This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Appropriating signs and meaning: the elusive economics of trademark

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Giovanni B. Ramello
Francesco Silva

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This article deals with the economic analysis of trademark. Its presence in markets is originally connected with the problem of information asymmetries and the need to provide information for assisting exchanges so as to avert the market failure brought about by adverse selection. However, this information-conveying function is also accompanied by a differentiation effect, arising from the power of persuasion that signs can exert on individuals. The exploitation of differentiation has given rise to the practice of branding, which ties markets and consumption to the realms of meaning and experience. Branding is so all-pervasive in today's economy as to have somehow transfigured it, so that the role of persuasion is now pre-eminent. The mainstream economic theory tends to resist acknowledging this change which to a large extent calls into question well-established hypotheses and theoretical tools. The general response has therefore been to assume that the informational role of trademark predominates and to use this hypothesis to construct models, welfare evaluations, and policy prescriptions that bear little or no relation to the actual markets. The opposing approach--in the shadow of the Nelson's and Arrow's seminal papers on the economics of information--is to recognize the idiosyncratic character of information and therefore draw conclusions and devise solutions that, while still based upon the welfare criterion, also incorporate a wider awareness and a deeper representation of the scenario under study. The present work attempts to move in this direction, showing how different disciplines can provide some key epistemological tools for enabling economists to effectively evaluate the welfare outcomes of the introduction and progressive alteration of a particular intellectual property right within the realm of signs and meanings. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Oxford University Press in its journal Industrial and Corporate Change.

Volume (Year): 15 (2006)
Issue (Month): 6 (December)
Pages: 937-963
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:15:y:2006:i:6:p:937-963

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Fax: 01865 267 985
Email:
Web page: http://icc.oupjournals.org/

Order Information:
Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Ravazzi, Stefania, 2001. "La lettura contemporanea del cosiddetto dibattito fra Hobbes e Hume," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 18, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  2. Bissey, Marie-Edith & Canegallo, Claudia & Ortona, Guido & Scacciati, Francesco, 2003. "Competition vs. Cooperation. An Experimental Inquiry," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 37, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  3. Mitra, Tapan & Privileggi, Fabio, 2005. "Cantor Type Attractors in Stochastic Growth Models," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 43, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  4. Guido Ortona, 1999. "A weighted-voting electoral system that performs quite well," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 4, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  5. Montefiori, Marcello, 2003. "Hotelling competition on quality in the health care market," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 33, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  6. Ortona, Guido, 2002. "Choosing the electoral system: why not simply the best one?," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 30, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  7. Ferruccio Ponzano, 2001. "Efficiency wages and endogenous supervision technology," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 23, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  8. Bondonio, Daniele, 2002. "Evaluating the Employment Impact of Business Incentive Programs in EU Disadvantaged Areas. A case from Northern Italy," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 27, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  9. Locatelli-Biey, Marilena & Zanola, Roberto, 2003. "The market for Picasso prints: an hybrid model approach," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 34, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  10. Guido Ortona, 2000. "On the Xenophobia of non-discriminated Ethnic Minorities," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 15, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  11. Amisano, Franco, 2002. "La corruzione amministrativa in una burocrazia di tipo concorrenziale: modelli di analisi economica," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 29, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  12. Ortona, Guido, 2004. "Voting for the Electoral System: an Experiment," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 42, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  13. Mandana, Hajj & Panizza, Ugo, 2006. "Religion and education gender gap: Are Muslims different?," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 64, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  14. Bissey, Marie-Edith & Carini, Mauro & Ortona, Guido, 2003. "ALEX3: A simulation program to compare electoral systems," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 36, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  15. Ponzano, Ferruccio, 2005. "Optimal provision of public goods under imperfect intergovernmental competition," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 44, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  16. Bernardi, Luigi & Fraschini, Angela, 2005. "Tax system and tax reforms in India," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 45, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  17. Ramello, Giovanni, 2006. "What's in a sign? Trademark law and enconomic theory," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 67, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  18. Ottone, Stefania, 2005. "Transfers and Altruistic Punishments in Solomon's Game experiments," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 50, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  19. Cassone, Alberto & Marchese, Carla, 2001. "Einaudi e i servizi pubblici, ovvero come contrastare i monopolisti predoni e la burocrazia corrotta," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 17, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  20. Ponzano, Ferruccio, 2005. "Competition among different levels of government: the re-election problem," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 47, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  21. Ferrero, Mario, 1999. "A model of political enterprise," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 9, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  22. Ottone, Stefania, 2004. "Transfers and Altruistic Punishments in Third Party Punishment Game Experiments," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 41, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
  23. Sisto, Andrea & Zanola, Roberto, 2004. "Rational Addiction to Cinema? A Dynamic Panel Analysis of European Countries," P.O.L.I.S. department's Working Papers 38, Department of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS. [Downloadable!]
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? It is the publishers that input data about their publications, as there is no staff at RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2008-9-27.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.