IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i4p547-d1367011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decomposition and Driving Factors of Total Factor Productivity of Food Crops in the Yellow River Basin, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jianxu Liu

    (School of Economics, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Xiaoqing Li

    (School of Finance, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Yansong Li

    (School of Economics, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Jirakom Sirisrisakulchai

    (Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Xuefei Kang

    (School of Economics, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Jiande Cui

    (School of Economics, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China)

Abstract

The urgency of enhancing agricultural productivity within the Yellow River Basin cannot be overstated, given its critical role in ensuring food security amidst the challenges posed by climate change, natural disasters, and the increasing demand for food crops. Utilizing panel data from nine provinces within the Yellow River Basin for the period 2001 to 2020, this study examines the temporal characteristics and spatial distribution of Total Factor Productivity (TFP) for key grain crops—namely wheat, corn, and soybean—through the application of the Malmquist index which can be decomposed through the DEA-Malmquist index methodology. The empirical results demonstrate that TFP growth rates for these crops have exhibited significant phase variations, with soybean recording the highest TFP growth rate in the basin. Additionally, this study underscores marked regional disparities in soybean productivity. TFP decomposition reveals that the primary drivers of TFP improvement across these crops are attributed to technical progress, with gains in overall technical efficiency largely due to scale efficiency enhancements, whereas pure technical efficiency has shown limited progress. Regional analysis indicates that Inner Mongolia leads in TFP growth for all crops, while Ningxia, Sichuan, and Shaanxi lag behind in wheat, corn, and soybean. Additionally, our analysis delineates natural disasters as a significant barrier to Total Factor Productivity (TFP), notably obstructing technological advancements in wheat cultivation. The investigation further reveals a positive relationship between regional per capita income and the growth of wheat TFP, in contrast to a negative relationship with the TFP growth of corn and soybeans. Moreover, investing in agriculture, forestry, water management, and road infrastructure supports the growth of wheat TFP, while urbanization levels pose constraints. Conclusively, an uptick in annual rural electricity usage, along with improved per capita postal and telecommunication services, exerts a favorable influence on TFP for corn and soybeans.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianxu Liu & Xiaoqing Li & Yansong Li & Jirakom Sirisrisakulchai & Xuefei Kang & Jiande Cui, 2024. "Decomposition and Driving Factors of Total Factor Productivity of Food Crops in the Yellow River Basin, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:547-:d:1367011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/4/547/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/4/547/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Konstantin Gluschenko, 2018. "Measuring regional inequality: to weight or not to weight?," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 36-59, January.
    2. Peña-Guerrero, Mayra Daniela & Nauditt, Alexandra & Muñoz-Robles, Carlos & Ribbe, Lars & Meza, Francisco, 2020. "Drought impacts on water quality and potential implications for agricultural production in the Maipo River Basin, Central Chile," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 65(6), pages 1005-1021.
    3. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    4. Bastian, Chris T. & McLeod, Donald M. & Germino, Matthew J. & Reiners, William A. & Blasko, Benedict J., 2002. "Environmental amenities and agricultural land values: a hedonic model using geographic information systems data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 337-349, March.
    5. Caves, Douglas W & Christensen, Laurits R & Diewert, W Erwin, 1982. "The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(6), pages 1393-1414, November.
    6. Huang, Yawen & Tao, Bo & Xiaochen, Zhu & Yang, Yanjun & Liang, Liang & Wang, Lixin & Jacinthe, Pierre-Andre & Tian, Hanqin & Ren, Wei, 2021. "Conservation tillage increases corn and soybean water productivity across the Ohio River Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    7. Jebali, Eya & Essid, Hédi & Khraief, Naceur, 2017. "The analysis of energy efficiency of the Mediterranean countries: A two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 991-1000.
    8. Bhushan, Surya, 2005. "Total Factor Productivity Growth of Wheat in India: A Malmquist Approach," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 60(1), pages 1-17.
    9. Shen, Zhiyang & Baležentis, Tomas & Ferrier, Gary D., 2019. "Agricultural productivity evolution in China: A generalized decomposition of the Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicator," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    10. Hao Shi & Bing Ye, 2018. "China's Abolition of the Agricultural Tax, Local Governments’ Responses and Economic Growth," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 517-542, September.
    11. Regret Sunge & Nicholas Ngepah, 2020. "The Impact of Agricultural Trade Liberalization on Agricultural Total Factor Productivity Growth in Africa," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 571-598, October.
    12. A. Camanho & R. Dyson, 2006. "Data envelopment analysis and Malmquist indices for measuring group performance," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 35-49, August.
