IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aan/journl/v7y2025i1p43-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Management and the Financial Performance of Listed Real Estate/Construction Companies in Nigeria: The Moderating Role of Board Structure

Author

Listed:
  • Asimiyu Kolawole Adegoke

    (Department of Banking and Finance, Achievers University Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria)

  • Akinwumi Olusegun Akinola

    (Department of Accounting, Emmanuel Alayande University of Education, Oyo, Nigeria)

Abstract

Purpose: The study explored the moderating effect of board structure (board size and gender diversity) on the nexus of operational risk, market risk and financial performance of listed real estate and construction companies in Nigeria. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study implemented ex-post facto research design to analyze the variables on a panel data of audited annual reports of selected companies. The sample size was the population size consisting using the census sampling method. The study used the secondary data retrieved from corporate annual reports and corporate websites of the companies listed on Nigeria exchange group between 2014 and 2023. The data was analyzed using panel least square method. Findings: Market risk exhibited a positive significance with ROA, while the negative relationship with Tobin’s Q was statistically insignificant. Operational risk exerts an insignificant negative and positive effect on ROA and Tobin's Q, respectively. Board structure has a favourable but insignificant moderating effect on the connection between market risk and ROA. However, board structure showed a significantly negative moderating effect on the link between market risk and Tobin's Q. Lastly, board structure showed positive but insignificant moderating effect on the relationship between operational risk and financial performance. Practical Implications: Companies should invest in more reliable risk management systems to effectively detect, evaluate, and reduce operational and market risks. This can lessen the detrimental effects of these risks on financial performance indicators like Tobin's Q and ROA. It is important to improve board governance procedures because board structure has a major moderating effect on the link between market risk and Tobin's Q. Originality/Value: Firstly, the study examined the influence of operational and market risks on financial performance. The study further explored the moderating effect of board structure (board size and gender diversity) on the nexus of operational risk, market risk and financial performance in the context of real estate and construction companies in Nigeria. Paper Type: Research Paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Asimiyu Kolawole Adegoke & Akinwumi Olusegun Akinola, 2025. "Risk Management and the Financial Performance of Listed Real Estate/Construction Companies in Nigeria: The Moderating Role of Board Structure," Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, University of National and World Economy, Institute for Economics and Politics, vol. 7(1), pages 43-55, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:aan:journl:v:7:y:2025:i:1:p:43-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unwe.bg/doi/FABA/2025.1/FABA.2025.1.04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hani El-Chaarani & Rebecca Abraham, 2022. "The Impact of Corporate Governance and Political Connectedness on the Financial Performance of Lebanese Banks during the Financial Crisis of 2019–2021," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    3. Ramzi Ben Slama & Aymen Ajina & Faten Lakhal, 2019. "Board gender diversity and firm financial performance in France: Empirical evidence using quantile difference-in-differences and dose-response models," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1626526-162, January.
    4. Hussain Muhammad & Stefania Migliori & Sana Mohsni, 2022. "Corporate governance and firm risk-taking: the moderating role of board gender diversity," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(3), pages 706-728, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suha Alawi, 2024. "The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Gender Diversity in Firm Performance," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(2), pages 97-110, March.
    2. Naima Lassoued & Imen Khanchel & Imen Fakhfakh, 2023. "Bank efficiency in Middle East and North African countries: Does political connection type matter?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-34, December.
    3. Luiz Eduardo Gaio & Angela Christina Lucas & Johan Hendrik Poker Junior & Marcio Marcelo Belli, 2024. "Gender diversity in management and corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4047-4067, September.
    4. Anda Adelina Suciu & Dragoș Păun & Florin Sebastian Duma, 2021. "Sustainability of Financial Performance in Relation to Gender Diverse Boards: A Comparative Analysis of French and Romanian Listed Companies on Stock Exchanges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Barbara Pistoresi & Erica Poma & Alberto Rinaldi, 2022. "Gender quota on corporate boards in Italy: spillover effects and financial performance," Department of Economics 0208, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    6. Mohammed T. Abusharbeh, 2024. "Technology-Profitability Paradox in Banking Sector: Evidence from Palestine," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14855-14873, September.
    7. Nur Ain Shahrier & Jessica Sze Yin Ho & Sanjaya Singh Gaur, 2020. "Ownership concentration, board characteristics and firm performance among Shariah-compliant companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(2), pages 365-388, June.
    8. Barbara Su, 2023. "Banking practices and borrowing firms’ financial reporting quality: evidence from bank cross-selling," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 201-236, March.
    9. Yeon‐Koo Che & Kathryn E. Spier, 2008. "Strategic judgment proofing," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 39(4), pages 926-948, December.
    10. Ichev, Riste & Valentinčič, Aljoša, 2025. "The effect of impact investing on performance of private firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    11. Fabrizio Rossi & Maretno Agus Harjoto, 2020. "Corporate non-financial disclosure, firm value, risk, and agency costs: evidence from Italian listed companies," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 1149-1181, October.
    12. Klapper, Leora F. & Love, Inessa, 2004. "Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 703-728, November.
    13. Sevcan Yesiltas, 2009. "Financing Constraints and Investment: The Case of Turkish Manufacturing Firms," 2009 Meeting Papers 874, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    14. Kane, Gregory D. & Velury, Uma, 2004. "The role of institutional ownership in the market for auditing services: an empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(9), pages 976-983, September.
    15. Tan, Monica & Liu, Bin, 2016. "CEO's managerial power, board committee memberships and idiosyncratic volatility," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 21-30.
    16. Theodore E. Christensen & Hang Pei & Spencer R. Pierce & Liang Tan, 2019. "Non-GAAP reporting following debt covenant violations," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 629-664, June.
    17. Ju Ryum Chung & Eun Jung Cho & Ho-Young Lee & Myungsoo Son, 2017. "The impact of labour unions on external auditor selection and audit scope: evidence from the Korean market," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(48), pages 4833-4850, October.
    18. Shin-ichi Fukuda, 2018. "Companies’ Financial Surpluses and Cash/Deposit Holdings," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 14(3), pages 369-396, July.
    19. Boubakri, Narjess & Ghouma, Hatem, 2010. "Control/ownership structure, creditor rights protection, and the cost of debt financing: International evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2481-2499, October.
    20. Hartarska, Valentina M. & Nadolnyak, Denis A., 2012. "Financing Constraints and Access to Credit in Post Crisis Environment: Evidence from New Farmers in Alabama," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124882, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Board Size; Gender Diversity; Financial Performance; Market Risk; Operation Risk.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aan:journl:v:7:y:2025:i:1:p:43-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yanko Hristozov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ienwebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.