IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v445y2016icp48-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of cooperation driven by social-welfare-based migration

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yan
  • Ye, Hang
  • Zhang, Hong

Abstract

Individuals’ migration behavior may play a significant role in the evolution of cooperation. In reality, individuals’ migration behavior may depend on their perceptions of social welfare. To study the relationship between social-welfare-based migration and the evolution of cooperation, we consider an evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma game (PDG) in which an individual’s migration depends on social welfare but not on the individual’s own payoff. By introducing three important social welfare functions (SWFs) that are commonly studied in social science, we find that social-welfare-based migration can promote cooperation under a wide range of parameter values. In addition, these three SWFs have different effects on cooperation, especially through the different spatial patterns formed by migration. Because the relative efficiency of the three SWFs will change if the parameter values are changed, we cannot determine which SWF is optimal for supporting cooperation. We also show that memory capacity, which is needed to evaluate individual welfare, may affect cooperation levels in opposite directions under different SWFs. Our work should be helpful for understanding the evolution of human cooperation and bridging the chasm between studies of social preferences and studies of social cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yan & Ye, Hang & Zhang, Hong, 2016. "Evolution of cooperation driven by social-welfare-based migration," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 445(C), pages 48-56.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:445:y:2016:i:c:p:48-56
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.10.107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437115009772
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2015.10.107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Izquierdo, Luis R. & Izquierdo, Segismundo S. & Vega-Redondo, Fernando, 2014. "Leave and let leave: A sufficient condition to explain the evolutionary emergence of cooperation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 91-113.
    2. Sen, Amartya, 1997. "On Economic Inequality," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198292975, Decembrie.
    3. Hoffman, Elizabeth & McCabe, Kevin & Smith, Vernon L, 1996. "Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 653-660, June.
    4. Vainstein, Mendeli H. & Arenzon, Jeferson J., 2014. "Spatial social dilemmas: Dilution, mobility and grouping effects with imitation dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 394(C), pages 145-157.
    5. Gary E. Bolton & Axel Ockenfels, 2006. "Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1906-1911, December.
    6. Dirk Engelmann & Martin Strobel, 2004. "Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(4), pages 857-869, September.
    7. Lu, Kun & Wu, Bin & Li, Ming-chu & Wang, Zhen, 2014. "Other-regarding preference causing ping-pong effect in self-questioning game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 51-58.
    8. Rui Cong & Bin Wu & Yuanying Qiu & Long Wang, 2012. "Evolution of Cooperation Driven by Reputation-Based Migration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-7, May.
    9. Gary Charness & Matthew Rabin, 2002. "Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(3), pages 817-869.
    10. Martin A. Nowak & Karl Sigmund, 1998. "Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6685), pages 573-577, June.
    11. M.A. Nowak & K. Sigmund, 1998. "Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity by Image Scoring/ The Dynamics of Indirect Reciprocity," Working Papers ir98040, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    12. Chen, Xiaojie & Fu, Feng & Wang, Long, 2008. "Promoting cooperation by local contribution under stochastic win-stay-lose-shift mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(22), pages 5609-5615.
    13. Brian J. Cushing, 1993. "The Effect of the Social Welfare System on Metropolitan Migration in the US, by Income Group, Gender and Family Structure," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(2), pages 325-337, March.
    14. Ernst Fehr & Urs Fischbacher, 2002. "Why Social Preferences Matter -- The Impact of Non-Selfish Motives on Competition, Cooperation and Incentives," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(478), pages 1-33, March.
    15. Wang, Zhen & Chen, Tianyi & Wang, Xingpu & Jin, Jiuwu & Li, Mingchu, 2013. "Evolution of co-operation among mobile agents with different influence," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(19), pages 4655-4662.
    16. Nash, John, 1950. "The Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), pages 155-162, April.
    17. Bo, Xianyu, 2010. "Other-regarding preference and the evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma on complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(5), pages 1105-1114.
    18. Ernst Fehr & Urs Fischbacher, "undated". "Why Social Preferences Matter - The Impact of Non-Selfish Motives on Competition," IEW - Working Papers 084, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    19. Chen, Zhuo & Gao, Jianxi & Cai, Yunze & Xu, Xiaoming, 2011. "Evolution of cooperation among mobile agents," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(9), pages 1615-1622.
    20. Elizabeth Tricomi & Antonio Rangel & Colin F. Camerer & John P. O’Doherty, 2010. "Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences," Nature, Nature, vol. 463(7284), pages 1089-1091, February.
    21. Marta C. González & César A. Hidalgo & Albert-László Barabási, 2009. "Understanding individual human mobility patterns," Nature, Nature, vol. 458(7235), pages 238-238, March.
    22. D. Brockmann & L. Hufnagel & T. Geisel, 2006. "The scaling laws of human travel," Nature, Nature, vol. 439(7075), pages 462-465, January.
    23. M. Droz & J. Szwabiński & G. Szabó, 2009. "Motion of influential players can support cooperation in Prisoner’s Dilemma," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 71(4), pages 579-585, October.
    24. Liu, Yongkui & Chen, Xiaojie & Zhang, Lin & Tao, Fei & Wang, Long, 2012. "Does migration cost influence cooperation among success-driven individuals?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 45(11), pages 1301-1308.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tim Johnson & Oleg Smirnov, 2020. "Temporal assortment of cooperators in the spatial prisoner's dilemma," Papers 2011.14440, arXiv.org.
