IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aag/wpaper/v28y2024i1p47-74.html

The Impact of Climate Change on Financial Efficiency and The Financing Choices of Electricity Industrial Companies: Evidence from Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Huu Tuan Nguyen

    (SSI Securities Corporation)

  • Duy Suu Nguyen

    (Faculty of Accounting, Ton Duc Thang University (TDTU), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

Abstract

[Purpose] This study examines the ‘climate-finance paradox’ in Vietnam’s electricity sector, focusing on how the paradoxical forces of physical climate risks and economic incentives for carbon-intensive growth influence the firms’ financial policies. Our research contributes to Decision Sciences by examining the trade-offs and decision-making strategies that firms use to navigate the conflicting environmental and economic objectives under uncertainty. [Design/Methodology/Approach] We employ a fixed-effects two-way panel regression model using data from 40 Vietnamese power companies spanning 2003–2022, capturing both physical and transition risk dimensions. [Findings] Physical climate risks (rising temperatures and natural disasters) significantly impair financial health, reducing profitability and long-term debt while increasing short-term debt and precautionary cash holdings. In contrast, higher greenhouse gas emissions (indicating intensive economic activity) correlate with improved financial performance, enhanced long-term debt capacity, and reduced cash hoarding. This reveals a fundamental conflict between climate risk mitigation and the incentives for short-term economic growth. [Research Limitations/Implications] The paradox highlights a market failure in which short-term financial signals reward activities that undermine long-term sustainability. For academics, this necessitates theoretical models that incorporate the conflicting dynamics between climate and economy in emerging markets. [Practical Implications] Managers and investors must recognize emission-linked financial performance as a misleading indicator of long-term value, while policymakers require interventions (e.g., carbon pricing, green financing) to realign corporate incentives with climate objectives. [Originality/Value] This is the first empirical study on the climate-finance paradox in Vietnam’s electricity sector, revealing how physical climate risks and emission-intensive growth simultaneously influence corporate financial policies. Our analysis establishes boundary conditions for mainstream climate finance theories in emerging economies with high climate vulnerability and rapid industrialization, utilizing a unique 20-year panel dataset that captures previously unexamined dual risk dimensions in Vietnam.

