IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aat/journl/y2014i3p190-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competition: E-Com Versus Traditional Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Elena BADARAU

    (senior lecturer, IRIM)

Abstract

Electronic trading, sometimes called e-trading, is a method of trading securities (such as stocks, and bonds), foreign exchange or financial derivatives electronically. Information technology is used to bring together buyers and sellers through an electronic trading platform and network to create virtual market places such as NASDAQ, NYSE Arca and Globex which are also known as electronic communication networks (ECNs). Electronic trading is rapidly replacing human trading in global securities markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena BADARAU, 2014. "Competition: E-Com Versus Traditional Trade," Economy and Sociology, The Journal Economy and Sociology, issue 3, pages 190-200.
    • Handle: RePEc:aat:journl:y:2014:i:3:p:190-200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://old.economy-sociology.ince.md/?edmc=874
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marie-Elise Dumans, 2002. "Competition between on Line Retailers and Traditional Shops," Working Papers 2002-30, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    2. Michael D. Smith & Erik Brynjolfsson, 2001. "Consumer Decision‐making at an Internet Shopbot: Brand Still Matters," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(4), pages 541-558, December.
    3. Thisse, Jacques-Francois & Vives, Xavier, 1988. "On the Strategic Choice of Spatial Price Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(1), pages 122-137, March.
    4. repec:bla:jindec:v:49:y:2001:i:4:p:541-58 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena BADARAU, 2014. "Competition: E-Com Versus Traditional Trade," ECONOMY AND SOCIOLOGY: Theoretical and Scientifical Journal, Socionet;Complexul Editorial "INCE", issue 3, pages 190-200.
    2. Gokan,Toshitaka & Thisse,Jacques-François & Zhu,Xiwei, 2025. "Spatial pricing and the strategic choice of retail formats," IDE Discussion Papers 968, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    3. Belleflamme,Paul & Peitz,Martin, 2015. "Industrial Organization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107069978, November.
    4. Golombek, Rolf & Hoel, Michael & Kverndokk, Snorre & Ninfole, Stefano & Rosendahl, Knut Einar, 2025. "Competition for carbon storage," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    5. Steel, Will & Daglish, Toby & Marriott, Lisa & Gemmell, Norman & Howell, Bronwyn, 2013. "E-Commerce and its effect upon the Retail Industry and Government Revenue," Working Paper Series 4333, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    6. Gilbert E. Metcalf & George Norman, 2002. "Oligopoly Deregulation in General Equilibrium: A Tax Neutralization Result," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0210, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    7. Mandell, Svante & Proost, Stef, 2016. "Why truck distance taxes are contagious and drive fuel taxes to the bottom," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-17.
    8. Jonathan Hamilton & Jacques-François Thisse, 1996. "Nonlinear pricing in spatial oligopoly," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 2(1), pages 379-397, December.
    9. Pradeep K. Chintagunta & Junhong Chu, 2021. "Geography as branding: Descriptive evidence from Taobao," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 53-92, March.
    10. Marc Möller & Makoto Watanabe, 2016. "Competition in the presence of individual demand uncertainty," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 47(2), pages 273-292, May.
    11. Hossain Tanjim & Morgan John, 2006. "...Plus Shipping and Handling: Revenue (Non) Equivalence in Field Experiments on eBay," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-30, January.
    12. Xue Bai & Rema Padman & Joseph Ramsey & Peter Spirtes, 2008. "Tabu Search-Enhanced Graphical Models for Classification in High Dimensions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 423-437, August.
    13. Anna Priester & Thomas Robbert & Stefan Roth, 2020. "A special price just for you: effects of personalized dynamic pricing on consumer fairness perceptions," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(2), pages 99-112, April.
    14. John S. Heywood & Guangliang Ye, 2009. "Mixed Oligopoly, Sequential Entry, And Spatial Price Discrimination," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 47(3), pages 589-597, July.
    15. Vidyanand Choudhary & Anindya Ghose & Tridas Mukhopadhyay & Uday Rajan, 2005. "Personalized Pricing and Quality Differentiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(7), pages 1120-1130, July.
    16. Shin‐kun Peng, 2004. "Spatial Monopoly with Product Differentiation," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 70(3), pages 646-660, January.
    17. Nicholas Economides & Przemyslaw Jeziorski, 2017. "Mobile Money in Tanzania," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 815-837, November.
    18. Yuxin Chen & Xinxin Li & Monic Sun, 2017. "Competitive Mobile Geo Targeting," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 666-682, September.
    19. Brett Danaher & Michael D. Smith & Rahul Telang, 2014. "Piracy and Copyright Enforcement Mechanisms," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 14(1), pages 25-61.
    20. Flavio Pino, 2022. "The microeconomics of data – a survey," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(3), pages 635-665, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aat:journl:y:2014:i:3:p:190-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iordachi Victoria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iefscmd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.