IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v27y2025i69p329.html

Modeling ESG Relationships with the Employability-Operational Growth-Profitability Trilogy in the European Food System

Author

Listed:
  • Mirela Sichigea

    (University of Craiova, Romania)

  • Laura Vasilescu

    (University of Craiova, Romania)

  • Lauren?iu Mihai

    (University of Craiova, Romania)

  • Catalina Sitnikov

    (University of Craiova, Romania)

Abstract

The development of a sustainable food system involves the coordinated efforts of all actors in the value chain. In this context, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices of companies play a key role, being closely related to their economic and financial resilience. The study uses the Gaussian Graphical Model (GGM) technique and the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to analyse the direct and indirect causal relationships between ESG ratings and the financial dimensions of European food companies: employability, operational growth, and profitability. The analysed data was extracted from the Refinitiv Eikon database over a 15-year period (2008-2023), covering 71 agri-food companies from the European Union (EU) member states, the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) states, and the United Kingdom. Through the methodological tools used, the research goes beyond the context of traditional models of deterministic dependencies and expands the analysis area, highlighting the connections between the categories of financial indicators (employability, operational growth, and profitability) and ESG ratings. Modelling the complex structure of links between the variables relevant to the management of the transition to climate neutrality creates new perspectives on the correlations between them, exercised directly and indirectly (the ability to mediate). Thus, the results revealed that that the transition to sustainable practices significantly affects the operational activities of companies (negative correlation between ESG ratings and operational growth variables). However, increased efficiency and productivity (positive relationship between ESG ratings and employability and profitability variables) can mitigate the negative impact and maintain the financial performance of companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirela Sichigea & Laura Vasilescu & Lauren?iu Mihai & Catalina Sitnikov, 2025. "Modeling ESG Relationships with the Employability-Operational Growth-Profitability Trilogy in the European Food System," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(69), pages 329-329, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:69:p:329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3407.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Velte & Martin Stawinoga, 2017. "Empirical research on corporate social responsibility assurance (CSRA): A literature review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1017-1066, November.
    2. Robert G. Eccles & Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2014. "The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2835-2857, November.
    3. Rui Albuquerque & Yrjö Koskinen & Chendi Zhang, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4451-4469, October.
    4. Rajesh Kumar Bhaskaran & Irene Wei Kiong Ting & Sujit K. Sukumaran & Saraswathy Divakaran Sumod, 2020. "Environmental, social and governance initiatives and wealth creation for firms: An empirical examination," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(5), pages 710-729, July.
    5. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    6. Gunta Grinberga-Zalite & Andra Zvirbule, 2022. "ESG Investing Issues in Food Industry Enterprises: Focusing on On-the-Job Training in Waste Management," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Mario Testa & Antonio D’Amato, 2017. "Corporate environmental responsibility and financial performance: does bidirectional causality work? Empirical evidence from the manufacturing industry," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(2), pages 221-234, June.
    8. Simone Pizzi & Fabio Caputo & Andrea Venturelli, 2020. "Does it pay to be an honest entrepreneur? Addressing the relationship between sustainable development and bankruptcy risk," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1478-1486, May.
    9. Samuel Drempetic & Christian Klein & Bernhard Zwergel, 2020. "The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 333-360, November.
    10. Amir Amel-Zadeh & George Serafeim, 2018. "Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(3), pages 87-103, July.
    11. Alexandra Danila, 2023. "The Role of ESG Factors in Improving Firm Financial Performance," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 688-693, December.
    12. Carlos Lassala & Andreea Apetrei & Juan Sapena, 2017. "Sustainability Matter and Financial Performance of Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Michael Maloni & Michael Brown, 2006. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the Supply Chain: An Application in the Food Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 35-52, September.
