A Mechanism-Design Approach to Speculative Trade
AbstractWhen agents hold non-common priors over an unverifiable state of nature which affects the outcome of their future actions, they have an incentive to bet on the outcome. We pose the following question: what are the limits on the agents' ability to realize gains from speculative bets when their prior belief is private information? We apply a 'mechanism design' approach to this question, in the context of a pair of models: a principal-agent model in which the two parties bet on the agent's future action, and a market model in which traders bet on the future price. We characterize interim-efficient bets in these environments, and their implementability as a function of fundamentals. In general, implementability of interim-efficient bets diminishes as the costs of manipulating the bet's outcome become more uneven across states or agents.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers in its series CEPR Discussion Papers with number 5434.
Date of creation: Dec 2005
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Centre for Economic Policy Research, 77 Bastwick Street, London EC1V 3PZ
Phone: 44 - 20 - 7183 8801
Fax: 44 - 20 - 7183 8820
Other versions of this item:
- D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
- D84 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Expectations; Speculations
- L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2006-01-29 (All new papers)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Jeff Ely, 2003.
"Foundations of Dominant Strategy Mechanisms,"
Theory workshop papers
658612000000000064, UCLA Department of Economics.
- Jeffrey C. Ely & Kim-Sau Chung, 2004. "Foundations of Dominant Strategy Mechanisms," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 169, Econometric Society.
- Kim-Sau Chung & Jeffrey C. Ely, 2003. "Foundations of Dominant Strategy Mechanisms," Discussion Papers 1372, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
- Allaz Blaise & Vila Jean-Luc, 1993. "Cournot Competition, Forward Markets and Efficiency," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 1-16, February.
- Peter Cramton & Robert Gibbons & Paul Klemperer, 1985.
"Dissolving a Partnership Efficiently,"
406, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
- Milgrom, Paul & Stokey, Nancy, 1982.
"Information, trade and common knowledge,"
Journal of Economic Theory,
Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 17-27, February.
- Dubey, Pradeep, 1982. "Price-Quantity Strategic Market Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 111-26, January.
- Eliaz, Kfir & Spiegler, Ran, 2005.
CEPR Discussion Papers
5433, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Roger B. Myerson & Mark A. Satterthwaite, 1981.
"Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading,"
469S, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
- Morris, Stephen, 1994. "Trade with Heterogeneous Prior Beliefs and Asymmetric Information," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(6), pages 1327-47, November.
- Eliaz, Kfir & Spiegler, Ran, 2004.
"Contracting with Diversely Naive Agents,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
4573, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Muhamet Yildiz, 2007.
"Wishful Thinking in Strategic Environments,"
Review of Economic Studies,
Oxford University Press, vol. 74(1), pages 319-344.
- Piero Gottardi & Jean-Marc Tallon & Paolo Ghirardato, 2009.
Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne
09072, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
- Piero Gottardi & Jean Marc Tallon & Paolo Ghirardato, 2011. "Flexible contracts," Economics Working Papers ECO2011/26, European University Institute.
- Piero Gottardi & Jean Marc Tallon & Paolo Ghirardato, 2009. "Flexible Contracts," Economics Working Papers ECO2009/34, European University Institute.
- Piero Gottardi & Jean-Marc Tallon & Paolo Ghirardato, 2009. "Flexible contracts," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 128, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
- Piero Gottardi & Jean-Marc Tallon & Paolo Ghirardato, 2011. "Flexible contracts," UniversitÃ© Paris1 PanthÃ©on-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00429784, HAL.
- Piero Gottardi & Jean Marc Tallon & Paolo Ghirardato, 2010. "Flexible Contracts," CESifo Working Paper Series 2927, CESifo Group Munich.
- Rajiv Sethi & Muhamet Yildiz, 2012.
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics,
American Economic Association, vol. 4(3), pages 57-95, August.
- Marco Angrisani & Antonio Guarino & Steffen Huck & Nathan Larson, 2008.
"No-Trade in the Laboratory,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
2436, CESifo Group Munich.
- Eliaz, K & Spiegler, R, 2009.
"Bargaining over bets,"
Open Access publications from University College London
http://discovery.ucl.ac.u, University College London.
- Mylovanov, Tymofiy & Tröger, Thomas, 2013. "Mechanism Design by an Informed Principal: The Quasi-Linear Private-Values Case," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 437, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
- Anja Sautmann, 2011. "Contracts for Agents with Biased Beliefs: Some Theory and an Experiment," Working Papers 2011-10, Brown University, Department of Economics.
- Stefano Galavotti & Nozomu Muto & Daisuke Oyama, 2011. "On efficient partnership dissolution under ex post individual rationality," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 87-123, September.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.