Suggested Citation

  • Huu Tuan Nguyen & Duy Suu Nguyen, 2024. "The Impact of Climate Change on Financial Efficiency and The Financing Choices of Electricity Industrial Companies: Evidence from Vietnam," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 28(1), pages 47-74, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:aag:wpaper:v:28:y:2024:i:1:p:47-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iads.site/the-impact-of-climate-change-on-financial-efficiency-and-the-financing-choices-of-electricity-industrial-companies-evidence-from-vietnam/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://iads.site/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/The-Impact-of-Climate-Change-on-Financial-Efficiency-and-The-Financing-Choices-of-Electricity-Industrial-Companies-Evidence-from-Vietnam.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Le Ngoc Thuy Trang & Do Thi Thanh Nhan & Dung Nguyen Thi Phuong & Wing-Keung Wong, 2022. "The Effects Of Selected Financial Ratios On Profitability: An Empirical Analysis Of Real Estate Firms In Vietnam," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-29, March.
    2. Francisco Pérez-González & Hayong Yun, 2013. "Risk Management and Firm Value: Evidence from Weather Derivatives," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 68(5), pages 2143-2176, October.
    3. Lingyun He & Chen Wu & Xiaolei Yang & Jiao Liu, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility, green credit, and corporate performance: an empirical analysis based on the mining, power, and steel industries of China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 95(1), pages 73-89, January.
    4. Karpoff, Jonathan M & Lott, John R, Jr & Wehrly, Eric W, 2005. "The Reputational Penalties for Environmental Violations: Empirical Evidence," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 48(2), pages 653-675, October.
    5. Jacek Jaworski & Leszek Czerwonka, 2022. "Which Determinants Matter for Working Capital Management in Energy Industry? The Case of European Union Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Yi Zhou & Jiapeng Dai & Umar Farooq & Jaleel Ahmed & Klunko Natalia Sergeevna, 2023. "National Culture as a Determinant of Corporate Capital Structure: Empirical Evidence from Three Emerging Economies," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 27(2), pages 122-144, June.
    7. Sudheer Chava, 2014. "Environmental Externalities and Cost of Capital," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(9), pages 2223-2247, September.
    8. Melissa Dell & Benjamin F. Jones & Benjamin A. Olken, 2014. "What Do We Learn from the Weather? The New Climate-Economy Literature," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 52(3), pages 740-798, September.
    9. Alex Bowen & Sarah Cochrane & Samuel Fankhauser, 2012. "Climate change, adaptation and economic growth," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 113(2), pages 95-106, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shabir, Mohsin & Jiang, Ping & Shahab, Yasir & Wang, Wenhao & Işık, Özcan & Mehroush, Iqra, 2024. "Diversification and bank stability: Role of political instability and climate risk," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PB), pages 63-92.
    2. Bakkar, Yassine, 2023. "Climate Risk and Bank Capital Structure," QBS Working Paper Series 2023/04, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's Business School.
    3. Phan, Dinh Hoang Bach & Tran, Vuong Thao & Ming, Tee Chwee & Le, Anh, 2022. "Carbon risk and corporate investment: A cross-country evidence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    4. Mosab I. Tabash & Adel Ahmed & Linda Nalini Daniel & Yasmeen Elsantil, 2023. "Impact of Board Ownership Structure on Firm Value and Excessive Cash Holdings: Evidence from Pakistan," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 27(3), pages 109-134, September.
    5. Lee H. Seltzer & Laura Starks & Qifei Zhu, 2022. "Climate Regulatory Risk and Corporate Bonds," NBER Working Papers 29994, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Arian, Adam & Naeem, Muhammad A., 2025. "Climate risk and corporate investment behavior in emerging economies," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Krüger, Philipp, 2015. "Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 304-329.
    8. Hasan, Iftekhar & Noth, Felix & Tonzer, Lena, 2019. "Thou shalt not bear false witness against your customers: Cultural norms and the Volkswagen scandal," IWH Discussion Papers 21/2019, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    9. David Gilchrist & Jing Yu & Rui Zhong, 2021. "The Limits of Green Finance: A Survey of Literature in the Context of Green Bonds and Green Loans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    10. Stephen Bahadar & Muhammad Nadeem & Rashid Zaman, 2023. "Toxic chemical releases and idiosyncratic return volatility: A prospect theory perspective," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 2109-2143, June.
    11. Zhou, Peng & Mo, Lingyu & Tan, Changchun & Wu, Huaqing, 2025. "Carbon regulatory risk exposure in the bond market: A quasi-natural experiment in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Zhu, Bo & Hou, Rui, 2022. "Carbon risk and dividend policy: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Liu, Xiaofeng & Feng, Hua & Tian, Gaoliang & Zhang, Ting, 2024. "Environmental legal institutions and management earnings forecasts: Evidence from the establishment of environmental courts in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 545-573.
    14. Zeng, Huixiang & Ren, Lei & Chen, Xiaohong & Zhou, Qiong & Zhang, Tao & Cheng, Xu, 2024. "Punishment or deterrence? Environmental justice construction and corporate equity financing––Evidence from environmental courts," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    15. Kling, Gerhard & Volz, Ulrich & Murinde, Victor & Ayas, Sibel, 2021. "The impact of climate vulnerability on firms’ cost of capital and access to finance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Li, Lei & Zheng, Yifan & Ma, Shaojun & Ma, Xiaoyu & Zuo, Jian & Goodsite, Michael, 2025. "Unfavorable weather, favorable insights: Exploring the impact of extreme climate on green total factor productivity," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 626-640.
    17. Wolfgang Breuer & Moritz Felde & Bertram I. Steininger, 2017. "The Financial Impact of Firm Withdrawals from “State Sponsor of Terrorism” Countries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 533-547, September.
    18. Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala, 2020. "Weather Risk Management in Energy Sector: The Polish Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Goetz, Martin, 2019. "Financing conditions and toxic emissions," SAFE Working Paper Series 254, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    20. Wong, Jin Boon & Zhang, Qin, 2025. "The impact of political risks on carbon emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aag:wpaper:v:28:y:2024:i:1:p:47-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vincent Pan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dfasitw.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.