IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v27y2025i69p656.html

Investment Allocation Method for Distribution Networks Based on a Panel Data Model and an Incentive–Penalty Mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Zhang

    (State Grid Shanxi Electric Power Company Yuncheng Power Supply)

  • Jianzhou Wen

    (State Grid Shanxi Electric Power Company Yuncheng Power Supply)

  • Zhen Lu

    (State Grid Shanxi Electric Power Company Yuncheng Power Supply)

  • Jiang Qian

    (State Grid Shanxi Electric Power Company Yuncheng Power Supply)

  • Ning Wei

    (State Grid Shanxi Electric Power Company Yuncheng Power Supply)

Abstract

The scale of distribution network construction is huge and the differences in construction areas are significant. The accuracy of investment strategies would directly affect the effectiveness of upgrading distribution networks. In response to the current subjectivity and lack of precision in the distribution network investment allocation process, this study proposed a method to allocate the investment amount to distribution networks based on a panel data model and an incentive–penalty mechanism. First, the type of panel data model was selected using the joint hypothesis test and the Hausman test. Second, the initial allocation of the investment amount was calculated based on the selected panel data model. Third, investment productivity in each region in recent years was calculated using the data envelope analysis model. Given the variations in the importance of information during different periods, the concept of time degree was introduced to establish a time degree model. The weights of the model during different periods were assigned to the investment productivity and then the sum was calculated separately to obtain the comprehensive investment productivity of each distribution network. The final allocation of the investment amount for each distribution network was obtained based on its initial allocation of the investment amount and the comprehensive investment productivity. The case study showed the following points. (1) The differences among the distribution networks were significant and, thus, the fixed effects model could be employed to effectively compute the investment scale. (2) Given the differences in the construction and investment productivity of various distribution networks, the proposed method to calculate the complete investment productivity could be used to adjust the allocation of the investment amount and achieve an optimal allocation of funds. The research results exhibited practical significance in improving the investment allocation strategy of distribution networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Zhang & Jianzhou Wen & Zhen Lu & Jiang Qian & Ning Wei, 2025. "Investment Allocation Method for Distribution Networks Based on a Panel Data Model and an Incentive–Penalty Mechanism," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(69), pages 656-656, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:69:p:656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3428.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaomin Xu & Luyao Peng & Zhengsen Ji & Shipeng Zheng & Zhuxiao Tian & Shiping Geng, 2021. "Research on Substation Project Cost Prediction Based on Sparrow Search Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Kati Koponen & Elisabeth Le Net, 2021. "Towards robust renewable energy investment decisions at the territorial level," Post-Print cea-03216464, HAL.
    3. Farah, Sleiman & Andresen, Gorm Bruun, 2024. "Investment-based optimisation of energy storage design parameters in a grid-connected hybrid renewable energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    4. Hugo Brise o & Omar Rojas, 2020. "Factors Associated with Electricity Losses: A Panel Data Perspective," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 281-286.
    5. Ibrahim Yilmaz, 2023. "A Hybrid DEA–Fuzzy COPRAS Approach to the Evaluation of Renewable Energy: A Case of Wind Farms in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Koponen, Kati & Le Net, Elisabeth, 2021. "Towards robust renewable energy investment decisions at the territorial level," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    7. Şengül, Ümran & Eren, Miraç & Eslamian Shiraz, Seyedhadi & Gezder, Volkan & Şengül, Ahmet Bilal, 2015. "Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 617-625.
