IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/jetimm/v1y2023i1p17-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Stakeholder Requirements for Designing an Effective Online Research Community Platform

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen Acatrinei

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Laura Daniela RoÈ™ca (Tănase)

    (The Romanian-American University)

  • Oana-Maria Secară

    (University of Oradea - Faculty of Economic Sciences)

  • Traian Alexandru Năstase

    (iSense Solutions)

Abstract

Online research communities offer collaborative environments where organizations can interact with consumers in real-time to gain insights, build innovation projects, and access relevant audiences passionate about providing impactful responses. This research paper aims to uncover key insights from stakeholders for designing an online research community platform. To achieve this objective, the study conducted research among relevant stakeholders, including market research agencies, advertising agencies, professional associations, researchers, private marketing specialists, and future members/participants in the online community as respondents in the studies conducted. The specific objectives were to identify stakeholders' needs for tools and technical solutions to design an online research community platform, pinpoint specific needs for online communities, and identify desired functionalities regarding the online community platform. The ideal online community platform should offer various functionalities to cater to different users' needs. The platform must be user-friendly, with intuitive and easy-to-understand features for users at different experience levels. A pleasing visual design that is simple and airy with clear identification of each button/element on the page is necessary to create a perfect environment for interaction with participants. Overall, the findings from this research study provide valuable insights into stakeholders' needs for an online research community platform. By identifying these needs and desired functionalities, the study guides the development of an effective and user-friendly online research community platform that can compete with foreign platforms, bring together research agencies, interested brands/companies, and members-consumers, whose input is valuable and crucial in today's business world.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen Acatrinei & Laura Daniela RoÈ™ca (Tănase) & Oana-Maria Secară & Traian Alexandru Năstase, 2023. "Investigating Stakeholder Requirements for Designing an Effective Online Research Community Platform," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 17-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2023:i:1:p:17-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.etimm.ase.ro/RePEc/aes/jetimm/2023/ETIMM_V01_2023_77.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xie, Xuemei & Wang, Lijun & Zhang, Tao, 2023. "Involving online community customers in product innovation: The double-edged sword effect," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Elina H. Hwang & Param Vir Singh & Linda Argote, 2015. "Knowledge Sharing in Online Communities: Learning to Cross Geographic and Hierarchical Boundaries," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1593-1611, December.
    3. Chan, Kimmy Wa & Li, Stella Yiyan, 2010. "Understanding consumer-to-consumer interactions in virtual communities: The salience of reciprocity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 1033-1040, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boeker, Warren & Howard, Michael D. & Basu, Sandip & Sahaym, Arvin, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 495-507.
    2. Claudia BOBALCA, 2015. "The Loyal Customers’ Perception Regarding The Online Buying Process," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7(2), pages 241-255, August.
    3. Liuan Wang & Lu (Lucy) Yan & Tongxin Zhou & Xitong Guo & Gregory R. Heim, 2020. "Understanding Physicians’ Online-Offline Behavior Dynamics: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 537-555, June.
    4. Xiaowei Jiang & Brandon Mastromartino & Qian Yang & Jianwei Zhang & James J. Zhang, 2022. "Influence of Consumer Interaction and Community Relationships on Value Co-Creation Willingness: A Mediation Model of Chinese Sports Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Brodie, Roderick J. & Ilic, Ana & Juric, Biljana & Hollebeek, Linda, 2013. "Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 105-114.
    6. Stachowiak-Krzyżan Magda, 2021. "Involvement of Generation Z in the Communication Activities of Clothing Brands in Social Media — The Case of Poland," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 41(3), pages 115-136, September.
    7. Pollok, Patrick & Lüttgens, Dirk & Piller, Frank T., 2019. "Attracting solutions in crowdsourcing contests: The role of knowledge distance, identity disclosure, and seeker status," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 98-114.
    8. Jingchuan Pu & Yang Liu & Yuan Chen & Liangfei Qiu & Hsing Kenneth Cheng, 2022. "What Questions Are You Inclined to Answer? Effects of Hierarchy in Corporate Q&A Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 244-264, March.
    9. Lena Steinhoff & Denni Arli & Scott Weaven & Irina V. Kozlenkova, 2019. "Online relationship marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 369-393, May.
    10. Linda Argote & Sunkee Lee & Jisoo Park, 2021. "Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5399-5429, September.
    11. Mazaheri, Ebrahim & Richard, Marie-Odile & Laroche, Michel, 2011. "Online consumer behavior: Comparing Canadian and Chinese website visitors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(9), pages 958-965, September.
    12. Jiemei Zhang & Qingbo Zhu & Yupei Wang, 2019. "Social Capital on Consumer Knowledge-Sharing in Virtual Brand Communities: The Mediating Effect of Pan-Family Consciousness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Marie Madeleine Meurer & Matthias Waldkirch & Peter Kalum Schou & Eliane Léontine Bucher & Katrin Burmeister-Lamp, 2022. "Digital affordances: how entrepreneurs access support in online communities during the COVID-19 pandemic," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 637-663, February.
    14. Kharouf, Husni & Biscaia, Rui & Garcia-Perez, Alexeis & Hickman, Ellie, 2020. "Understanding online event experience: The importance of communication, engagement and interaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 735-746.
    15. Hung, Shiu-Wan & Cheng, Min-Jhih & Hou, Chen-En & Chen, Nai-Rong, 2021. "Inclusion in global virtual teams: Exploring non-spatial proximity and knowledge sharing on innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 599-610.
    16. Eduardo Antonio Chang-Muñoz & Andrés Felipe Guarín-García & Yuneidis Charris-Sevilla & José Fernando Gallego-Nicholls & Cristina Santos-Rojo & Arturo Ortigosa-Blanch, 2023. "Innovation Activities and Their Impact on Product Innovation Results: Evidence from a Sectorial Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Liao, Junyun & Pang, Jiecong & Dong, Xuebing, 2023. "More gain, more give? The impact of brand community value on users’ value co-creation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Bohdan Jung, 2017. "The Debate over the Concept of Sharing Economy and Its Role in the Digital Economy," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 44, pages 149-162.
    19. Yuan Jin & Ho Cheung Brian Lee & Sulin Ba & Jan Stallaert, 2021. "Winning by Learning? Effect of Knowledge Sharing in Crowdsourcing Contests," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 836-859, September.
    20. Yanli Zhang & Xinmiao Li & Weiguo Fan, 2020. "User adoption of physician's replies in an online health community: An empirical study," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(10), pages 1179-1191, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    online research community platform; qualitative research; stakeholder insights; marketing; virtual communities.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2023:i:1:p:17-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.