    2. Li, Jiaqi & Zhang, Jianlei & Chen, Zengqiang & Liu, Qun, 2023. "Aspiration drives adaptive switching between two different payoff matrices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 446(C).
    3. Li, Jiaqi & Dang, Jianwu & Zhang, Jianlei, 2020. "Length of information-based bidirectional choice in spatial prisoner’s dilemma," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    4. Cui, Guang-Hai & Wang, Zhen & Ren, Jian-Kang & Lu, Kun & Li, Ming-Chu, 2016. "Promotion of cooperation induced by discriminators in the spatial multi-player donor–recipient game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 92-103.
    5. Zhao, Xiaowei & Xia, Haoxiang, 2023. "Information accuracy of migration and imitation influences the evolution of cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. He, Zhixue & Geng, Yini & Shen, Chen & Shi, Lei, 2020. "Evolution of cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game with extortion strategy under win-stay-lose-move rule," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Li, Bing & Zhao, Xiaowei & Xia, Haoxiang, 2019. "Promotion of cooperation by Hybrid Migration mechanisms in the Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 514(C), pages 1-8.
    8. Wang, Ding & Guo, Peng & Kilgour, D. Marc & Ponnambalam, Kumaraswamy & Hipel, Keith W., 2022. "The evolution of R&D collaboration in inter-organizational project networks: Effects of reference points for competitive preference," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 591(C).
    9. Wang, Xianjia & Ding, Rui & Zhao, Jinhua & Gu, Cuiling, 2022. "The rise and fall of cooperation in populations with multiple groups," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 413(C).
    10. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2019. "Cleverly handling the donation information can promote cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 363-373.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:7:y:2012:i:5:p:618-627 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Shoham Choshen-Hillel & Ilan Yaniv, 2012. "Social preferences shaped by conflicting motives: When enhancing social welfare creates unfavorable comparisons for the self," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 7(5), pages 618-627, September.
    3. Adrian Bruhin & Ernst Fehr & Daniel Schunk, 2019. "The many Faces of Human Sociality: Uncovering the Distribution and Stability of Social Preferences," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1025-1069.
    4. Frank Cowell & Marc Fleurbaey & Bertil Tungodden, 2015. "The tyranny puzzle in social preferences: an empirical investigation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(4), pages 765-792, December.
    5. Nicolas Jacquemet & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2014. "What drives failure to maximize payoffs in the lab? A test of the inequality aversion hypothesis," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 18(4), pages 243-264, December.
    6. Pamela Jakiela, 2013. "Equity vs. efficiency vs. self-interest: on the use of dictator games to measure distributional preferences," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 16(2), pages 208-221, June.
    7. Hedegaard, Morten & Kerschbamer, Rudolf & Müller, Daniel & Tyran, Jean-Robert, 2021. "Distributional preferences explain individual behavior across games and time," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 231-255.
    8. Genki Ichinose & Masaya Saito & Shinsuke Suzuki, 2013. "Collective Chasing Behavior between Cooperators and Defectors in the Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-10, July.
    9. Danz, David & Engelmann, Dirk & Kübler, Dorothea, 2022. "Do legal standards affect ethical concerns of consumers?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Antonio Filippin & Manuela Raimondi, 2016. "The Patron Game with Heterogeneous Endowments: A Case Against Inequality Aversion," De Economist, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 69-81, March.
    11. Christian Thoeni & Simon Gaechter, 2011. "Peer Effects and Social Preferences in Voluntary Cooperation," Discussion Papers 2011-09, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    12. Frank A. Cowell, 2008. "Income Distribution and Inequality," Chapters, in: John B. Davis & Wilfred Dolfsma (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Social Economics, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Müller, Stephan & Rau, Holger A., 2017. "Decisions under uncertainty in social contexts," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 290, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics, revised 2017.
    14. Engelmann, Dirk & Fischbacher, Urs, 2009. "Indirect reciprocity and strategic reputation building in an experimental helping game," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 399-407, November.
    15. Brice Corgnet & Brian Gunia & Roberto Hernán González, 2021. "Harnessing the power of social incentives to curb shirking in teams," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 139-167, February.
    16. Sabrina Teyssier, 2007. "Optimal Group Incentives with Social Preferences and Self-Selection," Post-Print halshs-00144901, HAL.
    17. Dhami, Sanjit & al-Nowaihi, Ali, 2010. "Redistributive policies with heterogeneous social preferences of voters," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 743-759, August.
    18. John, Katrin & Thomsen, Stephan L., 2017. "Gender Differences in the Development of Other-Regarding Preferences," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-607, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    19. Bednarik, Peter & Linnerooth-Bayer, Joanne & Magnuszewski, Piotr & Dieckmann, Ulf, 2019. "A Game of Common-pool Resource Management: Effects of Communication, Risky Environment and Worldviews," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 287-292.
    20. Wilson, Bart J., 2008. "Language games of reciprocity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 365-377, November.
    21. Premo, L.S. & Brown, Justin R., 2019. "The opportunity cost of walking away in the spatial iterated prisoner’s dilemma," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 40-48.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:445:y:2016:i:c:p:48-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.