    8. Lei Gao & Zhen-Yu Zhao & Cui Li, 2022. "An Investment Decision-Making Approach for Power Grid Projects: A Multi-Objective Optimization Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Dariush Akbarian, 2020. "A new DEA ranking system based on interval cross efficiency and interval analytic hierarchy process methods," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(3), pages 344-363.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mostafayi Darmian, Sobhan & Tavana, Madjid & Ribeiro-Navarrete, Samuel, 2024. "An investment evaluation and incentive allocation model for public-private partnerships in renewable energy development projects," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Karaaslan, Abdulkerim & Gezen, Mesliha, 2022. "The evaluation of renewable energy resources in Turkey by integer multi-objective selection problem with interval coefficient," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 842-854.
    3. Telikani, Akbar & Rossi, Mosé & Khajehali, Naghmeh & Renzi, Massimiliano, 2023. "Pumps-as-Turbines’ (PaTs) performance prediction improvement using evolutionary artificial neural networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PA).
    4. Tianran Ding & Bernhard Steubing & Wouter Achten, 2022. "Coupling optimization with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/352783, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    5. Tianran Ding & Bernhard Steubing & Wouter Achten, 2022. "Coupling optimization with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359529, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Solangi, Yasir Ahmed & Magazzino, Cosimo, 2025. "Evaluating financial implications of renewable energy for climate action and sustainable development goals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    7. Netzah Calamaro & Avihai Ofir & Doron Shmilovitz, 2021. "Application of Enhanced CPC for Load Identification, Preventive Maintenance and Grid Interpretation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-41, June.
    8. Gökay Yörük & Ugur Bac & Fatma Yerlikaya-Özkurt & Kamil Demirberk Ünlü, 2023. "Strategic Electricity Production Planning of Turkey via Mixed Integer Programming Based on Time Series Forecasting," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Nie, S. & Huang, Z.C. & Huang, G.H. & Yu, L. & Liu, J., 2018. "Optimization of electric power systems with cost minimization and environmental-impact mitigation under multiple uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 249-267.
    10. Or, Bartu & Bilgin, Gozde & Akcay, Emre Caner & Dikmen, Irem & Birgonul, M. Talat, 2024. "Real options valuation of photovoltaic investments: A case from Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    11. Çolak, Murat & Kaya, İhsan, 2017. "Prioritization of renewable energy alternatives by using an integrated fuzzy MCDM model: A real case application for Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 840-853.
    12. Tan, R.R. & Aviso, K.B. & Ng, D.K.S., 2019. "Optimization models for financing innovations in green energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Hongyi Sun & Bingqian Zhang & Wenbin Ni, 2022. "A Hybrid Model Based on SEM and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Supplier Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Yilan, Gülşah & Kadirgan, M.A. Neşet & Çiftçioğlu, Gökçen A., 2020. "Analysis of electricity generation options for sustainable energy decision making: The case of Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 519-529.
    15. Zheng, Xuejing & Yang, Xueqing & Miao, Hongfei & Liu, Huzhen & Yu, Yanzhe & Wang, Yaran & Zhang, Huan & You, Shijun, 2022. "A factor analysis and self-organizing map based evaluation approach for the renewable energy heating potentials at county level: A case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    16. Shoeib Faraji Abdolmaleki & Danial Esfandiary Abdolmaleki & Pastora M. Bello Bugallo, 2023. "Finding Sustainable Countries in Renewable Energy Sector: A Case Study for an EU Energy System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Lee, Chi-Chuan & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2019. "Oil price shocks and Chinese banking performance: Do country risks matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 46-53.
    18. Prabatha, Tharindu & Karunathilake, Hirushie & Mohammadpour Shotorbani, Amin & Sadiq, Rehan & Hewage, Kasun, 2021. "Community-level decentralized energy system planning under uncertainty: A comparison of mathematical models for strategy development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    19. Deveci, Muhammet & Cali, Umit & Kucuksari, Sadik & Erdogan, Nuh, 2020. "Interval type-2 fuzzy sets based multi-criteria decision-making model for offshore wind farm development in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    20. Saraswat, S.K. & Digalwar, Abhijeet K., 2021. "Evaluation of energy alternatives for sustainable development of energy sector in India: An integrated Shannon’s entropy fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 58-74.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C01 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Econometrics
    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:69:p:656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.