Wishful Thinking in Strategic Environments
AbstractTowards developing a theory of systematic biases about strategies, I analyse strategic implications of a particular bias: wishful thinking about the strategies. I identify a player as a wishful thinker if she hopes to enjoy the highest pay-off that is consistent with her information about the others' strategies. I develop a straightforward elimination process that characterizes the strategy profiles that are consistent with wishful thinking, mutual knowledge of wishful thinking, and so on. Every pure-strategy Nash equilibrium is consistent with common knowledge of wishful thinking. For generic two-person games, I further show that the pure Nash equilibrium strategies are the only strategies that are consistent with common knowledge of wishful thinking. My analysis also illustrates how one can characterize the strategic implications of general decision rules using the tools of game theory. Copyright 2007, Wiley-Blackwell.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Oxford University Press in its journal The Review of Economic Studies.
Volume (Year): 74 (2007)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Contact details of provider:
Other versions of this item:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Kfir Eliaz & Rani Spiegler, 2005.
"A Mechanism-Design Approach to Speculative Trade,"
784828000000000429, UCLA Department of Economics.
- Sergei Izmalkov & Muhamet Yildiz, 2009.
w0138, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
- Eliaz, K & Spiegler, R, 2009. "Bargaining over bets," Open Access publications from University College London http://discovery.ucl.ac.u, University College London.
- Eliaz, Kfir & Spiegler, Ran, 2009. "Bargaining over bets," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 78-97, May.
- Edward Cartwright & Amrish Patel, 2010.
"Public Goods, Social Norms, and Naïve Beliefs,"
Journal of Public Economic Theory,
Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 12(2), pages 199-223, 04.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.