Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

A Comparison of Process and Ingredient Claims on US and EU Foods

Contents:

Author Info

  • STATON, John L
  • HOOKER, Neal H
  • SALNIKOVA, Ekaterina
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Significant research has been conducted to identify the extent to which consumers use label information. Much of this relates to nutrition labeling, yet increasingly foods are being marketed with ever more ingredient and process claims such as all natural or organic. Key studies consider the determinants of label use, debates over mandatory labeling, the label formats preferred by consumers, and the effect of nutrition label use on purchase patterns and dietary behavior. However, much less research has been attempted that tracks the claims actually made on food labels. This paper addresses this gap by comparing claims across the US and EU. The objective of this paper is to compare and identify All Natural, Organic and Vegetarian package claims that are actually made on 32,289 food labels in 2009 and to compare the results between the US and the EU.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://crd-aida.ro/RePEc/rdc/v2i1/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Romanian Distribution Committee in its journal Romanian Distribution Committee Magazine Volume 2 Issue 1.

    Volume (Year): 2 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 1 (June)
    Pages: 02-12

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:rdc:journl:v:2:y:2011:i:1:p:02-12

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.distribution-magazine.eu

    Related research

    Keywords: All natural claims; organic claims; Vegetarian claims; packaging; labels;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Andreas C. Drichoutis & Panagiotis Lazaridis & Rodolfo M. Nayga, 2005. "Nutrition knowledge and consumer use of nutritional food labels," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 93-118, March.
    2. Julie A. Caswell & Eliza M. Mojduszka, 1996. "Using Informational Labeling to Influence the Market for Quality in Food Products," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(5), pages 1248-1253.
    3. Batte, Marvin T. & Beaverson, Jeremy & Hooker, Neal H. & Haab, Timothy C., 2004. "Customer Willingness To Pay For Multi-Ingredient, Processed Organic Food Products," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20194, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Dimitri, Carolyn & Greene, Catherine R., 2002. "Recent Growth Patterns In The U.S. Organic Foods Market," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33715, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rdc:journl:v:2:y:2011:i:1:p:02-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Theodor Valentin Purcarea).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.