IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abf/journl/v13y2019i5p10222-10232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association Analysis of Scoliosis Based on Backpack Carrying Methods and Head Positions of Elementary School Students

Author

Listed:
  • Wei-Hsiu Hsu

    (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan 61363)

  • Li-Ju Lai

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan 61363)

  • Yo-Ping Huang

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan 10608
    Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taipei University, New Taipei City, Taiwan 23741)

  • Avichandra Singh

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan 10608)

Abstract

To prevent scoliosis development at early stage of growth in elementary school students, we assessed how body posture-namely the school bag carrying method and head position-can affect the morphology of the spinal column...

Suggested Citation

  • Wei-Hsiu Hsu & Li-Ju Lai & Yo-Ping Huang & Avichandra Singh, 2019. "Association Analysis of Scoliosis Based on Backpack Carrying Methods and Head Positions of Elementary School Students," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 13(5), pages 10222-10232, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:abf:journl:v:13:y:2019:i:5:p:10222-10232
    DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.13.002456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://biomedres.us/pdfs/BJSTR.MS.ID.002456.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://biomedres.us/fulltexts/BJSTR.MS.ID.002456.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26717/BJSTR.2019.13.002456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E M Malathy & Vijayalakshmi Muthuswamy, 2015. "Knapsack - TOPSIS Technique for Vertical Handover in Heterogeneous Wireless Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    3. Yan Wang & Chengyu Xi & Shuai Zhang & Wenyu Zhang & Dejian Yu, 2015. "Combined Approach for Government E-Tendering Using GA and TOPSIS with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chin-Tsai Lin & Chuan Lee & Wen-Yu Chen, 2007. "Using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate service performance of a travel intermediary," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 281-296, October.
    2. Eshtaiwi, Mohamed & Badi, Ibrahim & Abdulshahed, Ali & Erkan, Turan Erman, 2018. "Determination of key performance indicators for measuring airport success: A case study in Libya," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 28-34.
    3. Vetschera, Rudolf & Chen, Ye & Hipel, Keith W. & Marc Kilgour, D., 2010. "Robustness and information levels in case-based multiple criteria sorting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 841-852, May.
    4. S Wheeler, 2006. "An analysis of combined arms teaming for the Australian defence force," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(11), pages 1279-1288, November.
    5. Yawson, Robert M., 2009. "The ecological system of innovation: A new architectural framework for a functional evidence-based platform for science and innovation policy," MPRA Paper 33179, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. R. Srinivas & Ajit Pratap Singh, 2018. "Impact assessment of industrial wastewater discharge in a river basin using interval-valued fuzzy group decision-making and spatial approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 2373-2397, October.
    7. Kim, Daewon & Kim, Seongcheol, 2017. "Newspaper companies' determinants in adopting robot journalism," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 184-195.
    8. Shu-Ping Wan & Feng Wang & Gai-li Xu & Jiu-ying Dong & Jing Tang, 2017. "An intuitionistic fuzzy programming method for group decision making with interval-valued fuzzy preference relations," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 269-295, September.
    9. Joseph Gogodze, 2021. "Ranking Demographic Conditions: MCDM Approach," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 1-12, June.
    10. Honghao Zhang & Yong Peng & Guangdong Tian & Danqi Wang & Pengpeng Xie, 2017. "Green material selection for sustainability: A hybrid MCDM approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, May.
    11. Fabio Blanco-Mesa & Anna M. Gil-Lafuente & José M. Merigó, 2018. "Subjective stakeholder dynamics relationships treatment: a methodological approach using fuzzy decision-making," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 441-472, December.
    12. Oleg Uzhga-Rebrov & Peter Grabusts, 2023. "Methodology for Environmental Risk Analysis Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    13. Rocco S., Claudio M. & Hernandez, Elvis, 2015. "Robustness and sensitivity analysis in multiple criteria decision problems using rule learner techniques," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 297-304.
    14. Dong, Yucheng & Xu, Yinfeng & Li, Hongyi & Dai, Min, 2008. "A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 229-242, April.
    15. Govindan, Kannan & Kadziński, Miłosz & Ehling, Ronja & Miebs, Grzegorz, 2019. "Selection of a sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider based on the robustness analysis of an outranking graph kernel conducted with ELECTRE I and SMAA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-15.
    16. Garg, Chandra Prakash, 2016. "A robust hybrid decision model for evaluation and selection of the strategic alliance partner in the airline industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 55-66.
    17. Sándor Bozóki & Linda Dezső & Attila Poesz & József Temesi, 2013. "Analysis of pairwise comparison matrices: an empirical research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 511-528, December.
    18. A. Alvarado & M. Esteller & E. Quentin & J. Expósito, 2016. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and GIS Approach for Prioritization of Drinking Water Utilities Protection Based on their Vulnerability to Contamination," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(4), pages 1549-1566, March.
    19. Hughes, Warren R., 2009. "A statistical framework for strategic decision making with AHP: Probability assessment and Bayesian revision," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 463-470, April.
    20. Al-Khraif Rshood M. & Al-Mogarry Mohammed & Elsegaey Ibrahim & Salam Asharaf Abdul, 2022. "Saudi Arabia’s City-Ranking Index (SACRI) methodology executed: Preliminary findings," Journal of Economics and Management, Sciendo, vol. 44(1), pages 376-392, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Biomedical Sciences; Biomedical Research; Technical Research; Scoliosis; Left and Right Tilt; Head Position; Data Mining; Association Rules;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abf:journl:v:13:y:2019:i:5:p:10222-10232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Roy (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.