IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adf/journl/y2022id1442.html

University Campus: Interrelations of Educational Technologies and Models of Architectural Space Formation

Author

Listed:
  • M. V. Puchkov

Abstract

This article studies the main cultural and social processes influencing the formation of modern educational space. We analyze the traditional models of the educational cycle and propose a new one. The latter, unifying research, education and knowledge realization activities, reflects the interaction of education, research, experimental production and information processing as architectural space functions. There is revealed the system of trends affecting the architecture of scientific and educational facilities when forming high-quality spatial solutions of university campus facilities. The structure of the university complexes’ «intellectual capital» is supplemented by spatial, infrastructural capital and architectural image of the complex. A theoretical model of the functional and spatial structure represents the scientific and educational center as a modern technological architectural and spatial unit of campus. The author also gives some examples on forming scientific and educational complexes at various levels of designing architectural and spatial objects based on a modern model of a new educational cycle. This paper might be of use for specialists in the fields of education and architecture, as well as for scientific and educational facilities designers.

Suggested Citation

  • M. V. Puchkov, 2022. "University Campus: Interrelations of Educational Technologies and Models of Architectural Space Formation," University Management: Practice and Analysis, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and, vol. 25(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2022:id:1442
    DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2021.04.039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1442/1127
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15826/umpa.2021.04.039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:2600 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2022:id:1442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.