This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Referendum Contingent Valuation, Anchoring, and Willingness to Pay for Public Goods

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Donald Green
Karen Jacowitz
Daniel Kahneman
Daniel McFadden ()

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://emlab.berkeley.edu/wp/mcfadden1195/gjkm_f15.ps
File Format: application/postscript
File Function: Figure 15
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of California at Berkeley, Econometrics Laboratory Software Archive in its series Working Papers with number _010.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Nov 1995
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wop:calbem:_010

Note: This paper was presented by Daniel McFadden at the World Congress of the Econometric Society, August 1995. The manuscript is in compressed postscript format, viewable in browsers that can spawn an external viewer like ghostscript.Figures 1 - 15. Please note that if you view the figures, you will need to have the viewer rotate them 90 degrees, from a portrait to landscape orientation.
Contact details of provider:
Email:
Web page: http://emlab.berkeley.edu/eml/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Thomas Krichel).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Sandra Lechner & Anne Rozan & François Laisney, 2003. "A model of the anchoring effect in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up," Working Papers of BETA 2003-07, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, ULP, Strasbourg. [Downloadable!]
  2. M. Genius & Elisabetta Strazzera, 2005. "Modeling Elicitation effects in contingent valuation studies: a Monte Carlo Analysis of the bivariate approach," Working Paper CRENoS 200502, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia. [Downloadable!]
  3. Soest, A.H.O. van & Hurd, M., 2004. "Models for anchoring and acquiescence bias in consumption data," Discussion Paper 26, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. Andersson, Henrik & Svensson, Mikael, 2007. "Cognitive Ability and Scale Bias in the Contingent Valuation Method," Working Papers 2007:1, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  5. Carlsson, Fredrik & Frykblom, Peter & Lagerkvist, Carl-Johan, 2004. "Preferences With and Without Prices - does the price attribute affect behavior in stated preference surveys?," Working Papers in Economics 150, Göteborg University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Daniel McFadden, 2001. "Economic Choices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(3), pages 351-378, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  7. Marit E Kragt & Jeff Bennett, . "What’s appropriate? Investigating the Effects of Attribute Level Framing and Changing Cost Levels in Choice Experiments," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 0917, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School, Australian National University. [Downloadable!]
  8. John C. Whitehead & Subhrendu K. Pattanayak & George L. Van Houtven & Brett R. Gelso, . "Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science," Working Papers 05-19, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  9. Borghans,Lex & Golsteyn,Bart H.H., 2005. "Time Discounting and the Body Mass Index," Research Memoranda 006, Maastricht : ROA, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  10. Riccardo Scarpa & Susanne Menzel, 2005. "Protection Motivation Theory and Contingent Valuation: Perceived Realism, Threat and WTP Estimates for Biodiversity Protection," Working Papers 2005.26, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. [Downloadable!]
  11. Arthur van Soest & Michael Hurd, 2004. "A Test for Anchoring and Yea-Saying in Experimental Consumption Data," NBER Working Papers 10462, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  12. Liam Delaney & Francis O’Toole, 2004. "Irish Public Service Broadcasting - A Contingent Valuation Analysis," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 35(3), pages 321-350. [Downloadable!]
  13. P. Frykblom & Jason Shogren, 2000. "An Experimental Testing of Anchoring Effects in Discrete Choice Questions," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 16(3), pages 329-341, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  14. Magnac, Thierry & Maurin, Eric, 2004. "Partial Identification in Monotone Binary Models: Discrete Regressors and Interval Data," IDEI Working Papers 280, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse, revised Jan 2005. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  15. Marit Kragt & Jeff Bennett, 2008. "Designing Choice Experiments to Test for Anchoring and Framing Effects," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 0810, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School, Australian National University. [Downloadable!]
  16. Seidl , Christian & Traub, Stefan & Morone, Andrea, 2003. "Relative Deprivation, Personal Income Satisfaction, and Average Well-Being under Different Income Distributions," Economics Working Papers 2003,05, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  17. Vazques Alvarez, R. & Melenberg, B. & Soest, A. van, 2001. "Nonparametric bounds in the presence of item nonresponse, unfolding brackets, and anchoring," Discussion Paper 67, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  18. Kjartan Sælensminde, 2002. "The Impact of Choice Inconsistencies in Stated Choice Studies," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 23(4), pages 403-420, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  19. Simonson, Itamar & Drolet, Aimee L., 2003. "Anchoring Effects on Consumers' Willingness-to-Pay and Willingness-to-Accept," Research Papers 1787, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? There is a FAQ (frequently asked questions).

This page was last updated on 2009-11-6.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.