IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v27y2025is19p1256.html

AI vs. Human-Written Email Marketing: Consumer Insights for Sustainable Communication

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen Acatrinei

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Claudia Maria Miu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

In the context of the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence in digital marketing, practitioners face uncertainties regarding the actual effectiveness of content generated with the help of AI compared to that written by humans. This study offers a systematic comparison between email marketing campaigns created using AI (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini) and those written by humans, employing an experimental design involving 364 Romanian members of Generation Z (ages 19-25). Each participant evaluated four types of content across twelve efficiency dimensions in a two-phase protocol that enabled the measurement of attitudes both before and after the disclosure of the message source. The results demonstrate the statistical superiority of messages generated with the help of AI across all evaluated dimensions, with distinct specialisations among the models: Claude excels in relationship-building dimensions (naturalness, professionalism), Gemini outperforms in conversion indicators (persuasiveness, completeness), while ChatGPT optimises communication clarity (message clarity, conciseness). The strategic disclosure of the AI source significantly increased consumer acceptance, empirically validating the theory of quality surprise: participants who perceived the quality of AI as exceeding their initial expectations showed significant improvements in attitudes toward automated communication. Theoretically, the study contributes by validating the theory of quality surprise in the context of AI-assisted communication, and practically, by developing an empirical framework for selecting AI tools based on functional specialisations, thus facilitating sustainable and transparent adoption decisions for marketing professionals

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen Acatrinei & Claudia Maria Miu, 2025. "AI vs. Human-Written Email Marketing: Consumer Insights for Sustainable Communication," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(S19), pages 1256-1256, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:s19:p:1256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3479.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmen Acatrinei & Ingrid Georgeta Apostol & Lucia Nicoleta Barbu & Raluca-Giorgiana Chivu (Popa) & Mihai-Cristian Orzan, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence in Digital Marketing: Enhancing Consumer Engagement and Supporting Sustainable Behavior Through Social and Mobile Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Chen, Yaqi & Wang, Haizhong & Rao Hill, Sally & Li, Binglian, 2024. "Consumer attitudes toward AI-generated ads: Appeal types, self-efficacy and AI’s social role," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Park, Jeongeun & Oh, Changhoon & Kim, Ha Young, 2024. "AI vs. human-generated content and accounts on Instagram: User preferences, evaluations, and ethical considerations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Bianca-Eugenia Leoveanu-Soare & Ina Nimerenco, 2025. "Mapping Environmentally Sustainable Business: A Bibliometric Analysis," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Alina Mihaela Dima & Cristian Badarinza (ed.), Innovative Approaches in Economics, Leadership, and Technology, pages 111-124, Springer.
    5. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    6. Giani Ionel Gradinaru & Vasile Dinu & Catalin-Laurentiu Rotaru & Andreea Toma, 2024. "The Development of Educational Competences for Romanian Students in the Context of the Evolution of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(65), pages 1-14, February.
    7. Kirk, Colleen P. & Givi, Julian, 2025. "The AI-authorship effect: Understanding authenticity, moral disgust, and consumer responses to AI-generated marketing communications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hou, Chenxuan & Li, Tingting & Gu, Yanzhang, 2026. "Artificial intelligence versus human providers for personalized solutions? The influence of expected group size and perceived uniqueness on adoption intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Kumar, Aman & Shankar, Amit & Hollebeek, Linda D. & Behl, Abhishek & Lim, Weng Marc, 2025. "Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) revolution: A deep dive into GenAI adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Jung, Timothy & Koghut, Maksym & Lee, Eunseo & Kwon, Ohbyung, 2025. "Artificial creativity in luxury advertising: How trust and perceived humanness drive consumer response to AI-generated content," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "Determinants of Industrial Internet of Things Adoption in German Manufacturing Companies," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Marjan Shamsi & Tatiana Iakovleva & Espen Olsen & Richard P. Bagozzi, 2021. "Employees’ Work-Related Well-Being during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrated Perspective of Technology Acceptance Model and JD-R Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Babak Naysary & Ruth Tacneng & Amine Tarazi, 2021. "Adoption of fintech services: role of saving and borrowing mechanisms," Working Papers hal-03335254, HAL.
    7. Mohammed Akhmaaj, Asmaeil Ali & Sharif, Mohamed Omar, 2024. "The effects of planned behavior model constructs and technology acceptance model constructs on online purchasing behavior: An empirical study on internet users in the Libya city of Tripoli," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    8. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    9. Awni Rawashdeh, 2013. "Study Toward The Understanding Of Behavioral Intention To Use A Customer Relationship Management (Crm) Systems," Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, Far East Research Centre, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, September.
    10. Casaló, Luis V. & Flavián, Carlos & Guinalíu, Miguel, 2010. "Determinants of the intention to participate in firm-hosted online travel communities and effects on consumer behavioral intentions," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 898-911.
    11. Dahlberg, Tomi & Öörni, Anssi, 2006. "Finnish consumers' expectations on developments and changes in payment habits: survey in connection with the research project "Finnish payment habits 2010"," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 32/2006, Bank of Finland.
    12. Melih Engin & Fatih Gürses, 2019. "Adoption of Hospital Information Systems in Public Hospitals in Turkey: An Analysis with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Sabakun Naher Shetu, 2025. "Determinants of generation Z consumers’ mobile online shopping apps continuance intention to use during COVID-19 and beyond—an empirical study," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Donald Amoroso & Ricardo Lim & Francisco L. Roman, 2021. "The Effect of Reciprocity on Mobile Wallet Intention: A Study of Filipino Consumers," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 12(2), pages 57-83, April.
    15. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    16. Morosan, Cristian, 2016. "An empirical examination of U.S. travelers’ intentions to use biometric e-gates in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-128.
    17. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    18. Lawrence Bunnell & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Victoria Y. Yoon, 0. "RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-42.
    19. Issa Mohamed Al Dafaei & Zurida Ismail & Mohd Ali Samsudin & Firas Jalal Shakir, 2013. "The Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy towards the Relationship Between Attitudes And Level of Use Towards Instructional Computer Technology in Oman," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(12), pages 2382-2398, December.
    20. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Féniès, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M37 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Advertising
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:s19:p:1256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.