Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Total Reward in the UK in the Public and Private Sectors

Contents:

Author Info

  • Danzer, Alexander M.

    ()
    (University of Munich)

  • Dolton, Peter

    ()
    (University of Sussex)

Abstract

Recent controversy has surrounded the relative value of public and private sector remuneration. We define a comprehensive measure of Total Reward (TR) which includes not just pay, but pensions and other 'benefits in kind', evaluate it as the present value of the sum of all these payments over the lifetime and compare it in the UK public and private sectors. Our results suggest that TR is equalized over the lifecycle for men while women have a clear TR advantage in the public sector by the end of their career. We suggest that the current controversy over public-private sector pension differentials and the perennial issues of public/private sector pay gaps requires a life time perspective and that the concept of TR is appropriate.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://ftp.iza.org/dp5656.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in its series IZA Discussion Papers with number 5656.

as in new window
Length: 45 pages
Date of creation: Apr 2011
Date of revision:
Publication status: published in: Labour Economics, 2012, 19 (4), 584-594
Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp5656

Contact details of provider:
Postal: IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany
Phone: +49 228 3894 223
Fax: +49 228 3894 180
Web page: http://www.iza.org

Order Information:
Postal: IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany
Email:

Related research

Keywords: wage differentials; total reward; compensation; public sector; pensions;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. James E. Pesando, 1984. "Valuing Pensions (Annuities) with Different Types of Inflation Protection in Total Compensation Comparisons," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 17(3), pages 569-87, August.
  2. Woodbury, Stephen A, 1983. "Substitution between Wage and Nonwage Benefits," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 73(1), pages 166-82, March.
  3. Quinn, Joseph F, 1982. "Pension Wealth of Government and Private Sector Workers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 72(2), pages 283-87, May.
  4. Dale Belman & John S. Heywood, 2004. "Public-Sector Wage Comparability: The Role of Earnings Dispersion," Public Finance Review, , , vol. 32(6), pages 567-587, November.
  5. Montgomery, Edward & Shaw, Kathryn, 1997. "Pensions and Wage Premia," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, Western Economic Association International, vol. 35(3), pages 510-22, July.
  6. Sarah Smith & James Banks, 2006. "Retirement in the UK," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK 06/140, Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
  7. Rowena Crawford & Carl Emmerson & Gemma Tetlow, 2010. "Occupational pension value in the public and private sectors," IFS Working Papers, Institute for Fiscal Studies W10/03, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
  8. Disney, Richard & Whitehouse, Edward, 1996. "What Are Occupational Pension Plan Entitlements Worth in Britain?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 63(250), pages 213-38, May.
  9. Alan L. Gustman & Olivia S. Mitchell & Andrew A. Samwick & Thomas L. Steinmeier, . "Evaluating Pension Entitlements," Pension Research Council Working Papers, Wharton School Pension Research Council, University of Pennsylvania 98-20, Wharton School Pension Research Council, University of Pennsylvania.
  10. Montgomery, Edward & Shaw, Kathryn & Benedict, Mary Ellen, 1992. "Pensions and Wages: An Hedonic Price Theory Approach," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 33(1), pages 111-28, February.
  11. Catrin Ormerod & Felix Ritchie, 2007. "Linking ASHE and LFS: can the main earnings sources be reconciled?," Economic and Labour Market Review, Palgrave Macmillan, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(3), pages 24-31, March.
  12. Chan, Sewin & Stevens, Ann Huff, 2001. "Job Loss and Employment Patterns of Older Workers," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(2), pages 484-521, April.
  13. Dolton, Peter J., 2006. "Teacher Supply," Handbook of the Economics of Education, Elsevier, Elsevier.
  14. H. Ada & Elizabeth Roberts & Robert Elliott & David Bell & Anthony Scott, 2006. "Comparing the New Earnings Survey (NES) and the Labour Force Survey (LFS): An Analysis of the differences between the data sets and their implications for the pattern of geographical pay in the UK," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 645-665.
  15. Richard Disney & Carl Emmerson & Gemma Tetlow, 2009. "What is a Public Sector Pension Worth?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(541), pages F517-F535, November.
  16. Richard Disney & Amanda Gosling, 1998. "Does it pay to work in the public sector?," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 19(4), pages 347-374, November.
  17. Cappellari, Lorenzo, 2002. "Earnings dynamics and uncertainty in Italy: how do they differ between the private and public sectors?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 477-496, September.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp5656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark Fallak).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.