vs conventional cash crop farming in the Seine watershed," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 82-92.
    15. Imran Haider & Cuixia Li & Trinh Thi Viet Ha, 2025. "Climate Change’s Influence on Dairy Farming in Punjab, Pakistan: Effects on Milk Production, Farmers’ Views, and Future Adaptation Strategies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, May.
    16. Natalia Brzezina & Katharina Biely & Ariella Helfgott & Birgit Kopainsky & Joost Vervoort & Erik Mathijs, 2017. "Development of Organic Farming in Europe at the Crossroads: Looking for the Way Forward through System Archetypes Lenses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-23, May.
    17. Asfawi, S & Utomo, D & Isworo, S, 2023. "A comparative analysis of organic and conventional horticultural farming in the Getasan district, Semarang, Indonesia," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 23(8), August.
    18. Daniela Pacifico & Roberta Paris, 2016. "Effect of Organic Potato Farming on Human and Environmental Health and Benefits from New Plant Breeding Techniques. Is It Only a Matter of Public Acceptance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Li, Ziyue & Zhang, Zhao & Zhang, Lingyan, 2021. "Improving regional wheat drought risk assessment for insurance application by integrating scenario-driven crop model, machine learning, and satellite data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    20. Kathryn Boys & David Willis & Carlos Carpio, 2014. "Consumer willingness to pay for organic and locally grown produce on Dominica: insights into the potential for an “Organic Island”," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 595-617, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:367455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.