IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aaw/journl/v3y2018i2p34-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Trade in Peace Promotion: Assessment of Pak-India Relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Saima Gul

    (*Ph.D.Department of International Relations, University of Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.)

  • Syed Ali Shah

    (Assistant Professor,Department of Pakistan Studies,Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.)

  • Muhammad Usman Ullah

Abstract

The relationship between trade and peace has been debated by policymakers, academicians and the general public, often ending in contesting conclusions defining the exact role of trade in this complex relationship. While taking the case study of Pakistan and India, this argument becomes more central to understanding whether there is a possibility for the furtherance of trade relations between Pakistan and India. It is a perception that political and military tactics have always been active in deciding the relations between Pakistan and India. Hence, it is important to explore viable options, such as trade, for bringing positive change in relations. This article emphasizes that a liberal perspective may provide a better explanation of this relationship and concludes that trade possesses the capacity to play an active role in mollifying strained relations between Pakistan and India and begin an era of peace and harmony in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Saima Gul & Syed Ali Shah & Muhammad Usman Ullah, 2018. "The Role of Trade in Peace Promotion: Assessment of Pak-India Relationship," Global Economics Review, Humanity Only, vol. 3(2), pages 34-42, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:aaw:journl:v:3:y:2018:i:2:p:34-42
    DOI: 10.31703/ger.2018(III-II).04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://gerjournal.com/jadmin/Auther/31rvIolA2LALJouq9hkR/kniVVMQTnJ.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.gerjournal.com/issue/The-Role-of-Trade-in-Peace-Promotion-Assessment-of-Pak-India-Relationship
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31703/ger.2018(III-II).04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siow Yue Chia, 2013. "The ASEAN Economic Community : Progress, Challenges, and Prospects," Trade Working Papers 23717, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    2. Chia, Siow Yue, 2013. "The ASEAN Economic Community: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects," ADBI Working Papers 440, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    3. Havard Hegre, 2000. "Development and the Liberal Peace: What Does it Take to be a Trading State?," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 37(1), pages 5-30, January.
    4. Jain, Subhash C., 1999. "Prospects for a South Asian free trade agreement: problems and challenges," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 399-419, August.
    5. Katherine Barbieri, 1996. "Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict?," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 33(1), pages 29-49, February.
    6. Han Dorussen & Hugh Ward, 2010. "Trade networks and the Kantian peace," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 47(1), pages 29-42, January.
    7. Siow Yue Chia, 2013. "The ASEAN Economic Community : Progress, Challenges, and Prospects," Governance Working Papers 23717, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amador, João & Cabral, Sónia, 2014. "Global value chains: surveying drivers and measures," Working Paper Series 1739, European Central Bank.
    2. Sanchita Basu Das & Rahul Sen & Sadhana Srivastava, 2017. "A Partial Asean Customs Union Post 2015?," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 62(03), pages 593-617, June.
    3. Paul John, Pena, 2019. "An ASEAN Digital Single Market: Boosting the Aspiration for a Single Market in the Digital Era," MPRA Paper 95948, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Sujinda CHEMSRIPONG, 2016. "Skilled Labor Mobility in the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC): Experience from Thailand Labor Market," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 767-781, December.
    5. Laosutsan, Pheesphan & Shivakoti, Ganesh P. & Soni, Peeyush, 2016. "Comparative advantage and export potential of Thai vegetable products following the integration into the ASEAN Economic Community," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(4), December.
    6. Choong Lyol Lee & Shinji Takagi, 2015. "Assessing the Financial Landscape for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations Economic Community, 2015," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(1), pages 116-129, January.
    7. Viet HOANG, 2018. "Assessing the agricultural trade complementarity of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(10), pages 464-475.
    8. Sarah Huelser & Adam Heal, 2014. "Moving Freely? Labour Mobility in ASEAN," ARTNeT Policy Briefs 40, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    9. repec:ilo:ilowps:486525 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. João Amador & Sónia Cabral, 2014. "Global Value Chains: Surveying Drivers, Measures and Impacts," Working Papers w201403, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    11. Aalto, Pami, 2014. "Energy market integration and regional institutions in east Asia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 91-100.
    12. Iulia Monica Oehler-Şincai, 2014. "The Roles Played By China And Japan In The Asian Integration Process," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 9(3), pages 131-148, September.
    13. Techakanont, Kriengkrai., 2014. "Managing integration for better jobs and shared prosperity in the ASEAN Economic Community the case of Thailand's automotive sector," ILO Working Papers 994865253402676, International Labour Organization.
    14. Kaewkamol Pitakdumrongkit, 2017. "Beyond The Secretariat: Addressing Governance Issues In Asean Economic Community," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 62(03), pages 741-759, June.
    15. Elms, Deborah, 2020. "Impact of the ASEAN Economic Community and implications for Latin America," Documentos de Proyectos 46513, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    16. Mohamad D. Revindo & Christopher Gan, 2018. "Factors Affecting Variation in SMES' Export Intensity," LPEM FEBUI Working Papers 201820, LPEM, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, revised May 2018.
    17. Luigi Pascali, 2017. "The Wind of Change: Maritime Technology, Trade, and Economic Development," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(9), pages 2821-2854, September.
    18. Han Dorussen & Hugh Ward, 2011. "Disaggregated Trade Flows and International Conflict," Chapters, in: Christopher J. Coyne & Rachel L. Mathers (ed.), The Handbook on the Political Economy of War, chapter 25, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Jie Cai & Lian An, 2014. "Is Protectionism Rational Under the Financial Crisis? Analysis from the Perspective of International Political Relations," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(3), pages 278-299, March.
    20. Susan Ariel Aaronson & M. Rodwan Abouharb & K. Daniel Wang, 2015. "The Liberal Illusion Is Not a Complete Delusion: The WTO Helps Member States Keep the Peace Only When It Increases Trade," Global Economy Journal (GEJ), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(4), pages 455-484, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    RTAs; WTO; MFN; SAFTA; NDMA;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aaw:journl:v:3:y:2018:i:2:p:34-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: M Imran Khan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.humanityonly.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.