IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/jetimm/v1y2018i1p24-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Purchasing Decisions and Consumer Behavior in BoP- Albanian Reality

Author

Listed:
  • Irma SHYLE

    (Polytechnic University of Tirana)

Abstract

Poverty is a rather complex phenomenon combining several dimensions. One of the best approaches to define poverty is perhaps just to ask ordinary people how they would define it and list what features they perceive as most important. Many studies have been made about customer behavior, but few have dealt with the bottom of the pyramid. The World Bank defines extreme poverty is living on less than $1.90 per day, whereas poverty is defined as living $2–$5.5 per day. According to data from the World Bank over 2016 published in its recent Migration and Mobility report, 5.8% of the Albanian population lives in extreme poverty, while 34% live in poverty. About 25% of Albanians are living with less than US$ 2 per day. On a daily basis, the poorest people (representing 5% of the total population) struggle to eat adequately. More than half the population also lives in rural areas, where the poverty rate is 66% higher than in the capital – Tirana. Such a situation is partly explained by the lack of non-farm job opportunities. To cut the effects of poverty, the state provides economic aid to this category of people. The full amount of family economic assistance, regardless of its composition, can not be higher than 8,000 lek or US $ 65 per month. In our study, we focused only on one city of Albania (Permet). From the data of the institution dealing with the registration of the poor and the distribution of economic aid, 244 families received economic assistance at this institution. 45 questionnaires were conducted, out of which 40 were valid and were further studied to get a descriptive approach about the behaviors and habits of these consumers. The questionnaire consists on 21 closed questions, mainly about purchasing decisions and habits using Likert’s scale (5 scales) according to which: 1-not important to 5-extremely important. Data analyses point out the main factors affecting purchasing decisions for BOP customers, such as: the place where they usually buy the products, the frequency of purchase and the most purchased type of food. Most BOP consumers do not adapt to the new products, they do not want to read the instructions on the packaging or reluctant to try new products because they underestimate yourself. Respondents give priority to the senses of touch, sight and wind in purchasing food products and, unlike other consumers do not focus on packaging and product advertising, but want to have on hand and see the product. The main criteria for buying a food product for these customers are the quality and the price. This means that the survival consumers seeking affordable products but are not willing to sacrifice quality. Respondents do not feel a bond or strong brand loyalty. It is assumed that the poor can not afford being loyal to the brands but they just want to satisfy their basic food needs and tend to give priority to price and quality. So the brand's impact is not important in choosing food products for survival customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Irma SHYLE, 2018. "Purchasing Decisions and Consumer Behavior in BoP- Albanian Reality," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 24-33, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2018:i:1:p:24-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.etimm.ase.ro/RePEc/aes/jetimm/2018/ETIMM_V01_2018_47.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manfred Kirchgeorg & Monika I. Winn, 2006. "Sustainability marketing for the poorest of the poor," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 171-184, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monika Winn & Manfred Kirchgeorg & Andrew Griffiths & Martina K. Linnenluecke & Elmar Günther, 2011. "Impacts from climate change on organizations: a conceptual foundation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 157-173, March.
    2. Jielin Jing & Jianling Wang & Zhuochen Hu, 2023. "Has corporate involvement in government-initiated corporate social responsibility activities increased corporate value?—Evidence from China’s Targeted Poverty Alleviation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Gabriel, Cle-Anne, 2016. "What is challenging renewable energy entrepreneurs in developing countries?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 362-371.
    4. Cosette M. Joyner Armstrong & Kim Y. Hiller Connell & Chunmin Lang & Mary Ruppert-Stroescu & Melody L. A. LeHew, 2016. "Educating for Sustainable Fashion: Using Clothing Acquisition Abstinence to Explore Sustainable Consumption and Life Beyond Growth," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 417-439, December.
    5. Engelseth, Per & Sandvik, Marius, 2017. "On Complexity, Ecosystems, and Sustainability in Local Food Supply: A Case Study on Fresh Seafood Supply," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 8(3), August.
    6. Islam, Md. Monirul & Irfan, Muhammad & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2022. "Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in Bangladesh: The relative influencing profiles of economic factors, urbanization, physical infrastructure and institutional quality," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1130-1149.
    7. Thilo J. Ketschau, 2015. "Social Justice as a Link between Sustainability and Educational Sciences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Li, Wen & Peng, Qing, 2023. "Digital courts and corporate investment in sustainability: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Gabriel, Cle-Anne & Kirkwood, Jodyanne, 2016. "Business models for model businesses: Lessons from renewable energy entrepreneurs in developing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 336-349.
    10. Christian Schrader & Juergen Freimann & Stefan Seuring, 2012. "Business Strategy at the Base of the Pyramid," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(5), pages 281-298, July.
    11. Kumar, Avinash & Kumra, Rajeev & Singh, Ramendra, 2022. "Base of the pyramid producers’ constraints: An integrated review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 115-129.
    12. Chikweche, Tendai & Fletcher, Richard, 2010. "Understanding factors that influence purchases in subsistence markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 643-650, June.
    13. Anton Shevchenko & Xiaodan Pan & Goran Calic, 2020. "Exploring the effect of environmental orientation on financial decisions of businesses at the bottom of the pyramid: Evidence from the microlending context," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1876-1886, July.
    14. Magdalena Kowalska, 2020. "SME Managers’ Perceptions of Sustainable Marketing Mix in Different Socioeconomic Conditions—A Comparative Analysis of Sri Lanka and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Virgilio Panapanaan & Tytti Bruce & Terhi Virkki‐Hatakka & Lassi Linnanen, 2016. "Analysis of Shared and Sustainable Value Creation of Companies Providing Energy Solutions at the Base of the Pyramid (BoP)," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(5), pages 293-309, July.
    16. Tassilo Schuster & Dirk Holtbrügge, 2014. "Benefits of Cross‐sector Partnerships in Markets at the Base of the Pyramid," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 188-203, March.
    17. Hall, Jeremy K. & Daneke, Gregory A. & Lenox, Michael J., 2010. "Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 439-448, September.
    18. Joanne Meehan & David Bryde, 2011. "Sustainable procurement practice," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 94-106, February.
    19. Vinod Kumar & Zillur Rahman & A.A. Kazmi, 2013. "Sustainability Marketing Strategy: An Analysis of Recent Literature," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 14(4), pages 601-625, December.
    20. Stefan Gold & Ilma Nur Chowdhury & Fahian Anisul Huq & Kristin Heinemann, 2020. "Social business collaboration at the bottom of the pyramid: The case of orchestration," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 262-275, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    BoP; consumer behavior; marketing mix; Albanian consumers.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2018:i:1:p:24-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.