This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Preferences with and without prices - does the price attribute affect behavior in stated preference surveys? Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Fredrik Carlsson ()
Peter Frykblom
Carl Lagerkvist
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
No abstract is available for
this item.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Article provided by European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists in its journal Environmental and Resource Economics .
Volume (Year): 38 (2007)
Issue (Month): 2 (October)
Pages: 155-164
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:kap:enreec:v:38:y:2007:i:2:p:155-164Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.springerlink.com/link.asp?id=100263
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Keywords: Choice experiment ; Non-market valuation ; Preference reversal ; Warm glow ; D12 ; Q19 ; Q51 ; Other versions of this item:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: Bryan, Stirling & Parry, David, 2002.
"Structural Reliability of Conjoint Measurement in Health Care: An Empirical Investigation ,"
Applied Economics ,
Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 561-67, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Krinsky, Itzhak & Robb, A Leslie, 1986.
"On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities ,"
The Review of Economics and Statistics ,
MIT Press, vol. 68(4), pages 715-19, November.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Seidl, Christian, 2002.
" Preference Reversal ,"
Journal of Economic Surveys ,
Blackwell Publishing, vol. 16(5), pages 621-55, December.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Jayson L. Lusk & Ted C. Schroeder, 2004.
"Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks ,"
American Journal of Agricultural Economics ,
American Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 86(2), pages 467-482, 05.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
John A. List, 2002.
"Preference Reversals of a Different Kind: The "More Is Less" Phenomenon ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 92(5), pages 1636-1643, December.
[Downloadable!]
P. Frykblom & Jason Shogren, 2000.
"An Experimental Testing of Anchoring Effects in Discrete Choice Questions ,"
Environmental & Resource Economics ,
European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 16(3), pages 329-341, July.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Donald Green & Karen Jacowitz & Daniel Kahneman & Daniel McFadden, 1995.
"Referendum Contingent Valuation, Anchoring, and Willingness to Pay for Public Goods ,"
Working Papers
_010, University of California at Berkeley, Econometrics Laboratory Software Archive.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Green, Donald & Jacowitz, Karen E. & Kahneman, Daniel & McFadden, Daniel, 1998.
"Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods ,"
Resource and Energy Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 85-116, June.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) Andreoni, James, 1989.
"Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence ,"
Journal of Political Economy ,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 97(6), pages 1447-58, December.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Kenneth E. Train, 1998.
"Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences over People ,"
Land Economics ,
University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 74(2), pages 230-239.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Alpizar, Francisco & Carlsson, Fredrik & Martinsson, Peter, 2001.
"Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation ,"
Working Papers in Economics
52, Göteborg University, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
John A. List & Robert P. Berrens & Alok K. Bohara & Joe Kerkvliet, 2004.
"Examining the Role of Social Isolation on Stated Preferences ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 94(3), pages 741-752, June.
[Downloadable!]
Kenneth Train, 2003.
"Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation ,"
Online economics textbooks ,
SUNY-Oswego, Department of Economics, number emetr2, March.
[Downloadable!]
Kelly L. Giraud & John B. Loomis, 2005.
"Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions ,"
American Journal of Agricultural Economics ,
American Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 87(2), pages 353-365, 05.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Cummings, Ronald G & Harrison, Glenn W & Rutstrom, E Elisabet, 1995.
"Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible? ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 85(1), pages 260-66, March.
John A. List, 2001.
"Do Explicit Warnings Eliminate the Hypothetical Bias in Elicitation Procedures? Evidence from Field Auctions for Sportscards ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1498-1507, December.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Slovic, Paul & Lichtenstein, Sarah, 1983.
"Preference Reversals: A Broader Perspective ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 73(4), pages 596-605, September.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Dan Ariely & George Loewenstein & Drazen Prelec, 2003.
""Coherent Arbitrariness": Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences ,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics ,
MIT Press, vol. 118(1), pages 73-105, February.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full
references Cited by : (explanations , Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Ubilava, David & Foster, Ken, 2007.
"Targeting Consumers by Store - The Basis of Increased Sales with Less Advertising ,"
2007 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2007, Mobile, Alabama
34909, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
[Downloadable!]
Ubilava, David & Foster, Kenneth A. & Lusk, Jayson L. & Nilsson, Tomas, 2008.
"Differences In U.S. Consumer Preferences For Certified Pork Chops When Facing Branded Vs. Non-Branded Choices ,"
2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida
6194, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
[Downloadable!]
Marit Kragt & Jeff Bennett, 2008.
"Designing Choice Experiments to Test for Anchoring and Framing Effects ,"
Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports
0810, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School, Australian National University.
[Downloadable!]
Liljenstolpe, Carolina, 2005.
"Valuing Animal Welfare with Choice Experiments: An Application to Swedish Pig Production ,"
2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark
24503, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
[Downloadable!]
Access and
download statistics Did you know? IDEAS is not the only service displaying RePEc data. Choose on RePEc which service fits your needs best.
This page was last updated on 2009-12-4.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .