IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/367413.html

A Comparative Study on the Performance of Various Agricultural Crop Insurance Schemes of India with Special Reference to Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY)

Author

Listed:
  • Parthiban, J. J.
  • Anjugam, M.

Abstract

This study examined the performance of Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) crop insurance scheme in India. To evaluate the performance of the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana in comparison with previous crop insurance schemes of India, data on area insured, gross premium paid, number of farmers benefitted and number of claims paid during 2016-2021 were collected. The study employs descriptive statistics and compound annual growth rates to compare the performances of various crop insurance schemes. The determinants of the number of farmers insured under Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana were estimated through a multiple regression analysis. In comparison, PMFBY had covered a higher number of farmers thereby protecting an enormous amount of land from unforeseen risks compared to other crop insurance schemes of India. Results of the multiple regression model show that the amount of premium charged from farmers had a significant effect on the number of farmers insured over the time period. The paper also attempts to provide an overall knowledge about various crop insurance schemes of India since the implementation of crop insurance as a tool for mitigating agricultural risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Parthiban, J. J. & Anjugam, M., 2023. "A Comparative Study on the Performance of Various Agricultural Crop Insurance Schemes of India with Special Reference to Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY)," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 41(3), pages 1-8.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:367413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/367413/files/Parthiban4132023AJAEES97423.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Mahul & Charles J. Stutley, 2010. "Government Support to Agricultural Insurance : Challenges and Options for Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2432, April.
    2. Ashok Gulati & Prerna Terway & Siraj Hussain, 2018. "Crop Insurance in India: Key Issues and Way Forward," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Working Paper 352, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India.
    3. JunJie Wu, 1999. "Crop Insurance, Acreage Decisions, and Nonpoint-Source Pollution," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(2), pages 305-320.
    4. Geoffroy Enjolras & Robert Kast & Patrick Sentis, 2009. "Diversification in Area-Yield Crop Insurance : The Multi Linear Additive Model," Working Papers 09-15, LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier, revised Nov 2009.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biao Ma & Chao Peng & Le Yu, 2024. "Beyond risk management: Crop insurance premium subsidies reduce cropland abandonment in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 68(4), pages 891-911, October.
    2. Glauber, Joseph W., 2017. "Agricultural insurance and the WTO:," IFPRI book chapters, in: Bouët, Antoine; Laborde Debucquet, David (ed.), Agriculture, development, and the global trading system: 2000– 2015, chapter 10, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Cécile Aubert & Yann Raineau & Marc Raynal & Nicolas Pasquier, 2024. "Multiple agricultural risks and insurance—issues, perspectives, and illustration for wine-growing," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 105(4), pages 371-391, December.
    4. Jisang Yu & Daniel A. Sumner, 2018. "Effects of subsidized crop insurance on crop choices," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(4), pages 533-545, July.
    5. Daniel J. Clarke, 2011. "Reinsuring the Poor: Group Microinsurance Design and Costly State Verification," Economics Series Working Papers 573, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    6. Sangtaek Seo & Eduardo Segarra & Paul D. Mitchell & David J. Leatham, 2008. "Irrigation technology adoption and its implication for water conservation in the Texas High Plains: a real options approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 38(1), pages 47-55, January.
    7. Ishwor Shrestha, 2024. "Evaluating The Impact And Efficiency Of Agricultural Insurance In Nepal," Food & Agribusiness Management (FABM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 131-134, January.
    8. Petraud, Jean & Boucher, Stephen & Carter, Michael, 2015. "Competing theories of risk preferences and the demand for crop insurance: Experimental evidence from Peru," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211383, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Li, Ziyue & Zhang, Zhao & Zhang, Lingyan, 2021. "Improving regional wheat drought risk assessment for insurance application by integrating scenario-driven crop model, machine learning, and satellite data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Haibin Dong & Saheed Olaide Jimoh & Yulu Hou & Xiangyang Hou, 2020. "Willingness to Pay for Livestock Husbandry Insurance: An Empirical Analysis of Grassland Farms in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-13, September.
    11. Manganyi, Bernard & Jourdain, Damien & Karuaihe, Selma, 2024. "Preferences for index-based pasture insurance: a choice experiment in Limpopo Province, South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 63(3), April.
    12. Bergtold, Jason S. & Shanoyan, Aleksan & Fewell, Jason E. & Williams, Jeffery R., 2017. "Annual bioenergy crops for biofuels production: Farmers' contractual preferences for producing sweet sorghum," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 724-731.
    13. Lipińska Izabela, 2016. "Managing the Risk in Agriculture Production: The Role of Government," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 86-97, June.
    14. Aditya Kusuma & Bethanna Jackson & Ilan Noy, 2018. "A viable and cost-effective weather index insurance for rice in Indonesia," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 43(2), pages 186-218, September.
    15. Roger Claassen & Christian Langpap & JunJie Wu, 2017. "Impacts of Federal Crop Insurance on Land Use and Environmental Quality," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 99(3), pages 592-613, April.
    16. Ibrahima Sall & Russell Tronstad, 2021. "Simultaneous Analysis of Insurance Participation and Acreage Response from Subsidized Crop Insurance for Cotton," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Vigani, Mauro & Khafagy, Amr & Berry, Robert, 2024. "Public spending for agricultural risk management: Land use, regional welfare and intra-subsidy substitution," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    18. Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Goetz, Linde & Glauben, Thomas, 2014. "How well does the crop insurance market function in Russia?," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182856, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Ifft, Jennifer & Jodlowski, Margaret, "undated". "Federal crop insurance participation and adoption of sustainable production practices by US corn farms," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276196, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Geoffroy Enjolras & Magali Aubert, 2020. "How does crop insurance influence pesticide use? Evidence from French farms," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(4), pages 461-485, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:367413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.