    14. Marco Taliento & Christian Favino & Antonio Netti, 2019. "Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Information on Economic Performance: Evidence of a Corporate ‘Sustainability Advantage’ from Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-26, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Staněk Gyönyör, Lucie & Horváth, Matúš & Stašek, Daniel & Stachoň, Martin, 2025. "The role of ESG factor in stock clustering based on risk-return-liquidity dimensions," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Ku-Hsieh Chen & Yingchao Zhang & Julie Ann Elston & Pei-Hwa Chen & Kang-Hua Hsu, 2026. "Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiative scores and firm performance: the importance and role of firm size," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 71-95, January.
    3. Iulia Lupu & Gheorghe Hurduzeu & Gabriela tigu & Georgiana Cosoveanu & Radu Ion Filip, 2025. "ESG Reporting and Systemic Risk: Evidence from European Markets," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(70), pages 869-869, August.
    4. Goretti Cabaleiro-Cerviño & Pedro Mendi, 2024. "ESG-driven innovation strategy and firm performance," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 14(1), pages 137-185, March.
    5. Hyun-Jung Nam & Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Doojin Ryu, 2024. "Firm value, ownership structure, and strategic approaches to ESG activities," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 14(1), pages 187-226, March.
    6. Stela Jorgji & Jonida Teta & Saeed Mousa & Vadim Ponkratov & Izabella Elyakova & Larisa Vatutina & Andrey Pozdnyaev & Tatiana Chernysheva & Elena Romanenko & Mikhail Kosov, 2024. "Sustainable Human Capital Management, ESG, and Firm Performance: Moderating Role of ESG Disclosure," Post-Print hal-05271946, HAL.
    7. Matthias Horn, 2023. "The Influence of ESG Ratings On Idiosyncratic Stock Risk: The Unrated, the Good, the Bad, and the Sinners," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 415-442, September.
    8. Chang Liu & Bowen Deng, 2023. "Is it really paid for sustainable development? The economic significance of firms' green practice," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 908-925, April.
    9. Muhammad Alamgir & Magdalena Osińska & Ming‐Chang Cheng, 2026. "Green Bonds Impact on Firm Performance: The Mediating Role of Financial Risk and Financial Quality," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S2), pages 1135-1154, March.
    10. Tiantian Meng & Dan Lu & Danni Yu & M. H. Yahya & Mohd Ashhari Zariyawati, 2024. "Is executive compensation aligned with the company’s ESG objectives? Evidence from Chinese listed companies based on the PSM-DID approach," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Ballester, Laura & González-Urteaga, Ana & Shen, Long, 2024. "Green bond issuance and credit risk: International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Ali Uyar & Simone Pizzi & Fabio Caputo & Cemil Kuzey & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2022. "Do shareholders reward or punish risky firms due to CSR reporting and assurance?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1596-1620, July.
    13. Murat Doğan & Muhammed Aslam Chelery Komath & Özlem Sayilir, 2025. "Credit rating prediction with ESG data using data mining methods," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Angelidis, Timotheos & Michairinas, Athanasios & Sakkas, Athanasios, 2024. "World ESG performance and economic activity," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    15. Dong, Haiyan & Zhang, Cong & Teng, Wei, 2025. "Top management team heterogeneity and corporate ESG performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    16. Huei-Fu Lu, 2024. "Can Fulfilling Sports Corporate Social Responsibility Serve as an Immunity During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Perspective From Social Capital and Corporate Financial Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.
    17. Gaurav Jyoti & Ashu Khanna, 2024. "How does sustainability performance affect firms' market performance? An empirical investigation in the Indian context," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 20457-20483, August.
    18. Jun Wan & Yuejia Wang & Yuan Wang, 2025. "Promoting or Hindering: The Impact of ESG Rating Differences on Energy Enterprises’ Green Transformation—A Causal Test from Double Machine-Learning Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Matthias Muck & Thomas Schmidl, 2026. "Relative to whom? The impact of peer groups on ESG ratings and financial performance," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 1-26, June.
    20. Vincenzo D'Apice & Giovanni Ferri & Mariantonietta Intonti, 2021. "Sustainable disclosure versus ESG intensity: Is there a cross effect between holding and SRI funds?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1496-1510, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:69:p:329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.