IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aaw/gprjrn/v4y2019i4p11-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between Consumption of TV Political Programs and Media Malaise in Shaping Political Efficacy among Students

Author

Listed:
  • Amber Mubeen

    (PhD Scholar, Institute of Communication Studies,University of The Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.)

  • Noshina Saleem

    (Professor,Institute of Communication Studies, University of The Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.)

  • Faiza Latif

    (Assistant Professor,Department of Mass Communication, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.)

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between consuming Pakistani TV political programs and media malaise to shape external efficacy among University students of Lahore. This study assumed that entrainment and talk shows make students cynical, distrustful and pessimistic; commonly known as media malaise which causes them to affect their external efficacy. Media malaise has been measured with two indicators namely cynicism and political participation. Students of two public sector Universities from Lahore city were taken as population and survey method was applied to get students responses. Data analysis (N=758) shares an interesting result, that there is a positive relationship between consumption of infotainment shows and media malaise, which shows that political programs are making students cynical, distrustful and pessimistic about the political milieu. This hypothesis was also accepted that media malaise effects reduce the external efficacy of students by making them distrustful about the political environment of the country

Suggested Citation

  • Amber Mubeen & Noshina Saleem & Faiza Latif, 2019. "Relationship between Consumption of TV Political Programs and Media Malaise in Shaping Political Efficacy among Students," Global Political Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(4), pages 11-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:aaw:gprjrn:v:4:y:2019:i:4:p:11-18
    DOI: 10.31703/gpr.2019(IV-IV).02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://gprjournal.com/jadmin/Auther/31rvIolA2LALJouq9hkR/lyriLoEe8B.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.gprjournal.com/issue/Relationship-between-Consumption-of-TV-Political-Programs-and-Media-Malaise-in-Shaping-Political-Efficacy-among-Students
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31703/gpr.2019(IV-IV).02?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robinson, Michael J., 1976. "Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of “The Selling of the Pentagon†," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 70(2), pages 409-432, June.
    2. Niemi, Richard G. & Craig, Stephen C. & Mattei, Franco, 1991. "Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(4), pages 1407-1413, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yusong Liu & Linyi Zheng & Wenrong Qian, 2023. "How Rural Residents Access News and Its Influence on Social Trust: Based on the Data of the China Family Panel Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Cheikh Tidiane Ndiaye & Armand Akomavo Dagoudo & Babacar Mbengue, 2021. "Growth and Income Distribution Inequalities in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Dynamic Model Approach [Croissance et inégalités de distribution des revenus en Afrique subsaharienne : une approche par les mod," Working Papers hal-03202484, HAL.
    3. S. Mo Jang & Yong Jin Park, 2013. "The Citizen as Issue Specialists in a Changing Media Environment," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Byoung Joon Kim & Seoyong Kim & Youngcheoul Kang & Sohee Kim, 2022. "Searching for the New Behavioral Model in Energy Transition Age: Analyzing the Forward and Reverse Causal Relationships between Belief, Attitude, and Behavior in Nuclear Policy across Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Alejandro Martínez & Juan Carlos Henao & Mario A. Pinzón Camargo, 2021. "Disrupción tecnológica, transformación digital y sociedad. Tomo I, ¿Cuarta revolución industrial? : contribuciones tecnosociales para la transformación social," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1280, October.
    6. Chee Wei Phang & Atreyi Kankanhalli & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2015. "What Motivates Contributors vs. Lurkers? An Investigation of Online Feedback Forums," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 773-792, December.
    7. Shivangi Bhatia & Seema Singh, 2019. "Empowering Women Through Financial Inclusion: A Study of Urban Slum," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 44(4), pages 182-197, December.
    8. Bruno S. Frey & Alois Stutzer, "undated". "The Role of Direct Democracy and Federalism in Local Power," IEW - Working Papers 209, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    9. Blesse, Sebastian & Heinemann, Friedrich, 2020. "Citizens’ trade-offs in state merger decisions: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 438-471.
    10. Luigi Droste, 2021. "Feeling Left Behind by Political Decisionmakers: Anti-Establishment Sentiment in Contemporary Democracies," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 288-300.
    11. Cristian BRANCU & Oana TURCU, 2023. "The Role of Media Consumption in Building Trust in the Romanian Mass Media," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(2), pages 293-300, May.
    12. Yueping Zheng & Hindy Lauer Schachter, 2017. "Explaining Citizens’ E-Participation Use: the Role of Perceived Advantages," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 409-428, September.
    13. Daniel Hart & Robert Atkins, 2011. "American Sixteen- and Seventeen-Year-Olds Are Ready to Vote," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 633(1), pages 201-222, January.
    14. Avi Ben-Bassat & Momi Dahan, 2016. "Biased Policy and Political Behavior," CESifo Working Paper Series 6269, CESifo.
    15. Andrea Ceron & Vincenzo Memoli, 2016. "Flames and Debates: Do Social Media Affect Satisfaction with Democracy?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 225-240, March.
    16. Bettina Schuck & Jennifer Shore, 2019. "How Intergenerational Mobility Shapes Attitudes toward Work and Welfare," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 682(1), pages 139-154, March.
    17. Bleck, Jaimie & Michelitch, Kristin, 2018. "Is women’s empowerment associated with political knowledge and opinions? Evidence from rural Mali," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 299-323.
    18. Bradley Allsop & Jacqueline Briggs & Ben Kisby, 2018. "Market Values and Youth Political Engagement in the UK: Towards an Agenda for Exploring the Psychological Impacts of Neo-Liberalism," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Simon Briole & Marc Gurgand & Eric Maurin & Sandra McNally & Jenifer Ruiz-Valenzuela & Daniel Santin, 2022. "The making of civic virtues: a school-based experiment in three countries," CEP Discussion Papers dp1830, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    20. Fierro, Pedro & Aroca, Patricio & Navia, Patricio, 2020. "How people access the internet and the democratic divide: Evidence from the Chilean region of Valparaiso 2017, 2018 and 2019," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cynicism; External Political Efficacy; Media Malaise; Political Participation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aaw:gprjrn:v:4:y:2019:i:4:p:11-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: M Imran Khan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.humanityonly.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.