    13. Nicholas Rada & David Schimmelpfennig, 2018. "Evaluating research and education performance in Indian agricultural development," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(3), pages 395-406, May.
    14. Simar, Leopold & Wilson, Paul W., 2007. "Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 31-64, January.
    15. Georganta, Zoe, 1997. "The effect of a free market price mechanism on total factor productivity: The case of the agricultural crop industry in Greece," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1-2), pages 55-71, October.
    16. Cai, Ximing & Yang, Yi-Chen E. & Ringler, Claudia & Zhao, Jianshi & You, Liangzhi, 2011. "Agricultural water productivity assessment for the Yellow River Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(8), pages 1297-1306, May.
    17. Haonan Zhang & Zheng Chen & Jieyong Wang & Haitao Wang & Yingwen Zhang, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Pattern of Agricultural Total Factor Productivity Change (Tfpch) in China and Its Implications for Agricultural Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Wijesiri, Mahinda & Viganò, Laura & Meoli, Michele, 2015. "Efficiency of microfinance institutions in Sri Lanka: a two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 74-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Santos, Sérgio P. & São José, José M.S., 2018. "Measuring and decomposing the gender pay gap: A new frontier approachAuthor-Name: Amado, Carla A.F," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 357-373.
    2. Ikram Ullah Khan & Sadaqat Ali & Habib Nawaz Khan, 2018. "Market Concentration, Risk-taking, and Efficiency of Commercial Banks in Pakistan: An Application of the Two-Stage Double Bootstrap DEA," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 10(2), pages 65-96, June.
    3. R, Sendhil & P, Ramasundaram & P, Anbukkani & Singh, Randhir & Sharma, Indu, 2015. "Trends and Determinants of Research Driven Total Factor Productivity in Indian Wheat," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212491, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Pontus Mattsson & Jonas Månsson & Christian Andersson & Fredrik Bonander, 2018. "A bootstrapped Malmquist index applied to Swedish district courts," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 109-139, August.
    5. Managi, Shunsuke & Jena, Pradyot Ranjan, 2008. "Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 432-440, April.
    6. Barnabé Walheer, 2018. "Cost Malmquist productivity index: an output-specific approach for group comparison," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 79-94, February.
    7. Chen, Xiang & Grifell-Tatjé, Emili & Fu, Tsu-Tan, 2023. "A profit difference decomposition model for measuring group performance: an application to Chinese and Taiwanese commercial banks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Laure Latruffe & Yann Desjeux, 2016. "Common Agricultural Policy support, technical efficiencyand productivity change in French agriculture," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 97(1), pages 15-28.
    9. Muliaman Hadad & Maximilian Hall & Karligash Kenjegalieva & Wimboh Santoso & Richard Simper, 2011. "Banking efficiency and stock market performance: an analysis of listed Indonesian banks," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Luis Rodríguez-Domínguez & Javier Parra-Domínguez, 2013. "Yearly evolution of police efficiency in Spain and explanatory factors," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 21(1), pages 31-62, January.
    11. Afsharian, Mohsen & Ahn, Heinz & Harms, Sören Guntram, 2019. "Performance comparison of management groups under centralised management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 845-854.
    12. Wijesiri, Mahinda & Yaron, Jacob & Meoli, Michele, 2017. "Assessing the financial and outreach efficiency of microfinance institutions: Do age and size matter?," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 63-76.
    13. Kaffash, Sepideh & Azizi, Roza & Huang, Ying & Zhu, Joe, 2020. "A survey of data envelopment analysis applications in the insurance industry 1993–2018," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 801-813.
    14. Neves Bezerra de Melo, Felipe Luiz & Sampaio, Raquel Menezes Bezerra & Sampaio, Luciano Menezes Bezerra, 2018. "Efficiency, productivity gains, and the size of Brazilian supermarkets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 99-111.
    15. Wu, Yunna & Ke, Yiming & Zhang, Ting & Liu, Fangtong & Wang, Jing, 2018. "Performance efficiency assessment of photovoltaic poverty alleviation projects in China: A three-phase data envelopment analysis model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 599-610.
    16. Bhushan, S., 2016. "TFP Growth of Wheat and Paddy in Post-Green Revolution Era in India: Parametric and Non-Parametric Analysis," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 29(1).
    17. Haiyan Deng & Ge Bai & Kristiaan Kerstens & Zhiyang Shen, 2023. "Comparing green productivity under convex and nonconvex technologies: Which is a robust approach consistent with energy structure?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(8), pages 4377-4394, December.
    18. Reza Fallahnejad & Mohammad Reza Mozaffari & Peter Fernandes Wanke & Yong Tan, 2024. "Nash Bargaining Game Enhanced Global Malmquist Productivity Index for Cross-Productivity Index," Games, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Wijesiri, Mahinda & Meoli, Michele, 2015. "Productivity change of microfinance institutions in Kenya: A bootstrap Malmquist approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 115-121.
    20. Charles-Henri DiMaria, 2014. "Sustainability matters," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1257-1269, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:547-:d:1367011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.