IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/afgend/361305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender and the conservation of traditional crop varieties: the case of traditional sorghum in Agago District, Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Businge, Martha
  • Odong, Thomas L.
  • Miiro, Richard

Abstract

This study examines the roles men and women play in the cultivation, processing, and marketing of traditional sorghum varieties and gendered trait preferences as they relate to the continued existence of these varieties in Agago District. The study utilized primary data which was collected through a survey and focus group discussions. The results suggest that continued production and utilization of traditional sorghum is as a result of the efforts of both men and women, although the general labor burden fell on women. There was a differential preference for the traditional sorghum characteristics of market, taste, storage, threshing, and milling by gender. Technology advancements in processing ease women’s time constraints and could result in the conservation of difficult-to-process varieties that otherwise possess good traits. Lastly, a gender dimension should be included in future strategies to understand the conservation of varieties as well as the adoption of improved sorghums.

Suggested Citation

  • Businge, Martha & Odong, Thomas L. & Miiro, Richard, . "Gender and the conservation of traditional crop varieties: the case of traditional sorghum in Agago District, Uganda," Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security (Agri-Gender), Africa Centre for Gender, Social Research and Impact Assessment, vol. 5(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:afgend:361305
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.361305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/361305/files/Miiro.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.361305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asrat, Sinafikeh & Yesuf, Mahmud & Carlsson, Fredrik & Wale, Edilegnaw, 2010. "Farmers' preferences for crop variety traits: Lessons for on-farm conservation and technology adoption," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2394-2401, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giacomo Pallante & Adam Drucker, 2014. "Niche Markets for Agrobiodiversity Conservation: Preference and Scale Heterogeneity Effects on Nepalese Consumers’ WTP for Finger Millet Products," SEEDS Working Papers 1414, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised May 2014.
    2. Oyakhilomen Oyinbo & Jordan Chamberlin & Miet Maertens, 2020. "Design of Digital Agricultural Extension Tools: Perspectives from Extension Agents in Nigeria," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 798-815, September.
    3. Aude Ridier & Caroline Roussy & Karim Chaib, 2021. "Adoption of crop diversification by specialized grain farmers in south-western France: evidence from a choice-modelling experiment," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 265-283, September.
    4. Laurent Penet & Denis Cornet & Jean-Marc Blazy & Angela Alleyne & Emilie Simone Barthe & François Bussière & Sébastien Guyader & Claudie Pavis & Dalila Pétro, 2016. "Varietal Dynamics and Yam Agro-Diversity Demonstrate Complex Trajectories Intersecting Farmers’ Strategies, Networks, and Disease Experience," Post-Print hal-01608280, HAL.
    5. Marsy Asindu & Emily Ouma & Gabriel Elepu & Diego Naziri, 2020. "Farmer Demand and Willingness-To-Pay for Sweetpotato Silage-Based Diet as Pig Feed in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Huang, Yihang & Liu, Zhengjia, 2024. "Improving Northeast China’s soybean and maize planting structure through subsidy optimization considering climate change and comparative economic benefit," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    7. N’Banan Ouattara & Xueping Xiong & Chenguang Guo & Lacina Traoré & Zié Ballo, 2022. "Econometric Analysis of the Determinants of Rice Farming Systems Choice in Côte d’Ivoire," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    8. Roussy, Caroline & Ridier, Aude & Chaib, Karim, 2014. "A methodological proposal to approach farmers’ adoption behavior: stated preferences and perceptions of the innovation," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182983, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Caroline Roussy & Aude Ridier & Karim Chaïb, 2014. "Adoption d’innovations par les agriculteurs : rôle des perceptions et des préférences," Post-Print hal-01123427, HAL.
    10. Nicholas Tyack & Milan Ščasný, 2018. "Social Valuation of Genebank Activities: Assessing Public Demand for Genetic Resource Conservation in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Carla Barlagne & Jean-Marc Blazy, 2011. "Caractérisation des systèmes de production d’igname en Guadeloupe et étude des déterminants des choix variétaux des agriculteurs," Post-Print hal-02811233, HAL.
    12. Farahbakhsh, Siavash & Peeters, Kaat & Pannecoucque, Joke & Tavernier, Greet & Vanden Berghen, Birgit & Van Meensel, Jef, 2025. "The uptake of European soy production: Insights from a participatory agent-based model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    13. Shaosheng Jin & Bashiru Mansaray & Xin Jin & Haoyang Li, 2020. "Farmers’ preferences for attributes of rice varieties in Sierra Leone," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(5), pages 1185-1197, October.
    14. Mamadou Sanogo & Roland Yonaba & Abdou Lawane & Malicki Zorom & Fonzia Tassembédo & Hamed Ali Sahad & Isidore Bazié, 2024. "Do Runoff Water Harvesting Ponds Affect Farmers Cropping Choices? Insights from Smallholders in the West African Sahel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Athukorala, Wasantha & Karunarathna, Muditha & Wilson, Clevo & Managi, Shunsuke, 2020. "Conservation of Genetic Resources of Crops: Farmer Preferences for Banana Diversity in Sri Lanka," Journal of Forest Economics, now publishers, vol. 35(2-3), pages 177-206, March.
    16. Meressa, Abrha Megos & Navrud, Stale, . "Not my cup of coffee: Farmers’ preferences for coffee variety traits – Lessons for crop breeding in the age of climate change," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(3).
    17. Astrid Mastenbroek & Irma Sirutyte & Robert Sparrow, 2021. "Information Barriers to Adoption of Agricultural Technologies: Willingness to Pay for Certified Seed of an Open Pollinated Maize Variety in Northern Uganda," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 180-201, February.
    18. Rose Nankya & Abdel Kader Naino Jika & Paola De Santis & Hannington Lwandasa & Devra Ivy Jarvis & John Wasswa Mulumba, 2022. "Community Seedbanks in Uganda: Fostering Access to Genetic Diversity and Its Conservation," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-11, June.
    19. Franklin Simtowe & Paswel Marenya & Emily Amondo & Mosisa Worku & Dil Bahadur Rahut & Olaf Erenstein, 2019. "Heterogeneous seed access and information exposure: implications for the adoption of drought-tolerant maize varieties in Uganda," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Athapaththu, Poorni & Weerahewa, Jeevika, 2024. "Willingness to Pay for Improved Planting Materials: An Application of Experimental Auction in Sri Lanka," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344265, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:afgend:361305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://agrigender.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.