IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/afjecr/362935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Credit Reference Bureaus Mitigate Commercial Banks’ Non-Performing Loans? Lesson from Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Mwakabalula, Atufigwege Jampion
  • Mwamkonko, Mussa Ally

Abstract

Creditors in Tanzania have been experiencing a problem of non-performing loans for a long time. Bank of Tanzania being the key regulator of financial sector confirmed the adoption of credit reference bureau in 2012 following the trust gained for these bureaus in addressing non-performing loans in different places around the world. The direction of this study is, therefore, to assess whether credit reference bureaus can mitigate commercial banks’ non-performing loans for the case of Tanzania. The study used panel data with in-depth information from all commercial banks in Tanzania. The results indicate that credit information pulled from credit reference bureau for credit decision is a good predictor of non-performing loans among commercial banks with a negative relationship. This suggests that information shared from credit reference bureaus have a wider possibility of reducing non-performing loans among commercial banks in Tanzania. On gauging the direct effects of information usage by commercial banks in mitigating credit risks, the study found that information about customers onboarding, screening loan applications, credit risk hedging, and loan repayment follow-ups relate negatively and significantly to non-performing loans. This outcome indicates that credit reference bureau is reliable in managing credit risks among commercial banks. Finally, the results show that bank specific factors particularly capital adequacy ratio and returns on assets significantly account for pronounced non-performing loans in Tanzania. Thus, to reduce non-performing loans Bank of Tanzania has to increase control of commercial banks in provision of credit services. Also, commercial banks have to work harmoniously with credit reference bureaus in exchanging and using credit information to reduce moral hazard and adverse selection. In addition, commercial banks must regularly evaluate their credit performance in relation to bank specific factors such as capital adequacy ratio and returns on assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Mwakabalula, Atufigwege Jampion & Mwamkonko, Mussa Ally, 2024. "Can Credit Reference Bureaus Mitigate Commercial Banks’ Non-Performing Loans? Lesson from Tanzania," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 12(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:afjecr:362935
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.362935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/362935/files/ajol-file-journals_540_articles_284383_675c0fc720ebf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.362935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shikha Goyal & Nikita Singhal & Nandita Mishra & Subhash Kumar Verma, 2023. "The impact of macroeconomic and institutional environment on NPL of developing and developed countries," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Bikker, J.A. & Metzemakers, P.A.J., 2005. "Bank provisioning behaviour and procyclicality," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 141-157, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lamperti, Francesco & Bosetti, Valentina & Roventini, Andrea & Tavoni, Massimo & Treibich, Tania, 2021. "Three green financial policies to address climate risks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. Bouvatier, Vincent & Lepetit, Laetitia, 2008. "Banks' procyclical behavior: Does provisioning matter?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 513-526, December.
    3. Harry Huizinga & Luc Laeven, 2019. "The Procyclicality of Banking: Evidence from the Euro Area," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 67(3), pages 496-527, September.
    4. Ozili, Peterson K, 2015. "Loan Loss Provisioning, Income Smoothing, Signaling, Capital Management and Procyclicality: Does IFRS Matter? Empirical Evidence from Nigeria," MPRA Paper 68350, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Ignacio Ferrero & Alejo José G. Sison, 2012. "A Survey on Virtue in Business and Management (1980-2011)," Faculty Working Papers 06/12, School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Navarra.
    6. Vighneswara Swamy, 2017. "Determinants of Bank Asset Quality and Profitability: An Empirical Assessment," Applied Economics Quarterly (formerly: Konjunkturpolitik), Duncker & Humblot GmbH, Berlin, vol. 63(1), pages 97-135.
    7. Gaffney, Edward & McCann, Fergal, 2019. "The cyclicality in SICR: mortgage modelling under IFRS 9," ESRB Working Paper Series 92, European Systemic Risk Board.
    8. Richard Simper & Maximilian J.B. Hall & Wenbin B. Liu & Valentin Zelenyuk & Zhongbao Zhou, 2014. "How Relevant is the Choice of Risk Management Control Variable to Non-parametric Bank Profit Efficiency Analysis?," CEPA Working Papers Series WP122014, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    9. Doan, Anh-Tuan & Lin, Kun-Li & Doong, Shuh-Chyi, 2020. "State-controlled banks and income smoothing. Do politics matter?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    10. repec:diw:diwwpp:dp1459 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Ebrahimi Kahou, Mahdi & Lehar, Alfred, 2017. "Macroprudential policy: A review," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 92-105.
    12. Domikowsky, Christian & Bornemann, Sven & Duellmann, Klaus & Pfingsten, Andreas, 2014. "Loan loss provisioning and procyclicality: Evidence from an expected loss model," Discussion Papers 39/2014, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    13. Abuzayed, Bana & Ben Ammar, Mouldi & Molyneux, Philip & Al-Fayoumi, Nedal, 2024. "Corruption, lending and bank performance," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 802-830.
    14. Hans Degryse & Sanja Jakovljević & Steven Ongena, 2015. "A Review of Empirical Research on the Design and Impact of Regulation in the Banking Sector," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 7(1), pages 423-443, December.
    15. Juan Amador & José Gómez-González & Andrés Pabón, 2013. "Loan growth and bank risk: new evidence," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 27(4), pages 365-379, December.
    16. Mr. Jorge A Chan-Lau, 2012. "Do Dynamic Provisions Enhance Bank Solvency and Reduce Credit Procyclicality? a Study of the Chilean Banking System," IMF Working Papers 2012/124, International Monetary Fund.
    17. Haq, Mamiza & Ongena, Steven & Pu, Juying & Tan, Eric K.M., 2024. "Do banks engage in earnings management? The role of dividends and institutional factors," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Wan-Fei Lai & Kim-Leng Goh, 2025. "Non-performing loans and bank value: The role of loan loss provisioning in US banks," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 45(3), pages 1209-1227.
    19. Jeffrey Ng & Walid Saffar & Janus Jian Zhang, 2020. "Policy uncertainty and loan loss provisions in the banking industry," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 726-777, June.
    20. Emrah Arbak, 2017. "Identifying the provisioning policies of Belgian banks," Working Paper Research 326, National Bank of Belgium.
    21. Malgorzata Olszak & Mateusz Pipien & Sylwia Roszkowska, 2016. "The Impact Of Capital Ratio On Lending Of Eu Banks – The Role Of Bank Specialization And Capitalization," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 11(1), pages 43-59, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:afjecr:362935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajer/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.