IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa02p121.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Spatial interaction modeling of interregional commodity flows

Author

Listed:
  • Celik, H. Murat
  • Guldmann, Jean-Michel

Abstract

Understanding the determinants of interregional commodity flows is critical for both transportation infrastructure planning (highways, railroad tracks, river/port facilities) and regional development policies (location of activities, reducing regional disparities). Unfortunately, limited data availability has, in the past, hindered empirical research in this area. Drawing from both the spatial price equilibrium theoretical framework and the empirical literature on spatial interaction modeling and international trade, this paper expands past spatial interaction models of commodity flows by incorporating new variables into the model, using a flexible Box-Cox functional form, and applying the analysis to all manufacturing commodities. The recently released 1993 U.S. Commodity Flows Survey provides the empirical basis for estimating state-to-state flow models for 16 commodity groups over the 48 continental U.S. states. Based on input-output considerations and in order to differentiate intermediate from final commodity demands, the new variables include more detailed descriptions of the economies of the origin and destination states, such as employment and value added for the commodity sector at the origin state, wholesale employment at both ends, manufacturing employment at the destination state, and population and per-capita income at both ends. In addition, the average establishment size for the commodity at the origin is intended to measure scale or diversification effects. The competitive or agglomerative effects of the economic spatial structure are captured with competing destination and intervening opportunities variables. In addition to the average hauling distance between states, the model includes dummy variables measuring whether (1) having a common physical border, and (2) the origin or destination states being custom districts, have an effect on flows. Overall, the results show that the selected variables and functional form are very successful in explaining flow variations. The optimized Box-Cox specification proves to be superior to the log-log one in all cases. The results include the following findings: (1) the distance effect is negative and highly significant, with bulkier products hauled over shorter distances; (2) the adjacency effect is significant, with neighboring states trading more with one another, even after accounting for distance; (3) the impact of the spatial structure is of the competitive type in most cases; (4) the effects of imports and exports are significant for specific commodities; (5) wholesale activities at both origins and destinations are important facilitators of commodity flows; (6) except in one case (furniture), flows increase with product diversification; and (7) the role of intermediate and final demands for the commodities are clearly reflected by the selected employment, population and per-capita income variables. Various areas for further research are outlined.

Suggested Citation

  • Celik, H. Murat & Guldmann, Jean-Michel, 2002. "Spatial interaction modeling of interregional commodity flows," ERSA conference papers ersa02p121, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa02p121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa02/cd-rom/papers/121.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krugman, Paul, 1980. "Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(5), pages 950-959, December.
    2. Jean-Michel Guldmann, 1999. "articles: Competing destinations and intervening opportunities interaction models of inter-city telecommunication flows," Papers in Regional Science, Springer;Regional Science Association International, vol. 78(2), pages 179-194.
    3. Jeffrey A. Frankel & Shang-Jin Wei, 1998. "Regionalization of World Trade and Currencies: Economics and Politics," NBER Chapters, in: The Regionalization of the World Economy, pages 189-226, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Jeffrey A. Frankel, 1998. "The Regionalization of the World Economy," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number fran98-1, March.
    5. Johannes Bröcker, 1989. "Partial Equilibrium Theory Of Interregional Trade And The Gravity Model," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(1), pages 7-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schwarm, Walter R. & Jackson, Randall W. & Okuyama, Yasuhide, 2006. "An Evaluation of Method for Constructing Commodity by Industry Flow Matrices," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 36(1), pages 1-10.
    2. Ni, Linglin & Wang, Xiaokun (Cara) & Zhang, Dapeng, 2016. "Impacts of information technology and urbanization on less-than-truckload freight flows in China: An analysis considering spatial effects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 12-25.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wendkouni Jean‐Baptiste Zongo & Bruno Larue & Carl Gaigné, 2023. "On export duration puzzles," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(2), pages 453-478, March.
    2. Anne‐Célia Disdier & Carl Gaigné & Cristina Herghelegiu, 2023. "Do standards improve the quality of traded products?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(4), pages 1238-1290, November.
    3. Murat Celik, H. & Guldmann, Jean-Michel, 2007. "Spatial interaction modeling of interregional commodity flows," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 147-162, June.
    4. Demet Yilmazkuday & Hakan Yilmazkuday, 2017. "The role of direct flights in trade costs," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 153(2), pages 249-270, May.
    5. Mr. Rikhil Bhavnani & Ms. Natalia T. Tamirisa & Mr. Arvind Subramanian & Mr. David T. Coe, 2002. "The Missing Globalization Puzzle," IMF Working Papers 2002/171, International Monetary Fund.
    6. James Harrigan, 2001. "Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws?," NBER Working Papers 8675, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Disdier, Anne-Celia & Mayer, Thierry, 2007. "Je t'aime, moi non plus: Bilateral opinions and international trade," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 1140-1159, December.
    8. Anne-Célia Disdier & Silvio Tai & Lionel Fontagné & Thierry Mayer, 2010. "Bilateral trade of cultural goods," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(4), pages 575-595, January.
    9. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h4dj9499g is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Paas, Tiiu & Tafenau, Egle, 2005. "European trade integration in the Baltic Sea Region - A gravity model based analysis," HWWA Discussion Papers 331, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    11. Portes, Richard & Rey, Helene, 2005. "The determinants of cross-border equity flows," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 269-296, March.
    12. Guillaume Daudin & Christine Rifflart & Danielle Schweisguth, 2011. "Who produces for whom in the world economy?," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 44(4), pages 1403-1437, November.
    13. Hornok, Cecília & Koren, Miklós, 2015. "Administrative barriers to trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(S1), pages 110-122.
    14. Fabien Candau & Florent Deisting & Julie Schlick, 2017. "How Income and Crowding Effects Influence the World Market for French Wines," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(5), pages 963-977, May.
    15. Andres Faiña & Jesus Lopez-Rodríguez, 2003. "Population Potentials and Development Levels: Empirical Findings in the European Union," ERSA conference papers ersa03p30, European Regional Science Association.
    16. I-Hui Cheng & Howard J. Wall, 2005. "Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 87(Jan), pages 49-63.
    17. J.A. Bikker, 2009. "An extended gravity model with substitution applied to international trade," Working Papers 09-17, Utrecht School of Economics.
    18. Lee, Jong-Wha & Shin, Kwanho, 2006. "Does regionalism lead to more global trade integration in East Asia?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 283-301, December.
    19. Céline Carrere & Jaime Melo De & John Wilson, 2011. "The Distance Effect and the Regionalization of the Trade of Low-Income Countries," CERDI Working papers halshs-00554326, HAL.
    20. Robert J. R. Elliott & Kengo Ikemoto, 2004. "AFTA and the Asian Crisis: Help or Hindrance to ASEAN Intra‐Regional Trade?," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 18(1), pages 1-23, March.
    21. Christopher M. Meissner, 2003. "Exchange-Rate Regimes and International Trade: Evidence from the Classical Gold Standard Era," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 344-353, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa02p121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.